Defeat the radical left Press in America!

[pocketfullofshells]

Yet you did not point out any false facts. Now I am waiting.

Well when acorn responds to the question I will show my point...and I am still waiting...

 

[top gun]

Geez! The sixties were good to you. (Metaphorically speaking.)

Ya think?

Here's the "always" trippy LSD way of looking at "fair" things.

Tax cuts for the rich... WONDERFUL!

Corporate welfare... COULD NOT BE MORE NEEDED!

Tax loopholes for the wealthy... DRILL BABY DRILL!

Health Insurance Reform so when an American worker loses a job and is deathly ill he doesn't have to lose his home and everything he owns putting his whole family out on the street... IT'S COOL NOW MAN QUIT HARSHING MY BUZZ...

 

[laughinatreps]

'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe.
"Beware the Jabberwock, my son! The jaws that bite, the claws that catch! Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun The frumious Bandersnatch!"
He took his vorpal sword in hand:Long time the manxome foe he sought—So rested he by the Tumtum tree,And stood awhile in thought.
And as in uffish thought he stood,The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,Came whiffling through the tulgey wood,And burbled as it came!
One, two! One, two! and through and throughThe vorpal blade went snicker-snack!He left it dead, and with its headHe went galumphing back.
"And hast thou slain the Jabberwock?Come to my arms, my beamish boy!O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"He chortled in his joy.
'Twas brillig, and the slithy tovesDid gyre and gimble in the wabe;All mimsy were the borogoves,And the mome raths outgrabe

 

[klynn48]

Yes thats what I am saying, they did not put out the real facts...yes I know people did in fact commit voter reg fraud...the question is again

WHO Reported this problem? And I want little Acorn to tell me...with all the facts from Fox Noise.

You must watch CNN...

 

[pocketfullofshells]

You must watch CNN...

Why becuse I know facts? not Right wing Myths?

And no I dont

 

[pocketfullofshells]

Still waiting little accorn? was the question to hard?

 

[ASPCA4EVER]

You must watch CNN...

Hey, instead of stepping into a discussion between those two, why don't you spend some quality time researching the LIST of your SPEICAL priorities that I've been waiting for you to bring to the forum...you remember that LIST that you said our current President wasn't paying any attention too

I'm all a twitter waiting to hear what & why your list would be more important then our current administrations...I'm waiting...still waiting for that plethora of HIGH PRIORITIES THAT YOU HAVE

 

[Dante the Marxist]

I would agree that liberal newspapers are in a section of the left, but that would be the whining, "blacks cant be rascist", rich, guilty yuppie section of the left, wich cant be that far left, can they? But radical leftist? These people need to learn what that means. The radical left consists of communists, anarchists, and socialists, not tree-hugging liberals.

 

[pocketfullofshells]

I am shocked, mr I know evrything about Accor..little accorn....still has said nothing to what I felt was a simple question?

Dont know?

Dont want to say it?

Hmm dont worry its not going away.

Little accorn I await ....

 

[Mare Tranquillity]

Just so all of you Christians know, the Conservatives don't like the Bible as it is and are rewriting it to make it dovetail more neatly with their conservative ideas. Next thing you know Jesus will be advocating preemptive war, torture, and capitalism. Is it any wonder that Christianity is losing credibility?

"As of 2009, there is no fully conservative translation of the Bible which satisfies the following ten guidelines:[2]

1.Framework against Liberal Bias: providing a strong framework that enables a thought-for-thought translation without corruption by liberal bias
2.Not Emasculated: avoiding unisex, "gender inclusive" language, and other modern emasculation of Christianity
3.Not Dumbed Down: not dumbing down the reading level, or diluting the intellectual force and logic of Christianity; the NIV is written at only the 7th grade level[3]
4.Utilize Powerful Conservative Terms: using powerful new conservative terms as they develop;[4] defective translations use the word "comrade" three times as often as "volunteer"; similarly, updating words which have a change in meaning, such as "word", "peace", and "miracle".
5.Combat Harmful Addiction: combating addiction by using modern terms for it, such as "gamble" rather than "cast lots";[5] using modern political terms, such as "register" rather than "enroll" for the census
6.Accept the Logic of Hell: applying logic with its full force and effect, as in not denying or downplaying the very real existence of Hell or the Devil.
7.Express Free Market Parables; explaining the numerous economic parables with their full free-market meaning
8.Exclude Later-Inserted Liberal Passages: excluding the later-inserted liberal passages that are not authentic, such as the adulteress story
9.Credit Open-Mindedness of Disciples: crediting open-mindedness, often found in youngsters like the eyewitnesses Mark and John, the authors of two of the Gospels
10.Prefer Conciseness over Liberal Wordiness: preferring conciseness to the liberal style of high word-to-substance ratio; avoid compound negatives and unnecessary ambiguities; prefer concise, consistent use of the word "Lord" rather than "Jehovah" or "Yahweh" or "Lord God."
http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

 

[pocketfullofshells]

Still Waiting.....

 

[Dr.Who]

Just so all of you Christians know, the Conservatives don't like the Bible as it is and are rewriting it to make it dovetail more neatly with their conservative ideas. Next thing you know Jesus will be advocating preemptive war, torture, and capitalism. Is it any wonder that Christianity is losing credibility?

One conservative group comes up with a hair brained scheme and suddenly you know that conservatives in general don't like the bible - brilliant.

I have heard of a gay man who didn't like being gay. Should I then state that gay men don't like being gay? They even created a whole category for it in the DSM.

 

[Mare Tranquillity]

One conservative group comes up with a hair brained scheme and suddenly you know that conservatives in general don't like the bible - brilliant.

I have heard of a gay man who didn't like being gay. Should I then state that gay men don't like being gay? They even created a whole category for it in the DSM.

Don't flip me sh1t, Who, when you are foursquare for denying legal marriage equality to people you don't happen to like. You can bleat like a sheeple but the fact is these self-identified "conservatives" are rewriting the Bible for political ends. Look at the storm of abuse I got for suggesting a new Council of Nicea to remove the violence, insanity, and obvious errors in the Bible.

Personally, I don't see how a conservative could LIKE the Bible since it's one of the most liberal philosophy books in the world, rich people can't get into Heaven? Nearly two thousand references to caring for the sick, poor, and unfortunate? Giving all your wealth to the poor? Loving others as yourself? There's nothing in there that is conservative, Jesus argued with the entrenched religious hierarchy and was nailed up for His trouble. And He forgave those who used Him so badly. Not only that, He said that we ALL should forgive those who use us spitefully and that we should return good for evil. Again, there is nothing in that philosophy for conservatives. Jesus was advocating the most radical liberal philosophy ever put forward, and that's why hypocrites like you don't pay attention to the hard parts of what He asked of His followers and just practice the easy things like hating and persecuting gays.

 

[top gun]

Just so all of you Christians know, the Conservatives don't like the Bible as it is and are rewriting it to make it dovetail more neatly with their conservative ideas. Next thing you know Jesus will be advocating preemptive war, torture, and capitalism. Is it any wonder that Christianity is losing credibility?

"As of 2009, there is no fully conservative translation of the Bible which satisfies the following ten guidelines:[2]

1.Framework against Liberal Bias: providing a strong framework that enables a thought-for-thought translation without corruption by liberal bias
2.Not Emasculated: avoiding unisex, "gender inclusive" language, and other modern emasculation of Christianity
3.Not Dumbed Down: not dumbing down the reading level, or diluting the intellectual force and logic of Christianity; the NIV is written at only the 7th grade level[3]
4.Utilize Powerful Conservative Terms: using powerful new conservative terms as they develop;[4] defective translations use the word "comrade" three times as often as "volunteer"; similarly, updating words which have a change in meaning, such as "word", "peace", and "miracle".
5.Combat Harmful Addiction: combating addiction by using modern terms for it, such as "gamble" rather than "cast lots";[5] using modern political terms, such as "register" rather than "enroll" for the census
6.Accept the Logic of Hell: applying logic with its full force and effect, as in not denying or downplaying the very real existence of Hell or the Devil.
7.Express Free Market Parables; explaining the numerous economic parables with their full free-market meaning
8.Exclude Later-Inserted Liberal Passages: excluding the later-inserted liberal passages that are not authentic, such as the adulteress story
9.Credit Open-Mindedness of Disciples: crediting open-mindedness, often found in youngsters like the eyewitnesses Mark and John, the authors of two of the Gospels
10.Prefer Conciseness over Liberal Wordiness: preferring conciseness to the liberal style of high word-to-substance ratio; avoid compound negatives and unnecessary ambiguities; prefer concise, consistent use of the word "Lord" rather than "Jehovah" or "Yahweh" or "Lord God."
http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

Hell of a good post Mare...

 

[Dr.Who]

Don't flip me sh1t, Who, when you are foursquare for denying legal marriage equality to people you don't happen to like.

I happen to like a lot of gay people.

I am not against gay people getting married. I am against the state regulating that marriage.

You can bleat like a sheeple but the fact is these self-identified "conservatives" are rewriting the Bible for political ends. Look at the storm of abuse I got for suggesting a new Council of Nicea to remove the violence, insanity, and obvious errors in the Bible.

You wanting to rewrite the bible based on your ideas is as bad as them wanting to rewrite it based on theirs.

Oh, I never said that they were not doing it based on political ends. That WOULD seem to be the reason they are doing it.

Personally, I don't see how a conservative could LIKE the Bible since it's one of the most liberal philosophy books in the world,

NOpe.

rich people can't get into Heaven?

Rich people can get into heaven but they have extra obstacles.

Nearly two thousand references to caring for the sick, poor, and unfortunate?

perfectly consistent with conservative ideals. We want for all of us to care for sick poor etc. Which is why we give to them in larger amounts than liberals do who show by their actions that they dont care.

Giving all your wealth to the poor?

Giving very generously is a conservative ideal.

Loving others as yourself?

also a conservarive ideal - it is what motivates giving. It is why we don't need a socialistic state telling us that we must give.

There's nothing in there that is conservative,

Hmm?

Jesus argued with the entrenched religious hierarchy and was nailed up for His trouble.

Yep.

And He forgave those who used Him so badly. Not only that, He said that we ALL should forgive those who use us spitefully and that we should return good for evil. Again, there is nothing in that philosophy for conservatives.

Apparently you do not think that conservative have the ability to be forgiving. You are going to lose your liberal buddies with that one. All people are equally able to forgive or not.

Jesus was advocating the most radical liberal philosophy ever put forward,

Yes he was.

d that's why hypocrites like you don't pay attention to the hard parts of what He asked of His followers and just practice the easy things like hating and persecuting gays.

Apparently you don't like me.