Bob the Builder
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2009
- Messages
- 307
The current argument is partial birth abortion done in the 7th 8th and 9th month by the abortionist tiler (To save a woman's life).
Only 2 or 3 doctors in the US do this type of abortion, tiler was one of them.
We are disagreeing here on how partially birthing in an intentional breech delivery of a viable child to a dying woman then holding the child’s head inside the woman till the child can be killed before the head of the child can be delivered will in some way save this woman's life.
I am apparently crazy because I think breech delivery is dangerous and far more hurtful to a dying woman’s body than a C section or natural delivery. I am also insane because I do not feel that holding the babies head inside the woman till the baby can be stabbed in the back of the head and killed will somehow save said woman’s life.
The whole argument is a complete misdirection. If the mothers life is in jeopardy to the extent that they'd have to abort the child after allowing her to go into a vaginal delivery, there's no reason they couldn't have done a C Section to begin with. Again, this is a load of garbage reasoning, bringing up a 1 in 100,000 situation to justify the murder of a child because the SLUT that allowed herself to get knocked up in the first place decided that she didn't want to be a mother after all.