The event of the Second hit to the WTC was the trigger that prompted Andrew Card to tell Bush "AMERICA is under attack" and yet more than half an hour elapsed until the PENTAGON was hit and my question is WHAT (if anything) was being done to PROTECT this nations Capital and indeed the PENTAGON?
The "interception" efforts were surrounding Manhattan where the original attacks had taken place, as you probably know, and it was already to late. In the 30 minutes in between the events you mention, there was mass confusion. Flt 77 was originally thought to be a fighter plane, because of its erratic maneuvers, and high speed, especially concerning the normal traffic over that area. You must keep in mind that flt 77 was in the normal ATC path of Runway 15 at Reagan National airport. The crash site is just over a mile from the landing point of planes on that path.
There is little excuse in the reaction time, but that certainly does NOT indicate some sort of malice. I despise George Bush, but I dont think for a second he or his administration had anything to do with this. It is not as simple as you think to scramble fighter planes from military bases, intercept and shoot down civilian airliners.
Not to mention that in the case of the burning up of virtually ALL of FLT77 inside the building, if an aircraft of that size had hit the Pentagon and produced the fireball that we see on the video, what would have had to happen would be for the aircraft to hit the wall and completely penetrate the wall, as in the entire aircraft going inside BEFORE the explosion and fire
Alright nospam, lets think about a few things here. We have a aircraft, that is about 150 feet long, and weighs in the neighborhood of 200,000 pounds. Travling at 500 mph. That means that from the moment the nose hit the outside of the building it took roughly .2 seconds for the entire aircraft to enter the building. It penetrated into the third row of structure while doing so. If you know anything about jet fuel, which is nothing more than a slightly more refined diesel fuel, it does not explode like gasoline, and is relatively slow burning. The fire that resulted is quite consistent with a large scale jet fuel fire.
because if the explosion had happened while the tail section of the plane was outside of the Pentagon, it would have been blown back and remained on the lawn instead of disappearing inside the building.
Again, jet fuel is not explosive like gasoline, it is much more similar to diesel, and by design is less explosive. The tail sectioned entered the building less than the blink of an eye after the nose did.
The entire 9/11/2001 scene is based on a LOT of very improbable things happening on the same day.... the odds are against it!
Cetainly not all of the question will be answered, but that does not indicate the Bush administration is implicit in its actions.
Maybe I'm crazy but I have applied the best logic that I can think of, and the
OFFICIAL 9/11 story is BOGUS!
Well maybe you are crazy. I dont know, but the logic you provide is questionable in my eyes. While as I said before that there will be questions that will forever be unknown, largely due to the fact that those who committed the acts are dead, and thier actual motivation is mysterious, to assume to the US government had something to do with it, is in my eyes slightly crazy.
It would seem that 9/11 was a FALSE FLAG ATTACK.
I would agree if you said it was a false flag attack by several middle eastern nations, most notably, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia I might be willing to listen.
