You might be a moron if

[mark francis]

Was the Flintstones a cartoon or a documentary? Lol

You cannot answer the question, can you? No wonder you are stuck on stupid unscientific assumptions about the universe being many billions of years old.

 

[mark francis]

Feel free to pist any intelligent scientific argument about the moon.
Extrapolating today's situation to the past doesn't count

Are you unaware that if we cast off assumptions of constancy and continuity, we cannot rely on old age dating results. If decay rates changed in the ancient past without our perception, then all old ages derived from measurements dependent upon the assumption that rates have never changed are wrong.

Did the rate of the moon's recession change in the past? It must have, according to those unwilling to challenge old age assumptions, or the moon's current position and rate of recession from earth proves the universe is very young.

 

[pjmret]

We know the moon is moving away from earth at a constant rate. For the purpose of establishing an accurate estimation of how old the universe is can you guess how close the moon was to earth in the beginning?

Why do you say it is constant? Why would it be?
You are a science simpleton

 

[pjmret]

Are you unaware that if we cast off assumptions of constancy and continuity, we cannot rely on old age dating results. If decay rates changed in the ancient past without our perception, then all old ages derived from measurements dependent upon the assumption that rates have never changed are wrong.

Did the rate of the moon's recession change in the past? It must have, according to those unwilling to challenge old age assumptions, or the moon's current position and rate of recession from earth proves the universe is very young.

Yes the earth is constantly changing. Duh continents, ice vs water, etc duh
Only a science moron would think the earth doesnt

 

[pjmret]

You cannot answer the question, can you? No wonder you are stuck on stupid unscientific assumptions about the universe being many billions of years old.

I can answer it lol
Fortunately I am not a science moron who thinks things are 7niform over time

 

[the annoying thing]

I can answer it lol
Fortunately I am not a science moron who thinks things are 7niform over time

Yep you are a science MORON because you think its 99.9990 percent of the time lol a natural MORON at that lol

 

[pjmret]

Yep you are a science MORON because you think its 99.9990 percent of the time lol a natural MORON at that lol

when is the last time science didn't work for you, moron?
you keep refusing to answer that question. lol

 

[the annoying thing]

when is the last time science didn't work for you, moron?
you keep refusing to answer that question. lol

You are a MORON you do not even know what science is like a typical MORON.

Why So Much Science is Wrong, False, Puffed, or Misleading

"The book, while scary and disheartening, is truth-seeking and ultimately optimistic. Ritchie doesn’t come to bury science; he comes to fix it. 'The ideals of the scientific process aren’t the problem,' he writes on the last page, 'the problem is the betrayal of those ideals by the way we do...

www.aier.org

Do you comprehend that much of science is theory .
Now Moron what kind of stupid MORONIC question is when was the last time science didn't work for you . You say the dumbest things MORON>

 

[the annoying thing]

when is the last time science didn't work for you, moron?
you keep refusing to answer that question. lol

That's because your a MORON.

 

[mark francis]

Why do you say it is constant? Why would it be?
You are a science simpleton

If decay rates have not been constant from the beginning, for example, then every old age calculation based upon the assumption that decay rates don't change is unreliable.

 

[mark francis]

when is the last time science didn't work for you, moron?
you keep refusing to answer that question. lol

My father-in-law was a renowned research scientist with dozens of credits for discovering and developing new technologies based on his scientific research. He also taught Creation science and the Bible in his church.

 

[pjmret]

You are a MORON you do not even know what science is like a typical MORON.

Why So Much Science is Wrong, False, Puffed, or Misleading

"The book, while scary and disheartening, is truth-seeking and ultimately optimistic. Ritchie doesn’t come to bury science; he comes to fix it. 'The ideals of the scientific process aren’t the problem,' he writes on the last page, 'the problem is the betrayal of those ideals by the way we do...

www.aier.org

Do you comprehend that much of science is theory .
Now Moron what kind of stupid MORONIC question is when was the last time science didn't work for you . You say the dumbest things MORON>

So for you science is 100 percent accurate

 

[pjmret]

My father-in-law was a renowned research scientist with dozens of credits for discovering and developing new technologies based on his scientific research. He also taught Creation science and the Bible in his church.

So what lol
Only a science moron would think the earth moon system never changes over time

 

[pjmret]

If decay rates have not been constant from the beginning, for example, then every old age calculation based upon the assumption that decay rates don't change is unreliable.

We are talking about moons distance and rate of recession which there is no reason it would be uniform over time duh

 

[mark francis]

So what lol
Only a science moron would think the earth moon system never changes over time

Only an idiot imagines he can date rocks to be millions of years old simply by making certain unproven assumptions in the engineered dating system he designs to spit out the results he wants.