The problem with progressive demo rats and general morons

[pjmret]

List up lug nut , your being a narcissist again ,. you were proven wrong and can not stand it and refuse to comment on it and mow like a weasel you want to change the subject to something . Your such a narcissist its unbelievable how big a moron you really are.


Hear Ricky Retardo read this and learn something .

20 of the Greatest Blunders in Science in the Last 20 Years

What were they thinking?

www.discovermagazine.com

now for one time just one time in your miserable pathetic ignorant life be a man try it . yea it hurts some time to be a real man lug nut try it .

Proven wrong? When has science failed me?

 

[mark francis]

oddly, in my personal life, i'm not sure science has ever failed me. for me personally its 100% correct.

can you show me a case where science failed you?

Science has been wrong about Arctic ice melting. Does that count?

 

[pjmret]

Science has been wrong about Arctic ice melting. Does that count?

Thats one thing that you claim was wrong
Has your TV worked according to science? Etc?

 

[mark francis]

Thats one thing that you claim was wrong
Has your TV worked according to science? Etc?

The TV works because God gave us chemicals, minerals, knowledge, and creativity to design and make it work, not because it evolved on its own with no help from God, or some other such stupid speculation.

 

[pjmret]

The TV works because God gave us chemicals, minerals, knowledge, and creativity to design and make it work, not because it evolved on its own with no help from God, or some other such stupid speculation.

Was science correct or not in your TV? Yes or no moron

 

[mark francis]

Was science correct or not in your TV? Yes or no moron

My father-in-law was a noted scientific expert in the field of ultrasonics, and his inventions led to the developments and improvements of hundreds of modern technological devices and understandings. Like me, he was a believer in the literal accuracy of the Bible, so yes, his scientific advances and contributions prove he was right.

 

[pjmret]

My father-in-law was a noted scientific expert in the field of ultrasonics, and his inventions led to the developments and improvements of hundreds of modern technological devices and understandings. Like me, he was a believer in the literal accuracy of the Bible, so yes, his scientific advances and contributions prove he was right.

Science works in your TV?
Yes or no moron lol

 

[mark francis]

Science works in your TV?
Yes or no moron lol

Science is the study of facts, data, and evidence. The TV is a product of human intelligence given by God and not inherited from monkeys.

 

[pjmret]

Science is the study of facts, data, and evidence. The TV is a product of human intelligence given by God and not inherited from monkeys.

tv works based on science. does your tv work according to science? if so, science is correct once more.

your obsession with monkey is..weird. lol

 

[mark francis]

tv works based on science. does your tv work according to science? if so, science is correct once more.

your obsession with monkey is..weird. lol

Humans think because God gave them brains. Humans did not inherit their brains from animals, so pseudoscience fails again.

 

[pjmret]

Humans think because God gave them brains. Humans did not inherit their brains from animals, so pseudoscience fails again.

let me know when you prove evolution is wrong lol

 

[Redflag]

Western civilisation is being destroyed from within by forces we can’t control

For years now, those of us who warned of the devastating threat posed by the takeover of our institutions by woke ideologues were relentlessly attacked and ridiculed. There is no such thing as “woke”, we were assured by patronising Left-wingers, just “kind” people who “care” about others and who...

news.yahoo.com

They surely are woke just like the ones we have here. They are radical and could care less about America

From the opinion piece in question: "In the Middle East, 'Intifada Revolution' and 'From the river to the sea, [Palestine will be free]"' are unambiguously seen as calls for terrorism and the wiping of Israel from the map, so why do ordinarily, ultra-cautious institutions suddenly claim that there might be a more benign meaning?"

Ordinarily, ultra-cautious institutions "suddenly" claim that there might be a more benign meaning because they are ultra-cautious institutions. As such, they matter-of-factly acknowledge that the slogan 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" is nothing more than an expression of the desire of Palestinians to be free of the occupation and accompanying oppression they have suffered since 1948.

In reality, even if Palestinians wished to wipe Israel off the map, it would be a pipe dream, for they haven't the ability to do so. Ergo, the assumption that it is Palestinians who want to wipe Israel off the map is a reflection of the psychological projection exhibited by many Israelis and their supporters. Indeed, with the world's fourth most robust military, complete with roughly 250 illegally produced and deployed theater nuclear warheads, Israel is more than capable of wiping what remains of Palestine off the map. And it is in the process of doing that as I type this message.

Haaretz read: "Israeli security cabinet member and Agriculture Minister Avi Dichter (Likud) was asked in a news interview on Saturday [Nov. 9, 2023] whether the images of northern Gaza Strip residents evacuating south on the IDF's orders are comparable to pictures of the Nakba. He replied: 'We are now rolling out the Gaza Nakba. From an operational point of view, there is no way to wage a war – as the IDF seeks to do in Gaza – with masses between the tanks and the soldiers.'"
And there are many other recent examples of Israeli officials boldly stating their genocidal intention concerning Gaza and, for that matter, in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, too.

Moreover, the Likud party, which describes itself as conservative and nationalist, has been a staunch promoter of the concept of "Eretz Israel," or the so-called Bible-given right of the Jewish people to the land of Israel.
Per the Jewish Virtual Library, the Likud's original party manifesto in 1977 stated that "between the Sea and the Jordan, there will only be Israeli sovereignty." It also argued that the establishment of a Palestinian state "jeopardizes the security of the Jewish population" and "endangers the existence of the state of Israel."
Therefore, it is the little-known slogan "Between the Sea and the Jordan, there will only be Israeli sovereignty" that denotes a desire to commit genocide. And, as Israel is demonstrating at this moment, it can do so.

 

[LittleGreenMan]

From the opinion piece in question: "In the Middle East, 'Intifada Revolution' and 'From the river to the sea, [Palestine will be free]"' are unambiguously seen as calls for terrorism and the wiping of Israel from the map, so why do ordinarily, ultra-cautious institutions suddenly claim that there might be a more benign meaning?"

Ordinarily, ultra-cautious institutions "suddenly" claim that there might be a more benign meaning because they are ultra-cautious institutions. As such, they matter-of-factly acknowledge that the slogan 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" is nothing more than an expression of the desire of Palestinians to be free of the occupation and accompanying oppression they have suffered since 1948.

In reality, even if Palestinians wished to wipe Israel off the map, it would be a pipe dream, for they haven't the ability to do so. Ergo, the assumption that it is Palestinians who want to wipe Israel off the map is a reflection of the psychological projection exhibited by many Israelis and their supporters. Indeed, with the world's fourth most robust military, complete with roughly 250 illegally produced and deployed theater nuclear warheads, Israel is more than capable of wiping what remains of Palestine off the map. And it is in the process of doing that as I type this message.

Haaretz read: "Israeli security cabinet member and Agriculture Minister Avi Dichter (Likud) was asked in a news interview on Saturday [Nov. 9, 2023] whether the images of northern Gaza Strip residents evacuating south on the IDF's orders are comparable to pictures of the Nakba. He replied: 'We are now rolling out the Gaza Nakba. From an operational point of view, there is no way to wage a war – as the IDF seeks to do in Gaza – with masses between the tanks and the soldiers.'"
And there are many other recent examples of Israeli officials boldly stating their genocidal intention concerning Gaza and, for that matter, in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, too.

Moreover, the Likud party, which describes itself as conservative and nationalist, has been a staunch promoter of the concept of "Eretz Israel," or the so-called Bible-given right of the Jewish people to the land of Israel.
Per the Jewish Virtual Library, the Likud's original party manifesto in 1977 stated that "between the Sea and the Jordan, there will only be Israeli sovereignty." It also argued that the establishment of a Palestinian state "jeopardizes the security of the Jewish population" and "endangers the existence of the state of Israel."
Therefore, it is the little-known slogan "Between the Sea and the Jordan, there will only be Israeli sovereignty" that denotes a desire to commit genocide. And, as Israel is demonstrating at this moment, it can do so.

Too bad you don't have an understanding of the word, "genocide". It is killing as opposed to deporting, a world of difference. The Palestinians have rejected forming a "Palestinian" State 7 times since 1952. There has been no Israeli occupation of Gaza since the last war and the people who live there have not voted since about 2003, thanks to the PLO & Hamas. Whose fault is that? Physician, heal thyself...

 

[the annoying thing]

From the opinion piece in question: "In the Middle East, 'Intifada Revolution' and 'From the river to the sea, [Palestine will be free]"' are unambiguously seen as calls for terrorism and the wiping of Israel from the map, so why do ordinarily, ultra-cautious institutions suddenly claim that there might be a more benign meaning?"

Ordinarily, ultra-cautious institutions "suddenly" claim that there might be a more benign meaning because they are ultra-cautious institutions. As such, they matter-of-factly acknowledge that the slogan 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" is nothing more than an expression of the desire of Palestinians to be free of the occupation and accompanying oppression they have suffered since 1948.

In reality, even if Palestinians wished to wipe Israel off the map, it would be a pipe dream, for they haven't the ability to do so. Ergo, the assumption that it is Palestinians who want to wipe Israel off the map is a reflection of the psychological projection exhibited by many Israelis and their supporters. Indeed, with the world's fourth most robust military, complete with roughly 250 illegally produced and deployed theater nuclear warheads, Israel is more than capable of wiping what remains of Palestine off the map. And it is in the process of doing that as I type this message.

Haaretz read: "Israeli security cabinet member and Agriculture Minister Avi Dichter (Likud) was asked in a news interview on Saturday [Nov. 9, 2023] whether the images of northern Gaza Strip residents evacuating south on the IDF's orders are comparable to pictures of the Nakba. He replied: 'We are now rolling out the Gaza Nakba. From an operational point of view, there is no way to wage a war – as the IDF seeks to do in Gaza – with masses between the tanks and the soldiers.'"
And there are many other recent examples of Israeli officials boldly stating their genocidal intention concerning Gaza and, for that matter, in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, too.

Moreover, the Likud party, which describes itself as conservative and nationalist, has been a staunch promoter of the concept of "Eretz Israel," or the so-called Bible-given right of the Jewish people to the land of Israel.
Per the Jewish Virtual Library, the Likud's original party manifesto in 1977 stated that "between the Sea and the Jordan, there will only be Israeli sovereignty." It also argued that the establishment of a Palestinian state "jeopardizes the security of the Jewish population" and "endangers the existence of the state of Israel."
Therefore, it is the little-known slogan "Between the Sea and the Jordan, there will only be Israeli sovereignty" that denotes a desire to commit genocide. And, as Israel is demonstrating at this moment, it can do so.

Good post .
I work for a college for about 12 years. It was one of the top 100 in the nation.
And that was years ago.we were good and fair to the students but we didn't kiss any ass . We didn't put up with crap from the public either. I have sent plenty of people to jail in California and Florida .
We didn't put up with any racist behavior against Jews blacks Hispanics Latino etc against or by staff or student or the public.Like they do now .
The wild Protest ,blocking traffic, protesting in ft by of stores that go on today .were not tolerated.

 

[the annoying thing]

Too bad you don't have an understanding of the word, "genocide". It is killing as opposed to deporting, a world of difference. The Palestinians have rejected forming a "Palestinian" State 7 times since 1952. There has been no Israeli occupation of Gaza since the last war and the people who live there have not voted since about 2003, thanks to the PLO & Hamas. Whose fault is that? Physician, heal thyself...

You are correct they will never accept a real peace deal or separate nation deal.
They have vowed to take back all the land they consider Palistine.What a lot of people do not consider is if they did would they stop there. Parts of Syria and Lebanon and Egypt are considered former parts of the land they claim.