Here's one for the creationists

[Boris Norris]

I hope you godbotherers don't take it personally but it appears you're wrong.

Inner ear of 6-million-year-old ape fossil reveals clues about the evolution of human movement

phys.org

 

[mark francis]

I hope you godbotherers don't take it personally but it appears you're wrong.

Inner ear of 6-million-year-old ape fossil reveals clues about the evolution of human movement

phys.org

While modern secular researchers claiming to have descended from tree-climbing simians continue their speculations and assumptions about similarities in physical appearances and body parts between humans and animals, we should take a look at what science appears to have proven.

New DNA Sequences of the Y Chromosome Refute Human-Ape Evolution

DNA sequencing technologies have been progressing rapidly over the past several decades and now finally afford the opportunity to analyze mammalian chromosomes from end to end. In the past, many regions of human and ape genomes have been very difficult to fully decipher because older DNA...

www.icr.org

New DNA Sequences of the Y Chromosome Refute Human-Ape Evolution

 

[pjmret]

While modern secular researchers claiming to have descended from tree-climbing simians continue their speculations and assumptions about similarities in physical appearances and body parts between humans and animals, we should take a look at what science appears to have proven.

New DNA Sequences of the Y Chromosome Refute Human-Ape Evolution

DNA sequencing technologies have been progressing rapidly over the past several decades and now finally afford the opportunity to analyze mammalian chromosomes from end to end. In the past, many regions of human and ape genomes have been very difficult to fully decipher because older DNA...

www.icr.org

New DNA Sequences of the Y Chromosome Refute Human-Ape Evolution

we didn't evolve from gibbons. duh.

 

[mark francis]

we didn't evolve from gibbons. duh.

I agree.

 

[pjmret]

I agree.

so this doesn't disprove evolution. duh. lol

 

[mark francis]

so this doesn't disprove evolution. duh. lol

Nothing proves evolution and this evidence does not disprove evolution, but it does disprove a formerly held evolutionist view that has now been debunked.

 

[pjmret]

Nothing proves evolution and this evidence does not disprove evolution, but it does disprove a formerly held evolutionist view that has now been debunked.

scientific theories are never considered fully proven. duh.
including gravity for example.

but are you worried about floating away to space? no? lol

but go on believing a theory that has literally zero proof if you want to look like a science moron

 

[mark francis]

scientific theories are never considered fully proven. duh.
including gravity for example.

but are you worried about floating away to space? no? lol

but go on believing a theory that has literally zero proof if you want to look like a science moron

Exactly. Scientific theories can never be proven, especially the problematic theories of evolution.

 

[pjmret]

Exactly. Scientific theories can never be proven, especially the problematic theories of evolution.

right, but not believing in scientific theories because none of them can be proven is stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

right, but not believing in scientific theories because none of them can be proven is stupid. lol

If refusing to accept unproven speculations as irrefutable facts is deserving of being called stupid, then I am happy to be called stupid.

 

[pjmret]

If refusing to accept unproven speculations as irrefutable facts is deserving of being called stupid, then I am happy to be called stupid.

evolution isn't unknown speculation., nor does anyone say its irrefutable, moron. duh
just like it isn't speculation that you are a science moron.

 

[mark francis]

evolution isn't unknown speculation., nor does anyone say its irrefutable, moron. duh
just like it isn't speculation that you are a science moron.

I know evolution is not an unknown speculation. It is a well-known speculation.

 

[Boris Norris]

While modern secular researchers claiming to have descended from tree-climbing simians continue their speculations and assumptions about similarities in physical appearances and body parts between humans and animals, we should take a look at what science appears to have proven.

New DNA Sequences of the Y Chromosome Refute Human-Ape Evolution

DNA sequencing technologies have been progressing rapidly over the past several decades and now finally afford the opportunity to analyze mammalian chromosomes from end to end. In the past, many regions of human and ape genomes have been very difficult to fully decipher because older DNA...

www.icr.org

New DNA Sequences of the Y Chromosome Refute Human-Ape Evolution

The creation institute?
That wouldn't be biased.
Lots of claims but not one piece of scientific evidence. As usual, you'll believe anything but the truth.

 

[Tripoli]

I hope you godbotherers don't take it personally but it appears you're wrong.

Inner ear of 6-million-year-old ape fossil reveals clues about the evolution of human movement

phys.org

That article says nothing

 

[pjmret]

I know evolution is not an unknown speculation. It is a well-known speculation.

nope, not speculation at all. there is evidence. duh.
you are a science moron