Will AMERICA survive Obama ???

[mark francis]

i claim its not credible, loser. lol.
because you can't convince anyone who is intelligent and independent. duh.
you are an election *****

You claim evidence of massive voter fraud is not credible, yet you cannot say why other than that you simply refuse to believe it.

 

[mark francis]

and yet you never seem to mention"every" crook, just democrats.
you are such a right wing hypocrite lol

My apologies if I gave the impression that I favor crooks be forgiven of their crimes, like Comey forgave Hillary, simply because the crooks may be aligned with the political party I support.

 

[mark francis]

Trump is still trying to convince us there was but in reality he is still interfering in a fair election.

The election cannot be accepted as fair until Democrats disprove evidence of voter fraud they don't want to talk about.

 

[pjmret]

The election cannot be accepted as fair until Democrats disprove evidence of voter fraud they don't want to talk about.

You are free to accept or not accept it. You morons can't be convinced no matter how many court cases you lose. It is silly for Democrats to try and convince you korons of reality

 

[pjmret]

My apologies if I gave the impression that I favor crooks be forgiven of their crimes, like Comey forgave Hillary, simply because the crooks may be aligned with the political party I support.

Crimes aren't forgiven lby the legal system lol
This isn't church try to pay attention

 

[mark francis]

You are free to accept or not accept it. You morons can't be convinced no matter how many court cases you lose. It is silly for Democrats to try and convince you korons of reality

The Democrats claim the election was fair but their inability to disprove a mountain of evidence of voting fraud casts serious doubts on their unsupported claims.

 

[pjmret]

You claim evidence of massive voter fraud is not credible, yet you cannot say why other than that you simply refuse to believe it.

Of course I can say why
I have posted a number of analys3s showing why
You just are too stupid or too lazy

 

[mark francis]

Crimes aren't forgiven lby the legal system lol

Exactly. Comey had no legal authority to forgive Hillary of her violations of federal laws, but he did it anyway like a true leftist swamp monster.

 

[pjmret]

Exactly. Comey had no legal authority to forgive Hillary of her violations of federal laws, but he did it anyway like a true leftist swamp monster.

View attachment 9015


View attachment 9016



View attachment 9017

Nope
He had full legal authority to make charging decisions
You are a legal *****

 

[Boris Norris]

The election cannot be accepted as fair until Democrats disprove evidence of voter fraud they don't want to talk about.

Same old shit. You lost we won.

 

[Boris Norris]

You claim evidence of massive voter fraud is not credible, yet you cannot say why other than that you simply refuse to believe it.

You were the one who claim voter fraud and refuse to believe it's bullshit. Not democrats.

 

[mark francis]

Nope
He had full legal authority to make charging decisions
You are a legal *****

Comey had no legal right to dismiss charges against Hillary. He was not a judge, and he was guilty himself of violating the law against mishandling classified documents, further removing him from appearance of propriety of justice by making any decision about Hillary's criminal violations of the law as well.

The “Comey Standard” for Espionage Act and 18 U.S.C. § 1924 Violations and What It Could Mean for Comey Himself | American Center for Law and Justice (aclj.org) 7-11-17

Setting aside for now the accuracy of Comey’s questionable and convoluted treatment of mens rea jurisprudence or even the propriety of him imposing his own value judgment to nullify the express will of Congress, what is clear from his testimony is that Comey (1) knows both the Espionage Act and 18 U.S.C. § 1924 exist; (2) knows what the laws require; (3) believes that if someone knows the law exists and then violates that law by mishandling classified information, the law is plainly violated; and (4) believes such a knowing violation justifies prosecution.

 

[mark francis]

Same old shit. You lost we won.

A win like Biden's in 2020 is certainly proof that voter fraud can steal elections.

 

[mark francis]

You were the one who claim voter fraud and refuse to believe it's bullshit. Not democrats.

Democrats must refute the evidence of fraud, or their claims of innocence remain unsupported.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats must refute the evidence of fraud, or their claims of innocence remain unsupported.

Nope not how life and the legal system work
Sorry you morons lost