Which FOREIGNER would you consider voting for if Trump didn't run for POTUS in 2024?

[pjmret]

You will only find that list on my pc at home and the several forums I have posted it, you lying scumbag! And for the record, leftist scum don't accept evidence. Lying bastard.

i accept evidence you are a *****!

 

[Yo Daddy!!]

You have no proof of who gave money to whom.
Just another hate filled ignorant rant.

We all need to understand that America's enemies will accuse us of hate filled ignorance when we rightly move to defend our country and our values.

If we cower in the face of these accusations, it provides them their ONLY way to win.

Stay strong.

We do (and must) have each other's backs.

 

[Yo Daddy!!]

Leftist ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.

3a. Play dumb to keep others wasting their time trying to enlighten you.

4. Ridicule spelling and typos, punctuation.

5. Attack the person as being juvenile, ie: "are you 12 years old", question their education, intelligence, Age

6. Employ misdirection,

6a. smear people

6b. attack religion

6c. attack your rationality.

7. Lie, make false assumptions

8. Play race/gender card/misogynist card

9. Play gay/lesbian card

10. Play the Nazi/Fascist/bigot card

11. Make up stuff/So you got nothing?

12. Deny constantly

13. Reword and repeat

14. Pretending not to understand, playing ignorant/what did I lie about

15. When losing, resort to personal attacks.

16. Russia

17. Fox News/ Alex Jones/ Brietbart/ Infowars/ Stormfront/ Gateway/ Hannity/ Rush

18. You can’t read.

19. Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump!

20. Science denier! But men can menstruate and have babies.

Please take it easy on me, Bill.

"ROE" As in Roe VS Wade?

 

[Yo Daddy!!]

I would never vote for a foreigner. After this last presidential election, in which there was no way that senile traitor could have legitimately won, I've cast my last vote.

So, why should anyone take you seriously if you aren't going to follow your own advice to vote for Trump?

 

[pjmret]

Please take it easy on me, Bill.

"ROE" As in Roe VS Wade?

rules of engagement

 

[Phoenix68]

Which FOREIGNER would you consider voting for if Trump didn't run for POTUS in 2024?​

.

.
Shouldn't you have covered this, in Jr. High???
.​

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution sets three qualifications for holding the presidency. To serve as president, one must:

• be a natural-born citizen of the United States;
• be at least 35 years old;
• be a resident in the United States for at least 14 years.

.​

 

[mark francis]

dems lie about putin? lol, how so.

but trump loves him some putin:

At a campaign rally in Georgia over the weekend, the former President, again, praised Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“The smartest one gets to the top,” Trump told the crowd. “That didn’t work so well recently in our country. But they ask me, ‘Is Putin smart?’ Yes, Putin was smart. And I actually thought he was going to be negotiating. I said, ‘That’s a hell of a way to negotiate, put 200,000 soldiers on the border.’”

“They say, ‘Trump said Putin’s smart.’ I mean, he’s taking over a country for two dollars’ worth of sanctions,” Trump told a crowd at a fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago, according to a recording of the event. “I’d say that’s pretty smart. He’s taking over a country – really a vast, vast location, a great piece of land with a lot of people, and just walking right in.”


the last quote proves how stupid trump is as well. lol. "just walking in"...and you morons want him to be CIC of our armed forces?

Trump was diplomatic and knew how to engender friendly relations with even the most hostile of enemy nations. That is not a skill common to Democrats who the world sees as opportunists looking for bribes and favors in order to extend terms of peace in response.

 

[pjmret]

Trump was diplomatic and knew how to engender friendly relations with even the most hostile of enemy nations. That is not a skill common to Democrats who the world sees as opportunists looking for bribes and favors in order to extend terms of peace in response.

hahahahah
hahahahhaha

omg you're so funny.

if by "diplomatic with enemy nations" you mean kissing the rear of dictators, yes.
but otherwise, he ticked off our allies left and right.
only a ***** would call trump "diplomatic" hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahha

 

[mark francis]

You have no proof of who gave money to whom.
Just another hate filled ignorant rant.

Wrong. It is the ignorant who have no proof that Putin gave Clintons money. Here is one example the ignorant must still be ignorant of since they refuse to believe the truth:

When Bill Clinton Was Paid $500,000 to Speak in Russia, Hillary Opposed State Dept. Sanctions (freebeacon.com) 7-18-17

When Bill Clinton Was Paid $500,000 to Speak in Russia, Hillary Opposed State Dept. Sanctions
Hillary Clinton sought to tamp down reports about her opposition to Russia sanctions that coincided with a speech her husband gave in Moscow that landed him half a million dollars.

Hillary Clinton opposed Russia sanctions in 2010 when her husband, former President Bill Clinton, was paid to give a speech at the Russian bank Renaissance Capital, Fox News reports.

 

[pjmret]

Trump was diplomatic and knew how to engender friendly relations with even the most hostile of enemy nations. That is not a skill common to Democrats who the world sees as opportunists looking for bribes and favors in order to extend terms of peace in response.

Indeed, among all of Trump’s foreign-policy legacies, none may be more consequential than the damage he has done to America’s standing, influence, and power in the world by weakening the system of partnerships and alliances the country has created and relied on for decades. A world without U.S. leadership is no longer some vague and lamentable future possibility.Since the start of his presidency, Trump has abandoned multiple treaties and agreements, undermined the credibility of U.S. defense guarantees, bullied and belittled allies, and cozied up to dictators who threaten those allies and the United States.

Present at the Destruction of U.S. Power and Influence

Four years of neglect, unilateralism, and failed diplomacy have left America’s alliances in tatters. It’s time to rebuild them.

foreignpolicy.com

yiou're a political *****

 

[mark francis]

hahahahah
hahahahhaha

omg you're so funny.

if by "diplomatic with enemy nations" you mean kissing the rear of dictators, yes.
but otherwise, he ticked off our allies left and right.
only a ***** would call trump "diplomatic" hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahha

Detente is not, as the unlearned and confused may wrongly think, kissing the rears of foreign leaders. Trump's thawing of relations with foreign leaders is called detente. Biden's foreign relations with some leaders is called quid pro quo, influence peddling, bribery, or azz kidding.

 

[pjmret]

Detente is not, as the unlearned and confused may wrongly think, kissing the rears of foreign leaders. Trump's thawing of relations with foreign leaders is called detente. Biden's foreign relations with some leaders is called quid pro quo, influence peddling, bribery, or azz kidding.

no its not, but trump cozied up to dictators, as the link I posted said.

i believe the foreign policy link which has actual experts, not a lying partisan like you.

 

[mark francis]

Indeed, among all of Trump’s foreign-policy legacies, none may be more consequential than the damage he has done to America’s standing, influence, and power in the world by weakening the system of partnerships and alliances the country has created and relied on for decades. A world without U.S. leadership is no longer some vague and lamentable future possibility.Since the start of his presidency, Trump has abandoned multiple treaties and agreements, undermined the credibility of U.S. defense guarantees, bullied and belittled allies, and cozied up to dictators who threaten those allies and the United States.

Present at the Destruction of U.S. Power and Influence

Four years of neglect, unilateralism, and failed diplomacy have left America’s alliances in tatters. It’s time to rebuild them.

foreignpolicy.com

yiou're a political *****

You are really full of it. What damage did Trump do in US relations with North Korea? What damage in our relations with Russia did Trump cause? How about our relations with Israel, what damage did he do there? In fact, what damage did he do to US relations anywhere except maybe between the US and Iran or the US and Hezbollah or between the US and Al Queda?

 

[pjmret]

Detente is not, as the unlearned and confused may wrongly think, kissing the rears of foreign leaders. Trump's thawing of relations with foreign leaders is called detente. Biden's foreign relations with some leaders is called quid pro quo, influence peddling, bribery, or azz kidding.

Donald Trump does not have a foreign policy; he has moods regarding international affairs. Underneath the volatility of his moods, however, are some convictions: namely that other countries are robbing the U.S. through trade; U.S. allies are at best incapable of defending themselves and unwilling to spend resources in order to do so; multilateralism is for the weak; and widespread application of U.S. military power to underpin the prevailing international order is a wasted and failed endeavor. In many respects, these convictions are fundamentally wrong: over the long term, the U.S. has benefited enormously from commitment to open trade, alliances beyond immediate transactional quid-pro-quo, multilateral international order, and U.S. global power projection.

The real tragedy of Trump’s inability to recognize these facts is the negative consequences that his failed foreign affairs beliefs and choices frequently have for those affected by them. Trump simply makes a lot of bad foreign policy decisions that hurt everyone from U.S. domestic consumers to businesses with international supply chains to leaders of U.S. allies in Europe and the Indo-Pacific. And for some foreign policy decisions—such as the abrogation of the Iran deal, or engagement with North Korea—the jury is still out. Nonetheless, occasionally, Trump’s convictions feed instincts leading him to decisions that are fundamentally right. Ironically, however, even when Trump makes ostensibly good foreign policy choices, he executes them so badly, or approaches them from such a chaotic and skewed vantage point, that even those who normally would support the policy in question end up obliged to reject it. A cursory examination of three of Trump’s major international priorities—relationships with allies, the war in Syria, and U.S.-China trade relations—is indicative of this incongruous dynamic.

The Tragic Irony of Donald Trump’s Foreign Policy - Foreign Policy Research Institute

Donald Trump does not have a foreign policy; he has moods regarding international affairs. Underneath the volatility of his moods, however, are some convictions: namely that other countries are robbing the U.S. through trade; U.S. allies are at best incapable of defending themselves and...

www.fpri.org

 

[pjmret]

You are really full of it. What damage did Trump do in US relations with North Korea? What damage in our relations with Russia did Trump cause? How about our relations with Israel, what damage did he do there? In fact, what damage did he do to US relations anywhere except maybe between the US and Iran or the US and Hezbollah or between the US and Al Queda?

so the experts are wrong and you are right?
hahahahahah
hahahahahahahahhahahahah

read the links, *****, and educate yourself, or continue to look stupid