revolution4PAUL
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2008
- Messages
- 77
Singing Cumbaya is a great idea but didn't work.
I don't see what gives you that impression. What I'm simply saying is that the people don't need to put their selves into this class system, all we need to do is vote for whom we feel electable.
Sharing a coke with the world didn't work either.I'm not following your logic behind singing 'Cumbaya' and sharing a coke with the world.
It's not so easy. Free thinking and belief in your own value system can differ greatly depending on demographics as well as religion, culture, etc.
There is nothing wrong with diversity is there? I still don't see your point.
What will you do when a group decides that their way of free thinking is better than yours? Appease their rights to free thought?
What I would do is listen to what they have to say and that will help me better understand what I stand for. The more diversity the better and it gives you different perspectives to look at and not your innately biased own. Let us understand each other better while being civil. Let yourself be wrong because no one is infallible. If someone else is more logical and makes sense than its ok to adapt or partially adapt their opinion on the subject.
Also, what are you going to do with those who are a lot older than you are, who grew up and lived a great deal of their lives in a much different society than exists today (at least in America, since that's all I know about in practice), whose idea of free thinking doesn't jive with your definition? Who gets to define free thinking?
Same as above. Let us evolve each other towards truth and not classify ourselves and put up walls between us. Why do we have to vote democrat or republican? Why can't these people have their own ideas and just listen to them and base our opinions by that.
No one gets to define free thinking, it depends on the viewer to come up with his own definition of the word. But it would be something like "the ability to listen to others and take heed where you deem important. The use of YOUR mind to draw your own conclusions. Being a leader not a follower."
Don't get me wrong, your idea is right both morally and politically,and I applaud you for even caring, however, what you are advocating is akin to anarchy in reality. How do you correlate that to anarchy? Do you deem anarchy as "your idea is right both morally and politically,and I applaud you for even caring." I don't see how you can applaud something that you believe is related to anarchy. This is not anarchy, its being a leader and following your OWN path to truth.
If a definition of global free thinking ever comes to be, then all has been lost to coerced conformity, which defeats the purpose.
What is the purpose? Who's purpose are you referring to? I do not know any ultimate goal of civilization as a whole. What makes you so hubris to say that 'free thinking' defeats the "purpose". Why should we have 'coerced conformity' ? I say F*ck conformity, I thought everyone was an individual.
Why do we have to conform? You are your own person, you are beautiful, you are an individual, so cherish it. Cherish yourself and your right to have your own mind-'free think'. Embrace yourself and look for truth. Learn your rights before they are taken away because of your ignorance. The truth will set you free.
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~