The law demands the names of ineligible voters be removed, it does not say no names should be removed if some corrupt disgruntled political party hack claims mistakes might be made in the process.
We should expect corrupted voters and election officials might complain that inserting election security measures causes them too much trouble and discomfort when voting.
Taking up collections from illegals has vever been authorized by Congress as a legal means of granting illegals American citizenship status.
What fraction of mistakes is acceptable to you as a cost for removing names, assuming no other more efficient methods is available?
The law makes no exceptions for possible mistakes when removing illegitimate names from bloated voting rolls, perhaps because lawmakers knew any person whose name was accidentally removed could easily remedy the situation by re-registering.
As usual you evaded a legitimate question. IMO it is most likely because you do not have the intellectual capacity of understanding the questions much less answering them. Evasion and playing dumb is your natural defense.
The law says purged the books of illegitimate names. Americans want election officials to obey the laws and stop screwing around making stupid excuses for why they will not obey the law.
But valid voters were removed illegally
Some may have been mistakenly removed but legitimate voters can easily have their names re-entered by re-registering. None of the few mistaken removals should be invalidly used as an excuse for disobeying the law.
The fact remains that TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION was a core value of the American Revolution.
