Voting fraud supporters sue GA officials for removing non-citizens from voting rolls

[mark francis]

Yes m8ndlessly
Instead of checking first they are just taking them off mindlessly

They are violating the law by removing legitimate voters as you just admitted

The law demands the names of ineligible voters be removed, it does not say no names should be removed if some corrupt disgruntled political party hack claims mistakes might be made in the process.

 

[mark francis]

Yes more effort can be a barrier
Officials shouldn't violate the law by removing legal voters

We should expect corrupted voters and election officials might complain that inserting election security measures causes them too much trouble and discomfort when voting.

 

[mark francis]

What was one of the main grievances of the Colonists against the British?

TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!

And even though millions of people you call "illegals" pay their taxes, you want to deny them the vote.

Trump paid ZERO taxes for years, he claims they are still auditing his 2015 tax returns. And he thinks he has the right to beg the GA Secretary of State for over ELEVEN THOUSAND VOTES that he did not receive?

You make no sense.

Taking up collections from illegals has vever been authorized by Congress as a legal means of granting illegals American citizenship status.

 

[Randomguy]

The law demands the names of ineligible voters be removed, it does not say no names should be removed if some corrupt disgruntled political party hack claims mistakes might be made in the process.

What fraction of mistakes is acceptable to you as a cost for removing names, assuming no other more efficient methods is available?

None ? (Yeah sure!)
10% ?
50% ?
> 50% ?

I am sure as usual you would consider legitimate questions that you cannot answer as gotcha questions and start evading and squirming.

 

[mark francis]

What fraction of mistakes is acceptable to you as a cost for removing names, assuming no other more efficient methods is available?

None ? (Yeah sure!)
10% ?
50% ?
> 50% ?

I am sure as usual you would consider legitimate questions that you cannot answer as gotcha questions and start evading and squirming.

The law makes no exceptions for possible mistakes when removing illegitimate names from bloated voting rolls, perhaps because lawmakers knew any person whose name was accidentally removed could easily remedy the situation by re-registering.

 

[Randomguy]

The law makes no exceptions for possible mistakes when removing illegitimate names from bloated voting rolls, perhaps because lawmakers knew any person whose name was accidentally removed could easily remedy the situation by re-registering.

As usual you evaded a legitimate question. IMO it is most likely because you do not have the intellectual capacity of understanding the questions much less answering them. Evasion and playing dumb is your natural defense.

 

[mark francis]

As usual you evaded a legitimate question. IMO it is most likely because you do not have the intellectual capacity of understanding the questions much less answering them. Evasion and playing dumb is your natural defense.

The law says purged the books of illegitimate names. Americans want election officials to obey the laws and stop screwing around making stupid excuses for why they will not obey the law.

 

[pjmret]

The law demands the names of ineligible voters be removed, it does not say no names should be removed if some corrupt disgruntled political party hack claims mistakes might be made in the process.

But valid voters were removed illegally

 

[mark francis]

But valid voters were removed illegally

Some may have been mistakenly removed but legitimate voters can easily have their names re-entered by re-registering. None of the few mistaken removals should be invalidly used as an excuse for disobeying the law.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Taking up collections from illegals has vever been authorized by Congress as a legal means of granting illegals American citizenship status.

The fact remains that TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION was a core value of the American Revolution.
Even SLAVES were represented as 3/5th of a citizen for purposes of congressional representation.

For over 100 years, people could enter this county unrestricted, settle down, and become citizens. They could stroll down from New Brunswick and Ontario, and trot in from Tamaulipas, Nuevo Leon and Coahuila.

 

[pjmret]

Some may have been mistakenly removed but legitimate voters can easily have their names re-entered by re-registering. None of the few mistaken removals should be invalidly used as an excuse for disobeying the law.

Mistakenly no
No attempt was made to not do that
That's negligence not mistake

 

[mark francis]

Mistakenly no
No attempt was made to not do that
That's negligence not mistake

Even if some mistakes were made why do Democrats try to make such mistakes grounds for disobeying the law? Do Democrats believe the few mistakes cannot be remedied without totally ignoring and disobeying the law?

 

[pjmret]

Even if some mistakes were made why do Democrats try to make such mistakes grounds for disobeying the law? Do Democrats believe the few mistakes cannot be remedied without totally ignoring and disobeying the law?

It's not a mistake if you don't try to do it right
It's negligence or intentional
God you are stupid

 

[Randomguy]

The fact remains that TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION was a core value of the American Revolution.
Even SLAVES were represented as 3/5th of a citizen for purposes of congressional representation.

For over 100 years, people could enter this county unrestricted, settle down, and become citizens. They could stroll down from New Brunswick and Ontario, and trot in from Tamaulipas, Nuevo Leon and Coahuila.

Taking up collections from illegals has vever been authorized by Congress as a legal means of granting illegals American citizenship status.

So what?

If you use them for, say, cheap labor, imo they should be granted citizenship down the road.

 

[mark francis]

It's not a mistake if you don't try to do it right
It's negligence or intentional
God you are stupid

You are suggesting that election officials totally reject and disobey election laws they unilaterally think unfairly impact a small percentage of voters.