Pandora
Well-Known Member
Looking over the case, I don't see anything at all about her being able to eat, but forbidden to do so. The controversy seems to center around removal of the feeding tube.
If she was, indeed, able to eat, then I'll have to agree that forcing her to starve was inhumane at least and murder at worst.
Do you have a link?
It was reported on in the news, her parents crying outside of the courthouse because the judge would not let them try to feed her by mouth. Had Terri not been able to swollow she would have died choking on her own spit years before the judge and her husband starved her to death. she ate all of her meals by mouth till the husband had the tube put in to save money.
I am looking for a link for you