Threat to democracy

How is allowing non citizens to vote democratic?


Dems pushing to keep 1600 non citizens on the voting rolls in Virginia. How do we know they are not citizens? The people themselves said so!

Biden-Harris administration sues to force them on the rolls and a libtard judge agrees with them.

Should we be handing out ballots in other countries as well?
 
Werbung:
I'm not arguing that Kamala is not a legit candidate or a legal candidate. I just think it takes a lot of hutzpah for dems to keep talking about democracy when they have a candidate who did not get a vote.

Biden was not sidelined by an unexpected stroke or coma. They would have never wanted him to step down if he was ahead in the polls. He was pressured to step down because he was going to lose.

Libtards said that Biden was fine mentally. The corporate media pushed that lie.









They called the idea that Biden is mentally unfit a "Russian misinformation" tactic.
Jan 6
That's why the threat about democracy is talked about by democrats
Trump is under indictment forbit
Duh

The democrat nomination process given the circumstances was nothing like that
The she didn't get a vote argument is stupid given the circumstances

So yes the dems have a legitimate reason to talk about it
 
How is allowing non citizens to vote democratic?


Dems pushing to keep 1600 non citizens on the voting rolls in Virginia. How do we know they are not citizens? The people themselves said so!

Biden-Harris administration sues to force them on the rolls and a libtard judge agrees with them.

Should we be handing out ballots in other countries as well?
The Constitution does not limit voting to citizens
 
What democrats did was legal. Had Biden died Kamala would have become president without getting a vote.

Still his stepping down was more about being behind in the polls than concerns over his mental acuity.

It is a bit galling that democrats are the ones lecturing about democracy.
What part of what you quoted was not democratic?

“Still” what you described above is compatible with democracy.
 
You nailed it. Anybody who has an issue with it will be called a racist and a Nazi.
Not at all.

I have no idea how being a Nazi or racist is directly related to the belief that Harris was not elected democratically.

Those who claim Harris was not elected democratically are either incompetent or trying to gaslight democratic base.
 
Oh really? So you think 4,000 people just all happened to vote for Kamala on their own? Just 4,000 people in complete lock step without any sort of marching orders from above? Not a single one of them liked Newsom, not a single one of them like Whitmer, not a single one of them liked Buttigieg. All 4,000 went for Kamala completely independent of each other?

With all due respect, anyone who believes that is just a total *****.
Unless you agree all near unanimous votes are illegitimate your argument above is nonsense.

I suspect Trump mostly won his primaries near unanimously.

Many a times house republicans vote near unanimously. That is a feature of parties and does not point to undemocratic practices.

Perhaps delegates voted for Harris because they believed she was the best candidate, the most viable candidate. As much as a Trump supporter wanna gaslight dems and tell them some of them should have voted for someone other than Harris, that juvenile tactic should not and did not work.
Thank you for agreeing that not a single member of the rank 'n file democrat party voted for her. Or voted for any delegates who would be pledged to her.
People voted for delegates and delegates for Harris.
 
I am clearly saying that voters pick electors who then vote
Just like how political parties work
Neither is based 9n winn8ng the popular vote duh
God you are stupid
It's the democrat way. A few democrat officials get elected and they then appoint radical leftist fascists to rape, pillage, destroy and kill in their stead while they claim they did nothing wrong.
 
It's the democrat way. A few democrat officials get elected and they then appoint radical leftist fascists to rape, pillage, destroy and kill in their stead while they claim they did nothing wrong.
No worries. If your anti America candidate wins he will jail if not execute all these lefties fascists whom you want to get rid of. People like pelosi mattis Schiff his generals his attorney generals etc etc etc. and before that he will outlaw cbs msnbc abc newspapers etc etc etc.
 
What part of what you quoted was not democratic?
The part where a small number of party leaders selected the nominee.

I have asked you this 3 times, and you have, in true cowardly fashion, refused to answer. If Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and Nancy Pelosi got together and selected the next President of the United States, is that democracy in action?

Answer the question, coward.
 
Unless you agree all near unanimous votes are illegitimate your argument above is nonsense.

I suspect Trump mostly won his primaries near unanimously.
Trump did not win the nomination unanimously, but thank you for putting your ignorance on display for all to see.
Perhaps delegates voted for Harris because they believed she was the best candidate, the most viable candidate.
The notion that 4,000 people independently all decided Harris was the best nominee is something only a complete m*ron could believe. Not a single one like Newsom, not a single one liked Buttigieg, not a single one liked Whitmer....
 
How is allowing non citizens to vote democratic?


Dems pushing to keep 1600 non citizens on the voting rolls in Virginia. How do we know they are not citizens? The people themselves said so!

Biden-Harris administration sues to force them on the rolls and a libtard judge agrees with them.

Should we be handing out ballots in other countries as well?
Agreed 100% - and anyone claiming Harris won the nomination by a fair, free and open democratic process is just trying to gaslight everyone else.

Fortunately, none of us are stupid enough to be fooled by it.
 
If we completely canceled the voting taking place November 5 (and also canceled the early voting already underway in several states) and appointed Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and Nancy Pelosi in charge of deciding the next President, and they voted 3-0 in favor of Harris, then according to your moronic logic, Harris was "elected" President.

Meanwhile, the way 99.999% of America uses the word "elected," it does not include the ham-fisted, borderline-corrupt nomination process that resulted in Harris being the nominee.

You know I'm right.
o
Agreed 100% - and anyone claiming Harris won the nomination by a fair, free and open democratic process is just trying to gaslight everyone else.

Fortunately, none of us are stupid enough to be fooled by it.
If you are stupid enough to be a fan of Trump, your stupidity is severe.
 
The part where a small number of party leaders selected the nominee.

I have asked you this 3 times, and you have, in true cowardly fashion, refused to answer. If Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and Nancy Pelosi got together and selected the next President of the United States, is that democracy in action?

Answer the question, coward.
- She was not selected. She was elected. There is coverage of her election.
- your question was nonsensical since that is not what happened. but here is your answer: no, that is not democratic but that is not what happened.
- you should ask yourself: why do I feel the need to insult and to make ad-hominem comments? If you refrain from insulting , maybe you will get more answers, even to your nonsensical questions.
 
Werbung:
Trump did not win the nomination unanimously, but thank you for putting your ignorance on display for all to see.

The notion that 4,000 people independently all decided Harris was the best nominee is something only a complete m*ron could believe. Not a single one like Newsom, not a single one liked Buttigieg, not a single one liked Whitmer....
That word “near” must have irritated you to hell. That shows the quality of your arguments.

And I gave an explanation for your 4000 nonsensical argument. your ignored it and then went on to repeat the same nonsensical argument.
 
Back
Top