Because ***** as we pointed out many times to you but you are too stupid to understand or something that's not what judges do the fact that you make that comment proves that you are legal ***** LOLNo judge has ever disproven 2020 fraud
Because ***** as we pointed out many times to you but you are too stupid to understand or something that's not what judges do the fact that you make that comment proves that you are legal ***** LOLNo judge has ever disproven 2020 fraud
Judges have not ruled no voter fraud occurred because that is not their job. OK. Nobody has proved evidence of fraud is not fraud.Because ***** as we pointed out many times to you but you are too stupid to understand or something that's not what judges do the fact that you make that comment proves that you are legal ***** LOL
Judges have not ruled no voter fraud occurred because that is not their job. OK. Nobody has proved evidence of fraud is not fraud.
If judges did not thoroughly investigate the evidence then their ruling is worthless.judges have ruled the "evidence" isn't credible. that's how the world works, *****.
burden of proof is on you, and when you lose every single case, only a true ***** would continue to believe in the "stolen election" lol
its why defendents dont have to prove they are innocent. duh. prosecutors have to prove they are guilty.
maybe in russia your worldview works?![]()
I agree and am still wondering why you won't accept it. Trump is about to go to jail for being an arsehole liar and traitor, yet youre still bellowing about his innocence.Truth can be disbelieved and assaulted by mobs numbering in the millions but truth is never wrong.
If judges did not thoroughly investigate the evidence then their ruling is worthless.
Tens of millions of Americans know Trump is not a traitor.I agree and am still wondering why you won't accept it. Trump is about to go to jail for being an arsehole liar and traitor, yet youre still bellowing about his innocence.
You must be mentally ill.
Judges considered the cases and then ruled the plaintiffs had no grounds to sue.nope, unless you claim all rulings are worthless, *****. lol.
judges evaluate the evidence provided to them, *****. and rule.
they don't "investigate thoroughly" anything, that's the job of the person claiming fraud. duh
so..are all rulings worthless? duh
In some cases yesJudges considered the cases and then ruled the plaintiffs had no grounds to sue.
Believe, not knowTens of millions of Americans know Trump is not a traitor.
Under crooked rules Americans have no rights to seek investigations into evidence of election theft by fraud.In some cases yes
Be ause they had no right to sue duh
Being unhappy doesn't give you a right to sue *****
Other judges ruled the evidence wasn't credible
It's how you morons lost over 60 cases lol
Heathen rebels believe they will never have to give an answer to God while godly Christians know all will appear before God.Believe, not know
Words have meanings *****
Not true *****Under crooked rules Americans have no rights to seek investigations into evidence of election theft by fraud.
Nothing to do with my pist ***** lolHeathen rebels believe they will never have to give an answer to God while godly Christians know all will appear before God.
That's not enough though because 81 million thought he was.Tens of millions of Americans know Trump is not a traitor.