The unethical, immoral, unjust, Trump-hating, election interfering, leftist Democrat lawfare prosecutor is now under investigation for her crimes

[mark francis]

slavery received important protections in the Constitution. The notorious three-fifths clause—which counted three-fifths of a state’s slave population in apportioning representation—gave the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. Thomas Jefferson would have lost the election of 1800 if not for the Three-fifths Compromise. The Constitution also prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years. A fugitive slave clause required the return of runaway slaves to their owners. The Constitution gave the federal government the power to put down domestic rebellions, including slave insurrections.

Slavery protected by Christians. Disgusting

Lawmakers may have thrown the ungodly slave owners a bone or two but Christians who walked with God did not condone the wicked inhumanity of slavery.

 

[pjmret]

You do not prove anything about the many or few who were most responsible for that wording and, furthermore, nothing in that wording encouraged or condones slavery. At most the wording simply assumes or acknowledges slavery, like a modern Republican bill may acknowledge black racism without condoning it.

there is no doubt that they were talking about slaves. what else doesn't fall into the category of "free people"? duh. lol.

you just make yourself look more and more like a history incompetent. but you do you

 

[pjmret]

Lawmakers may have thrown the ungodly slave owners a bone or two but Christians who walked with God did not condone the wicked inhumanity of slavery.

a bone or two? they had huge protections directly in the constitution. duh.

you love looking like a history incompetent.

 

[Boris Norris]

That is exactly what Trump meant, contrary to Democrat misinterpretations and misrepresentations.

View attachment 11185

What he meant is not documented anywhere. What he said is documented.
You're trying to sanitise Trump's racketeering as some normal election process. Georgia state who has more brains than you, didn't see it that way.

 

[Boris Norris]

Lawmakers may have thrown the ungodly slave owners a bone or two but Christians who walked with God did not condone the wicked inhumanity of slavery.

Walk with god. What a load of rubbish.

 

[mark francis]

there is no doubt that they were talking about slaves. what else doesn't fall into the category of "free people"? duh. lol.

you just make yourself look more and more like a history incompetent. but you do you

Until you acknowledge the fact of strong Christian opposition to slavery throughout the early days of the US your arguments must be deemed biased and tainted by bias.

 

[mark francis]

a bone or two? they had huge protections directly in the constitution. duh.

you love looking like a history incompetent.

Like modern compromisers, those early Americans who opposed slavery may have made some concessions to achieve 'bipartisanship' with the ungodly slave owners, but Christians with unyielding convictions would have never joined the compromising crowd.

 

[pjmret]

Until you acknowledge the fact of strong Christian opposition to slavery throughout the early days of the US your arguments must be deemed biased and tainted by bias.

"strong'? meaningless given how much slavery was put into the constitution.
they weren't very strong or that wouldnt' have happened. duh

 

[mark francis]

What he meant is not documented anywhere. What he said is documented.
You're trying to sanitise Trump's racketeering as some normal election process. Georgia state who has more brains than you, didn't see it that way.

Democrats misunderstood him and misinterpreted him and the internet filled with those false misrepresentations, deluding millions of simple-minded rubes.

 

[pjmret]

Like modern compromisers, those early Americans who opposed slavery may have made some concessions to achieve 'bipartisanship' with the ungodly slave owners, but Christians with unyielding convictions would have never joined the compromising crowd.

"some concessions"? nope. slavery was well protected.
christians put slavery in the constitution, no matter how much you try to weasel out of admitting it. lol

 

[mark francis]

"strong'? meaningless given how much slavery was put into the constitution.
they weren't very strong or that wouldnt' have happened. duh

You should stop suggesting Christians did not oppose slavery in the early days of the US. I can post dozens of historical records proving Christians were strong outspoken opponents of slavery from the earliest days.

Earliest American Protest Against Slavery (February, 1688, Drawn up by Mennonite Germans) | Encyclopedia.com

Earliest American Protest Against Slavery (February, 1688, Drawn Up By Mennonite Germans)

EARLIEST AMERICAN PROTEST AGAINST SLAVERY (February, 1688, Drawn up by Mennonite Germans)

---

William Penn's establishment of the principle of religious toleration in his proprietorship of Pennsylvania attracted a variety of religious sects from Europe. Along with the Quakers, Moravians, Lutherans, and Dunkers were the Mennonites, a strongly cohesive group that practiced a basic form of Christianity focusing on simplicity, individualism, hard work, and prayer. These German immigrants believed that all humans were equal, being children of God the Creator. They practiced toleration in all of its forms. They opposed any restrictions on human rights and liberty.

 

[mark francis]

"some concessions"? nope. slavery was well protected.
christians put slavery in the constitution, no matter how much you try to weasel out of admitting it. lol

I'm sure leftists, future Democrats, strongly supported slavery from the earliest days of this country.

 

[pjmret]

You should stop suggesting Christians did not oppose slavery in the early days of the US. I can post dozens of historical records proving Christians were strong outspoken opponents of slavery from the earliest days.

Earliest American Protest Against Slavery (February, 1688, Drawn up by Mennonite Germans) | Encyclopedia.com

Earliest American Protest Against Slavery (February, 1688, Drawn Up By Mennonite Germans)

EARLIEST AMERICAN PROTEST AGAINST SLAVERY (February, 1688, Drawn up by Mennonite Germans)

---

William Penn's establishment of the principle of religious toleration in his proprietorship of Pennsylvania attracted a variety of religious sects from Europe. Along with the Quakers, Moravians, Lutherans, and Dunkers were the Mennonites, a strongly cohesive group that practiced a basic form of Christianity focusing on simplicity, individualism, hard work, and prayer. These German immigrants believed that all humans were equal, being children of God the Creator. They practiced toleration in all of its forms. They opposed any restrictions on human rights and liberty.

i didn't say "christians" didn't oppose it, since no doubt some did. duh.
but overall christians dominated this country and put it into the constitution.

 

[pjmret]

I'm sure leftists, future Democrats, strongly supported slavery from the earliest days of this country.

you are sure of many things which are stupid. lol.
slavery was supported by conservatives (those wanting to keep the country as it was, retaining slavery), future republicans.
you are a history incompetent

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats misunderstood him and misinterpreted him and the internet filled with those false misrepresentations, deluding millions of simple-minded rubes.

Democrats weren't judging him. It was govt authorities. Try to keep up and make your posts relative.
You're one of the rubes that were fooled by Trump bullshyt.