The unethical, immoral, unjust, Trump-hating, election interfering, leftist Democrat lawfare prosecutor is now under investigation for her crimes

Trump suggested he should look through the 200,000 or so unverified ballots to see if he could not find at least 12,000 of them to be bogus, thus flipping the race from Biden back to him. I think that was a totally reasonable and perfectly legal request.
Do you? Of course you would. Why do you suggest they weren't counted correctly in the first place?
The fact is, Trump wanted him to FIND the votes, not re check them. Why are you inventing scenarios which are proven to be false. The phone is quite clear.
It's called racketeering and he's been charged for it. It's a jail offence.
 
Werbung:
Trump suggested he should look through the 200,000 or so unverified ballots to see if he could not find at least 12,000 of them to be bogus, thus flipping the race from Biden back to him. I think that was a totally reasonable and perfectly legal request.
Quote where Trump said that or admit you lied
 
Are you claiming Trump did not suggest that Raffensperger could look through all the questionable ballots and find at least 11,000 that were illegitimate?
That is not what trump said. He never mentioned there was questionable votes. He simply asked him to find them.
 
No, slavery was absolutely not established or condoned in the Constitution. Here are irrefutable facts and arguments:

Bing Videos

Opinion | Constitutionally, Slavery Is No National Institution - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Constitutionally, Slavery Is No National Institution

sure it was. officially in the constituion. duh. you should read it sometime. lol

Nevertheless, slavery received important protections in the Constitution. The notorious three-fifths clause—which counted three-fifths of a state’s slave population in apportioning representation—gave the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. Thomas Jefferson would have lost the election of 1800 if not for the Three-fifths Compromise. The Constitution also prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years. A fugitive slave clause required the return of runaway slaves to their owners. The Constitution gave the federal government the power to put down domestic rebellions, including slave insurrections.

duh
 
Are you claiming Trump did not suggest that Raffensperger could look through all the questionable ballots and find at least 11,000 that were illegitimate?

i am saying he didn't say what you said he did. he didn't mention 200,000 votes anywhere, unless you can quote him.
but you'll never admit you lied, even when its obvious. lol
 
sure it was. officially in the constituion. duh. you should read it sometime. lol

Nevertheless, slavery received important protections in the Constitution. The notorious three-fifths clause—which counted three-fifths of a state’s slave population in apportioning representation—gave the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. Thomas Jefferson would have lost the election of 1800 if not for the Three-fifths Compromise. The Constitution also prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years. A fugitive slave clause required the return of runaway slaves to their owners. The Constitution gave the federal government the power to put down domestic rebellions, including slave insurrections.

duh
No, slavery is neither encouraged nor condoned in the Constitution.
 
i am saying he didn't say what you said he did. he didn't mention 200,000 votes anywhere, unless you can quote him.
but you'll never admit you lied, even when its obvious. lol
Trump did not mention the fact that there were hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots EA2020 votes in Georgia. He simply suggested to Raffensperger that surely he could examine the unverified votes to see if at least 12,000 of them or so were invalid
Sure it was condoned by clauses like I posted duh
Christians intentionally put slavery in
You must enjoy looking stupid
No, Christians put nothing in the Constitution to support or condone slavery.
 
Trump did not mention the fact that there were hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots EA2020 votes in Georgia. He simply suggested to Raffensperger that surely he could examine the unverified votes to see if at least 12,000 of them or so were invalid

No, Christians put nothing in the Constitution to support or condone slavery.
Where did he say unverified? Quote him



Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons

That is about slaves. Duh. Put there by Christians duh
 
Trump did not mention the fact that there were hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots EA2020 votes in Georgia. He simply suggested to Raffensperger that surely he could examine the unverified votes to see if at least 12,000 of them or so were invalid

No, Christians put nothing in the Constitution to support or condone slavery.
slavery received important protections in the Constitution. The notorious three-fifths clause—which counted three-fifths of a state’s slave population in apportioning representation—gave the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. Thomas Jefferson would have lost the election of 1800 if not for the Three-fifths Compromise. The Constitution also prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years. A fugitive slave clause required the return of runaway slaves to their owners. The Constitution gave the federal government the power to put down domestic rebellions, including slave insurrections.

Slavery protected by Christians. Disgusting
 
Werbung:
Where did he say unverified? Quote him



Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons

That is about slaves. Duh. Put there by Christians duh
You do not prove anything about the many or few who were most responsible for that wording and, furthermore, nothing in that wording encouraged or condones slavery. At most the wording simply assumes or acknowledges slavery, like a modern Republican bill may acknowledge black racism without condoning it.
 
Back
Top