Now, it appears, that you're saying that no one is claiming that the climate is not changing. It seems it is you, not the scientists, who are changing their tune.
Either you're being dishonest, are having a senior moment, or a reading comprehension problem.... Let's go back to something Pale posted earlier:
So hear is a chart showing what the climate of the earth has looked like back through the murky mists of time. Take a good look at it and tell me if you see anything scary there or a pattern that might indicate that the rise of man has somehow caused the climate to deviate from its eternal cycle. Tell me how a thinking person could look at this, taking note of where we are, at present, on the graph and put any creedence at all in the absolutely bogus claims being made by climate science. Ask PLC if he sees anything there that might cause him to think that man is causing anything within the climate that might be reasonably called unprecedented.
Well gee wiz Wally.... It appears the global climate has been warming and cooling, i.e. "changing" forever. Strange that Pale would point out all this "Climate Change" since, according to you, he doesn't believe the climate ever changes....
and yet the first name you mention is "on the climate change wagon."
There's a difference between natural climate cycles (Pales position) and Anthropogenic(Man Caused) Global Warming (Your position) - Apparently you just can't tell the difference between the two.
What kind of SUV's were humans driving 4,570 million years ago at the end of the Precambrian age? They must have been like Mega-Dinosaur sized Super-Hummers or something. Clearly mankind had to have produced insane amounts of CO2 to cause all that warming because, according to Warmers, CO2 produced by humans is the reason the earth warms.
...
Since 1998, more than 31,000 American scientists, have signed a public petition announcing their belief that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”
...
As Joseph Bast who heads the Heartland Institute points out, “It is important to distinguish between the statement, which is true, that there is no scientific consensus that AGW [anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming] is or will be a catastrophe, and the also-true claims that the climate is changing (of course it is, it is always changing), and that most scientists believe there may be a human impact on climate (our emissions and alterations of the landscape are surely having an impact, though they are often local or regional (like heat islands) and small relative to natural variation).”
