The Court ruled against Democrat voting fraud law in Michigan

[pjmret]

Democrats "fight like hell" against every voting security measure while demanding people simply take them at their unverified word that they would never commitm fraud. Amewricans have to be pretty slow to think democrats oppose election securities because they would never commit voting fraud.

americans would be pretty slow to believe you idiots claims of fraud since you couldn't win a single court case proving it. lol.

only a true simpleton would take you at your word given how consistent losers you are.

 

[mark francis]

americans would be pretty slow to believe you idiots claims of fraud since you couldn't win a single court case proving it. lol.

only a true simpleton would take you at your word given how consistent losers you are.

We do not have to prove democrats fight voting securities and voter fraud investigations, making them totally helpless in disproving the massive amount of 2020 voting fraud evidence against them.

 

[pjmret]

We do not have to prove democrats fight voting securities and voter fraud investigations, making them totally helpless in disproving the massive amount of 2020 voting fraud evidence against them.

you do have to prove your claims of fraud, and you failed every time.
every single time. lol.

its hard to find a losing record as pathetic as yours, but you've succeeded!

 

[mark francis]

you do have to prove your claims of fraud, and you failed every time.
every single time. lol.

its hard to find a losing record as pathetic as yours, but you've succeeded!

The evidence will forever stand as a witness against 2020 democrat voting fraud for as long as democrats cannot refute it.

 

[pjmret]

The evidence will forever stand as a witness against 2020 democrat voting fraud for as long as democrats cannot refute it.

The evidence will forever be laughed at for losing every case

 

[Phoenix68]

The Court ruled against Democrat voting fraud law in Michigan​

Michigan Sec. of State's election restrictions struck down, adding to list of election issues | Just The News 10-23-23

.

.
"JUST THE NOISE!!!!!"
.​

 

[mark francis]

The evidence will forever be laughed at for losing every case

I doubt history will attach much significance to 60 voter fraud cases that were removed from courts before serious investigations into the 2020 voting fraud evidence had even begun.

 

[Boris Norris]

I doubt history will attach much significance to 60 voter fraud cases that were removed from courts before serious investigations into the 2020 voting fraud evidence had even begun.

They were the investigations. The prosecutor's produced no evidence and the decisions of the courts proved it.
Yet some old demented Godbotherers continually implies he has the damning evidence that could swing an election four years after it happened. Really.

Have another go. I love taking the Mickey out of you.

 

[mark francis]

They were the investigations. The prosecutor's produced no evidence and the decisions of the courts proved it.
Yet some old demented Godbotherers continually implies he has the damning evidence that could swing an election four years after it happened. Really.

Have another go. I love taking the Mickey out of you.

There wasn't enough time to compare INS records with voting records to identify how many, if any, illegal immigrants had voted, but we do know there were millions of ineligible voters' names on bloated registries the democrats had 'fought like hell' to keep on the books.

 

[pjmret]

There wasn't enough time to compare INS records with voting records to identify how many, if any, illegal immigrants had voted, but we do know there were millions of ineligible voters' names on bloated registries the democrats had 'fought like hell' to keep on the books.

so you know nothing about any actual fraud.

why haven't you idiots been working on names for the past 3 years? oh that's right, you've already admitted you are lazy and stupid lol

 

[mark francis]

so you know nothing about any actual fraud.

why haven't you idiots been working on names for the past 3 years? oh that's right, you've already admitted you are lazy and stupid lol

The reason election laws require the removable of names from voting rolls when those voters no longer remain eligible in precincts is to prevent ineligible voters from voting. Why do leftists resist registry purges and voter fraud investigations?

 

[pjmret]

The reason election laws require the removable of names from voting rolls when those voters no longer remain eligible in precincts is to prevent ineligible voters from voting. Why do leftists resist registry purges and voter fraud investigations?

why do you resist proving fraud occurred like you claim over and over?
oh because you have no proof. lol

 

[mark francis]

why do you resist proving fraud occurred like you claim over and over?
oh because you have no proof. lol

We must identify how many illegitimate voters on bloated voting rolls cast ballots that should not have been certified, but that would require quite an extensive investigation that has not been done. Until investigations uncover the facts nobody can prove Democrats did not commit massive voting fraud in 2020.

 

[Phoenix68]

I doubt history will attach much significance to 60 voter fraud cases that were removed from courts before serious investigations into the 2020 voting fraud evidence had even begun.

.

.​

"Nearly all the suits were dismissed or dropped due to lack of evidence or lack of standing, including 30 lawsuits that were dismissed by the judge after a hearing on the merits. Among the judges who dismissed the lawsuits were some appointed by Trump, himself. Judges, lawyers, and other observers described the suits as "frivolous" and "without merit". In one instance, the Trump campaign and other groups seeking his reelection collectively lost multiple cases in six states on a single day. Only one ruling was initially in Trump's favor: the timing within which first-time Pennsylvania voters must provide proper identification if they wanted to "cure" their ballots. This ruling affected very few votes, and it was later overturned by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court."

.

.​

 

[pjmret]

We must identify how many illegitimate voters on bloated voting rolls cast ballots that should not have been certified, but that would require quite an extensive investigation that has not been done. Until investigations uncover the facts nobody can prove Democrats did not commit massive voting fraud in 2020.

so its 4 years later and you lazy slugs haven't done anything? lol.
god you are beyond being lazy slugs. lol