The Court ruled against Democrat voting fraud law in Michigan

[mark francis]

Republicans are still fighting Democrats over leftist rules and laws designed to allow for massive election fraud. Thank God the Democrats lost this case in Michigan.

Michigan Sec. of State's election restrictions struck down, adding to list of election issues | Just The News 10-23-23

Michigan Sec. of State's election restrictions struck down, adding to list of election issues

The Secretary of State's office was previously ruled against by a court for its signature verification directive from 2020 and the state Auditor General found issues with voter roll maintenance.

Michigan Sec. of State's election restrictions struck down, adding to list of election issues
By Natalia Mittelstadt

Published: October 23, 2023 11:00pm

AMichigan appeals court ruled against the Secretary of State over election challenger restrictions, adding another court loss for the office, which has seen at least a few election issues in recent years.

 

[pjmret]

They ruled it was voting fraud? No?
God you enjoy looking like a mindless liar lol

 

[mark francis]

They ruled it was voting fraud? No?
God you enjoy looking like a mindless liar lol

No, the court ruled the democrat law designed to enable voting fraud was illegal because it violated election laws.

https://prod-static.gop.com/media/d...ting_Partial_Declartory_Relief_1718296410.pdf

 

[pjmret]

No, the court ruled the democrat law designed to enable voting fraud was illegal because it violated election laws.

https://prod-static.gop.com/media/d...ting_Partial_Declartory_Relief_1718296410.pdf

which isn't fraud, legal mron. lol.
and you have to prove it was designed to enable fraud...feel free to put that in writing and send it to them and accuse them and see how fast you get sued for slander

god you must enjoy lying.

 

[mark francis]

which isn't fraud, legal mron. lol.
and you have to prove it was designed to enable fraud...feel free to put that in writing and send it to them and accuse them and see how fast you get sued for slander

god you must enjoy lying.

There can be no doubt that democrats have openly opposed voting security measures for invalid reasons for decades. They insist Americans believe democrats committed no voting fraud while challenging voter fraud cases in courts in attempts to disallow the investigations. Democrats are not about election honesty and integrity nor are they interested in investigations to assure Americans that no signoificant fraud occurred.

 

[pjmret]

There can be no doubt that democrats have openly opposed voting security measures for invalid reasons for decades. They insist Americans believe democrats committed no voting fraud while challenging voter fraud cases in courts in attempts to disallow the investigations. Democrats are not about election honesty and integrity nor are they interested in investigations to assure Americans that no signoificant fraud occurred.

There can be no doubt you lied once again because this story does not show that anyone committed voting fraud you obviously are too stupid to understand what fraud is LOL

 

[Boris Norris]

Republicans are still fighting Democrats over leftist rules and laws designed to allow for massive election fraud. Thank God the Democrats lost this case in Michigan.

Thank god?? How was god involved? Did you thank god for the seats that democrats won? What a ridiculous claim.

Michigan Sec. of State's election restrictions struck down, adding to list of election issues | Just The News 10-23-23

Michigan Sec. of State's election restrictions struck down, adding to list of election issues

The Secretary of State's office was previously ruled against by a court for its signature verification directive from 2020 and the state Auditor General found issues with voter roll maintenance.

Michigan Sec. of State's election restrictions struck down, adding to list of election issues
By Natalia Mittelstadt

Published: October 23, 2023 11:00pm

AMichigan appeals court ruled against the Secretary of State over election challenger restrictions, adding another court loss for the office, which has seen at least a few election issues in recent years.

There is no laws introduced specifically to allow voter fraud. That is a blatant lie.

 

[mark francis]

Thank god?? How was god involved? Did you thank god for the seats that democrats won? What a ridiculous claim.


There is no laws introduced specifically to allow voter fraud. That is a blatant lie.

Democrats despise election securities like voter IDs, voting records cleansing, and citizenship verifications.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats despise election securities like voter IDs, voting records cleansing, and citizenship verifications.

That's a lie. The democrats have never not cleansed voter records.
Citizenship verifications are not the job of democrats.
You're desperate to find something to defile democracy.

 

[mark francis]

That's a lie. The democrats have never not cleansed voter records.

You are full of it on this one.

Exclusive: Judicial Watch Uncovers Dirty Voter Rolls, Fights for Election Integrity | Judicial Watch 1-12-22
INVESTIGATIVE BULLETIN|JANUARY 12, 2022

Exclusive: Judicial Watch Uncovers Dirty Voter Rolls, Fights for Election Integrity

In California, we uncovered 1.6 million inactive voters on electoral rolls in Los Angeles County and sued, forcing LA to clean up its act.

1.6 million ineligible voters on the voting rolls of just one county in the nation. That translates to many millions of ineligible names on voting rolls across America.

 

[Boris Norris]

You are full of it on this one.

Exclusive: Judicial Watch Uncovers Dirty Voter Rolls, Fights for Election Integrity | Judicial Watch 1-12-22
INVESTIGATIVE BULLETIN|JANUARY 12, 2022

Exclusive: Judicial Watch Uncovers Dirty Voter Rolls, Fights for Election Integrity

In California, we uncovered 1.6 million inactive voters on electoral rolls in Los Angeles County and sued, forcing LA to clean up its act.

1.6 million ineligible voters on the voting rolls of just one county in the nation. That translates to many millions of ineligible names on voting rolls across America.

Again, can you point to where democrats are specifically responsible for that?

Here's a little reference to your biased source. Not they only target democrats.

Judicial Watch (JW) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit[1] American conservative activist group[2] that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials. Founded in 1994, Judicial Watch has primarily targeted Democrats, in particular the administrations of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, as well as Hillary Clinton's role in them. It was founded by attorney Larry Klayman, and has been led by Tom Fitton since 2003.

 

[pjmret]

You are full of it on this one.

Exclusive: Judicial Watch Uncovers Dirty Voter Rolls, Fights for Election Integrity | Judicial Watch 1-12-22
INVESTIGATIVE BULLETIN|JANUARY 12, 2022

Exclusive: Judicial Watch Uncovers Dirty Voter Rolls, Fights for Election Integrity

In California, we uncovered 1.6 million inactive voters on electoral rolls in Los Angeles County and sued, forcing LA to clean up its act.

1.6 million ineligible voters on the voting rolls of just one county in the nation. That translates to many millions of ineligible names on voting rolls across America.

and zero evidence of actual fraud.

not that you know what the word "fraud" means, as shown by this thread. lol

 

[mark francis]

and zero evidence of actual fraud.

not that you know what the word "fraud" means, as shown by this thread. lol

Bloated voting rolls cast deep shadows of suspicion on honest elections. Election officials who resist keeping voting rolls up to date are derelict in their duties.

 

[pjmret]

Bloated voting rolls cast deep shadows of suspicion on honest elections. Election officials who resist keeping voting rolls up to date are derelict in their duties.

so no evidence of fraud.
and yet you idiots keep claiming it.
guess that's why you keep losing court cases and paying big defamation amounts. lol

 

[mark francis]

so no evidence of fraud.
and yet you idiots keep claiming it.
guess that's why you keep losing court cases and paying big defamation amounts. lol

Democrats "fight like hell" against every voting security measure while demanding people simply take them at their unverified word that they would never commitm fraud. Amewricans have to be pretty slow to think democrats oppose election securities because they would never commit voting fraud.