Something woke will never understand

[Gabriel_Bell]

Clearly trump is a pervert. A depraved pervert.

Entirely true. Plus, he is also a liar, a thief, and a cheat, both with taxes and wives.
Plus he shits himself.

A common sinful temptation among male sinners is to look at naked female forms. Democrats claim they don't have those temptations and they may be right if they are not normal.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

It is PERFECTLY NORMAL for male humans to want to look at unclothed female forms. It can't be called sinful unless the male is looking at the female who has not given him permission. Who is perverted? Mark.

 

[mark francis]

How about this: we both agree to limit ourselves to claims that are falsifiable, even if they are religous based. Deal?

I bet you have no idea what “falsifiable” means.

Let's agree to differ on the secularist limitations of the value and definition of the term "falsifiable."

 

[Randomguy]

Let's agree to differ on the secularist limitations of the value and definition of the term "falsifiable."

Why? What do you think falsifiable means? Maybe we agree on that.

 

[mark francis]

Clearly trump is a pervert. A depraved pervert.

That may or may not be true. Some claim Biden is a pervert, which may or may not be true.

 

[mark francis]

It is PERFECTLY NORMAL for male humans to want to look at unclothed female forms. It can't be called sinful unless the male is looking at the female who has not given him permission. Who is perverted? Mark.

Let's be more specific.

 

[mark francis]

Why? What do you think falsifiable means? Maybe we agree on that.

Let me simplify. If falsifiable has anything to do with scientific evidence derived by observation then it is stricularly non-religious since God and spiritual matters cannot be observed. You cannot use the term falsifiable to insure equality of debate freedoms by limiting discussions to matters only applicable to atheism.

 

[Randomguy]

Let me simplify. If falsifiable has anything to do with scientific evidence derived by observation then it is stricularly non-religious since God and spiritual matters cannot be observed. You cannot use the term falsifiable to insure equality of debate freedoms by limiting discussions to matters only applicable to atheism.

That was gobbledygook. You feel you are about to be checkmated and trying to change the game. Give us your definition. Maybe we agree.

 

[Randomguy]

That may or may not be true. Some claim Biden is a pervert, which may or may not be true.

You not denying that trump is a pervert and depraved is a big step forward.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Simple statements are either true or false.
I would say that "falsifiable" means a true statement than by taking advantage of the inability of the masses to think clearly, or the lack of definitive evidence, can convince the masses that the statement is false.

Such as the claim that Reagan, who took measures to make the wages of the middle class stagnant, acted admirably.
The claim that Trump makes when he says that tariffs will somehow end inflation is another one.

 

[mark francis]

You not denying that trump is a pervert and depraved is a big step forward.

Most politicians are unbelievers who do not please God. However, Christians tend to vote for politicians who will just show respect for God and Christians, even if those politicians are not saved themselves.

 

[mark francis]

Simple statements are either true or false.
I would say that "falsifiable" means a true statement than by taking advantage of the inability of the masses to think clearly, or the lack of definitive evidence, can convince the masses that the statement is false.

Such as the claim that Reagan, who took measures to make the wages of the middle class stagnant, acted admirably.
The claim that Trump makes when he says that tariffs will somehow end inflation is another one.

The term "falsifiable" cannot be used in matters of theological beliefs, either pro-God or anti-God.

 

[Randomguy]

The term "falsifiable" cannot be used in matters of theological beliefs, either pro-God or anti-God.

Why not? Because you said so? You claimed we would not agree on the definition. That was a bluff. I called your bluff but you have not been able to give your definition. I am convinced you have no idea what it means. Your only way out now would be if you copy and paste from a dictionary in which case your whole world here on this forum would crumble and will be shown as a fake reality and at best a fiction.

 

[Randomguy]

Most politicians are unbelievers who do not please God. However, Christians tend to vote for politicians who will just show respect for God and Christians, even if those politicians are not saved themselves.

Fake respect! How gullible do you think most Christians are? Then again you want them to believe trump.

Still kudos to you for not denying that trump is a pervert, albeit you claim he respects Christians.

 

[Randomguy]

The term "falsifiable" cannot be used in matters of theological beliefs, either pro-God or anti-God.

You are wrong. Here:

Claim: humans evolved from apes.

Is it your position that the above claim is not falsifiable?

(I am convinced you have no idea what falsifiable means.)