Falsifiability pertains to the limited range of what can be examined by human senses, which means that falsifiability has no power to rule on matters that are outside the bounds of human perception
Not “pertains to.” The definition! Here is one:
Secular science remains in the dark about supernatural matters. Science is incapable of commenting on spiritual matters and is therefore secular.
Run run run! Run away as fast you can.
Like you are
No debate of theoretical science has any value as long as one side assumes without evidence or proof that there is no God.
How? He said we would not agree on the definition. Then steadfastly refused to give his definition. I then gave mine and he did not say if he agrees or not.
You are correct. That which is claimed without evidence can be rejected without evidence. Have you not been paying attention to what I have steadfastly said? I have never seen proof that god does not exist. I have also not seen proofs that Santa clause or snowman or Loch Ness monster do not exist.)
Biblical claims are indeed immune from attempts at refutation based on human logic void of irrefutable scientific facts.
Not quite but mostly agree. Now when bible is contradictory to itself (like Judas betraying Jesus) that is some evidence that bible is not perfect and is the word of men.
Seeming contradictions in the Bible are the result of misinterpretations of Scripture, not Biblical errors.
There is NO EVIDENCE of any mass escape of Hebrew slaves from Egypt, for example. The Moses story is widely thought to be simply a myth. The Egyptians wrote everything down. But there is not a word about any ten plagues. Israeli archeologists sent years in the Sinai trying to find evidence of any large population there and say they found nothing.
Nonsense! There are dozens and dozens of irrefutable contradictions.
Why aren’t these corrected? To be honest, I don’t believe much of what you say based on your history on the forum.
What you MEAN is that YOUR beliefs are immune from logic to you.
