Something woke will never understand

Yes as in a simple question of having kids? When one cannot even acknowledge it . You sit and watch what people say or do the “correct” way in your eyes! Meaning just because one does not believe in your beliefs you degrade one. Yes others may as well but you cannot answer or acknowledge simple questions. So don’t go there with me. You call me mean maybe? But I just tell it like I see it but to degrade one because of what they believe, it’s their choice. Others treat people as one is lower just because I voted one way or another. Well anyone can look like an ass no matter who they voted for! Trump can sit home in his many places he owns. He did not have to run! Biden did! You will figure it out since you are highly intelligent you claim. Thanks.
Yer welcome.

Your “as in” did not make sense to me.

It is not in my eyes per se. I say one should not force their religious views on others in political forum. You disagree?

I have not degrade others for disagreeing with me. You got an example?

Trump is greedy. He is never satisfied. He famously does not pay his bills such as plumbers, landscapers, etc.

Trump DID have to run. He was humiliated by Obama and needed revenge.

I do not believe I have claimed to be highly intelligent. Got a quote on that?
 
Werbung:
You are reading more into what I said than wan intended. A lower iq is not a lower human being. My comment was factual and neutral. My comment was based on what I have observed here. Could I be wrong? Of course.

Speaking of disappointments, what about posters who impose their religious views on others in politics forum? How about repeatedly quoting a post but not responding to it and ignore the request to cease and desist? Do those behavior disappoint you?
Sharing an opinion is not forcing that opinion on posters who are on the forum to force their contrary opinions on others.
 
Staring at naked girls was Trump's fave thing about owning his beauty pageant, and he said so.
A common sinful temptation among male sinners is to look at naked female forms. Democrats claim they don't have those temptations and they may be right if they are not normal.
 
Sharing an opinion is not forcing that opinion on posters who are on the forum to force their contrary opinions on others.
Sharing is not debating. Debating is not just sharing. If I told you I have two kids, I am sharing with you. If I say if have two kids and since you do not you are a jerk unworthy of say teaching our children, now I am debating, arguing. You constantly use your religion to engage in arguments on a political forum. Calling that “sharing” is disingenuous.
 
A common sinful temptation among male sinners is to look at naked female forms. Democrats claim they don't have those temptations and they may be right if they are not normal.
See, that is not just sharing. That is passing judgment on others based on your and their religious views. I think it is rude and it is imposing your religious views on others.
 
Yer welcome.

Your “as in” did not make sense to me.

It is not in my eyes per se. I say one should not force their religious views on others in political forum. You disagree?

I have not degrade others for disagreeing with me. You got an example?

Trump is greedy. He is never satisfied. He famously does not pay his bills such as plumbers, landscapers, etc.

Trump DID have to run. He was humiliated by Obama and needed revenge.

I do not believe I have claimed to be highly intelligent. Got a quote on that?
Nope!
 
Sharing is not debating. Debating is not just sharing. If I told you I have two kids, I am sharing with you. If I say if have two kids and since you do not you are a jerk unworthy of say teaching our children, now I am debating, arguing. You constantly use your religion to engage in arguments on a political forum. Calling that “sharing” is disingenuous.
Calling a rehearsal of Christian views unjust violations of a person's rights while calling promotion of atheist and hedonist views totally acceptable is extremely biased and unjust.
 
See, that is not just sharing. That is passing judgment on others based on your and their religious views. I think it is rude and it is imposing your religious views on others.
Will you ever stop judging and slandering Christians and conservatives or are you incapable of tolerance?
 
Will you ever stop judging and slandering Christians and conservatives or are you incapable of tolerance?
You know what I think, to the both of you… a person reaching out for help that is hurt, no matter the race, religion, gender, blue or red party, you would help them! I guess a silly example but I feel y’all would! Just saying!
 
Will you ever stop judging and slandering Christians and conservatives or are you incapable of tolerance?
I will not pass any judgement about your religious views if you stop bringing them up as arguments here. But I am sure you cannot keep your mouth shut about your religious views,
 
Calling a rehearsal of Christian views unjust violations of a person's rights while calling promotion of atheist and hedonist views totally acceptable is extremely biased and unjust.
Here is an example for you, not that I have any hope you will understand it, the same way you never understood falsifiability. your views on terminating pregnancies are religious. My views on the same subject are not atheistic.

Now you will never address this argument but a few weeks will pass and you will again compare my reason-based views to your religious-based views. you are a total waste of time and effort when it comes to reasoned discussions.
 
I will not pass any judgement about your religious views if you stop bringing them up as arguments here. But I am sure you cannot keep your mouth shut about your religious views,
Are you wanting me to purge my posts of any references to things related to Christianity as you purge your posts of everything that promotes things related to atheism or ungodliness?
 
Werbung:
Are you wanting me to purge my posts of any references to things related to Christianity as you purge your posts of everything that promotes things related to atheism or ungodliness?
How about this: we both agree to limit ourselves to claims that are falsifiable, even if they are religous based. Deal?

I bet you have no idea what “falsifiable” means.
 
Back
Top