you are simply a *****. i posted several examples of judges looking at evidence. that's what judges do, legal *****.That is simply not true. Few if any judges allowed anyone to present evidence of voting fraud in court, where legitimate judgments would have been rendered after cases are heard, not illegitimately rendered on the backs of luncheon napkins without a trial.
feel free to prove that cases were illegitimately rendered on teh backs of napkins, *****. duh.
and these kinds of cases dont go to trial..well not to jury trials, its a bench trial where the judge makes a decision, and that's exactly what happened.
my god you truly dont care how stupid you look. lol