Some religions must be false.

Werbung:
courts don't work when judges won't hear the case. How did democrats control that? by putting in their own supporters willing to do anything to promote and protect the democ party.
what? lol. god you post the dumbest things.
republicans have been appointing judges like crazy.

for example: As of June 30, 2022, of the 9 justices of the Supreme Court, 6 were appointed by a Republican president, and 3 were appointed by a Democratic president. As of March 19, 2024, of the 179 Courts of Appeals judges, 91 were appointed by Republican presidents, compared to 86 by Democratic presidents.

you must really enjoy looking stupid. lol
 
Mark, shake the dust from your feet Nor throw those pearls. Just sayin'.

Don't wrestle with pigs...you both get dirty and the pig likes it.
Man has free will...let it go.
 
Mark, shake the dust from your feet Nor throw those pearls. Just sayin'.

Don't wrestle with pigs...you both get dirty and the pig likes it.
Man has free will...let it go.
lol, it makes you feel good to pretend to be better than others
at least i'm not stupid enough to claim the election is stolen without credible proof, unlike you morons
 
judges looked at the evidence you morons had and ruled it not credible.
that is a fact. lol.
That is simply not true. Few if any judges allowed anyone to present evidence of voting fraud in court, where legitimate judgments would have been rendered after cases are heard, not illegitimately rendered on the backs of luncheon napkins without a trial.
 
what? lol. god you post the dumbest things.
republicans have been appointing judges like crazy.

for example: As of June 30, 2022, of the 9 justices of the Supreme Court, 6 were appointed by a Republican president, and 3 were appointed by a Democratic president. As of March 19, 2024, of the 179 Courts of Appeals judges, 91 were appointed by Republican presidents, compared to 86 by Democratic presidents.

you must really enjoy looking stupid. lol
Those who make a big deal about who appointed what judges seem to think the appointed judges will act as stooges for their nominating politicians. That cannot always be the case since biased judges who rule by opinion rather than by law must consider peer pressures, working environment pressures, pressures from friends, family, and associates, pressures from news outlets, and so forth, regardless of single-issue political party leanings.
 
yeah, look at republicans desperately trying to argue the election was stolen lol
We look at republicans and see rational arguments for investigating voting fraud. We look at democrats and see lies and obstructions designed to hide past voting fraud and protect avenues of future voting fraud.

Office of Public Affairs | Former Philadelphia Judge of Elections Convicted of Conspiring to Violate Civil Rights and Bribery | United States Department of Justice

Former Philadelphia Judge of Elections Convicted of Conspiring to Violate Civil Rights and Bribery

Thursday, May 21, 2020

For Immediate Release

Office of Public Affairs

A former Judge of Elections has been convicted for his role in accepting bribes to cast fraudulent ballots and certifying false voting results during the 2014, 2015, and 2016 primary elections in Philadelphia.

Domenick J. Demuro, 73, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty during a sealed proceeding on March 16, 2020, before U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond to conspiring to deprive persons of civil rights, and using interstate facilities in aid of bribery. The court unsealed the matter today. Sentencing is scheduled for June 30, 2020.

During his guilty plea hearing, Demuro admitted that while serving as an elected municipal Judge of Elections, he accepted bribes in the form of money and other things of value in exchange for adding ballots to increase the vote totals for certain candidates on the voting machines in his jurisdiction and for certifying tallies of all the ballots, including the fraudulent ballots. Demuro further admitted that a local political consultant gave him directions and paid him money to add votes for candidates supported by the consultant, including candidates for judicial office whose campaigns actually hired the consultant, and other candidates for various federal, state and local elective offices preferred by that consultant for a variety of reasons. Demuro also admitted that the votes he added in exchange for payments by the political consultant increased the number of votes fraudulently recorded and tallied for the consultant’s clients and preferred candidates, thereby diluting the ballots cast by actual voters.
 
lol, it makes you feel good to pretend to be better than others
at least i'm not stupid enough to claim the election is stolen without credible proof, unlike you morons
Stupidity is blindly accepting the unverified word of God-deniers, looters, rioters, perverts, gangsters, and thugs who claim they participated in no significant voting fraud in 2020.
 
Werbung:
Stupidity is blindly accepting the unverified word of God-deniers, looters, rioters, perverts, gangsters, and thugs who claim they participated in no significant voting fraud in 2020.
It's far more reliable than taking the word of a hypocritical godbothering republican.
 
Back
Top