Pandora
Well-Known Member
Sorry Abomination but I don't have time to talk to stupid people. Take a number.
ahhh you must have looked at a map
Dang I feel bad for my friend who moved to canada, I do hope they have private schools there
Sorry Abomination but I don't have time to talk to stupid people. Take a number.
Again, why are people preferring the production of steam from radiation to run turbines instead of pre-existing steam from geothermal wells? There is no logic. Nuclear plants are MORE EXPENSIVE to build, maintain; their sister industries, mining of uranium, transportation and waste storage of radioactive toxic waste are vastly expensive. They are TERRORIST TARGEST. Imagine the destruction if the twin towers were instead nuclear reactors? Hmmm?
So which is it that you folks prefer in nuclear over geothermal? Is it the fact that it's more expensive? More dangerous? More toxic? Bigger terrorist worry? Which of these things that sets nuclear apart from geothermal, both of which use the same steam-driven turbine technology, is it that you are hopelessly in love with?
Is it that it is trickier to produce steam with radiation, so the prices can be manipulated with less explanations??
You tell us.
How much energy does the US use per year?
How much could be produced through geothermal per year?
You tell us.
How much energy does the US use per year?
How much could be produced through geothermal per year?
Sihouette can't do a comparison becasue she has no idea how much geothermal it would take to produce a megawatt. She thinks megawatt is a term used for Meg's grandfather who is hard of hearing.
Whhhaaaattttt you say Meg?
Source: http://www.nmcco.com/education/facts/general/general_home.htm
We have 103 licensed nuclear plants, mainly in the eastern half of the US.
2957.94 MW of geothermal power are in current use. Alaska, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah are the only states with geothermal plants. And of those, California ranks highest in MW output. Many of the plants though are small and not taking advantage of the existing potential. All of just these states are grossly underexploited for geothermal resources.
Source: http://www.geo-energy.org/publications/reports/Geothermal_Update_August_7_2008_FINAL.pdf
The comparison between the two is indeed laughable. Now lets look at the geothermal potential map, the POTENTIAL geothermal map of the western half of the US.
Yes, the whole point is that we need more geothermal plants, as many as nuclear, to make an accurate comparison. So let's get busy and bring the number of geothermal plants up to 103 nationwide and we'll do an accurate side-by-side comparison.
And of course it won't be a simple comparison, we will have to take into account the total actual costs of both types of power generation, including mining, if any, transportation, if any, safety, management, development and waste disposal, if any vs output and benefit to US citizens..
Then we can all make intelligent decisions. Since geothermal is so benign, we should already be at work bringing the number of plants up to at least 103 at full potential for the study proposed..
You do want it to be a fair comparison eh?
I thought that Sil.. was very courteous in her last post, which is more than I can say for you.
You just don't like the truth in my name. Get together with libs and try again to have it censored.
Thanks mr. who. I like to know I'm being listened to.
I do not think people are listening to you, but laughing at you...
But perhaps you are you trying for that canadian humor? If you are, I think you should study it a bit better.....
I thought that Sil.. was very courteous in her last post, which is more than I can say for you.
Could be but I haven't said anything as funny as your beaver dam story that backed up the river for 40 miles. Are you a dirty little murican liar?
Medication is delicate, you have to take it at the right time. Your mental health is nothing to mess around with.