steveox
Well-Known Member
Steve has woman problems....don't blame the poor guy....
Yeah you bet i have girl problems. Its all because of Womens lib!
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
Remember Elian Gonzalez that Bill Clinton sent him back to commie cuba ?
- Thread starter steveox
- Start date
Yeah you bet i have girl problems. Its all because of Womens lib!
Werbung:
vyo476
Well-Known Member
I'd be inclined to think it's more because you think it's all because of women's lib.
steveox
Well-Known Member
Let me put it this way.Dealing with girls and getting dates was so much easier and simple back in the 1950s and beyond. Nowadays its much tougher getting dates because its the girls make it more complicated.
vyo476
Well-Known Member
Because now, unlike the 1950s, it's more acceptable for them to say "no" if they don't like you - or to give you the runaround until they decide whether they like you or not.
Face it! If you want to get a date, it'll have to be based on more than just what you want now.
steveox
Well-Known Member
Thats why i always thought it was better to live back in the soviet union days.Cause russians used to be a very politie society under communist rule.Il even bet you Russian girls were allowed to behave in a certain way.In fact if every girl told me "no" Id tell her hey you better go out with me or ill report yer ass to the KGB. And you know what those guys will do to ya? See i dont have to walk up to a KGB agent and say ""well she wont go out with me"" Ill i have to say is ,,Sir that girl over there called Mr Brezhnev an asshole,, And theyre grab that girl and haul her ass to jail.
USMC the Almighty
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2007
- Messages
- 2,070
Steve, I consider myself to be conservative and have no problem attracting women. I'm not going to make fun of you or call you stupid, I would just really like to know how old you are. My guess would be that its your age which impacts your view of women more than anything else.
steveox
Well-Known Member
Jack did any girl behave back in the 1950s like they do now? You walk up to one they never play hard to get. They never made things so differcult like guessing games.If you ever watch "Leave it to beaver" show not one Girl rejects wally. NOT ONE. Wally is the one who says if he wants to go out with her or not. Eddie Haskell always con Wally to go out on a date but Wally says to Eddie"" Well i dont know"" Thats how guys behave back in the 1950s. Theyre the ones who make the calls. But Girls wanted guys back in 1950s. Theyre the ones who fought over guys back in those days. But nowadays its the guys who want girls and its the girls who say if you get them or not.Girls are the ones make the call not guys.
steveox
Well-Known Member
But Puerto Rico isnt an US state. You still have to go though US customs when you enter in the US from Puerto Rico dont you?
This is a FANTASY in your head.
Sure, girls probably were in general a bit more submissive due to the way society was at that time. But it wasn't like you think it was.
It wasn't like a bloke could walk up to any girl in the street and have her like that. This is just pathetic nostalgia for a time you blatantly have never lived in.
I'm sure every man would like it to be the case that he always calls the shots, but in the end its better that it doesnt happen like that. Its all that equal rights stuff, annoying isn't it steve? Always putting an attractive young man like yourself down...
Do you really believe "Leave it to Beaver" to be a factual documentary on life in the 1950's?
steveox
Well-Known Member
Well look at the society back then,,For example Kids arent disaplined like they were in the 1950s. Todays Parents just go out work longer or get booze like Welfare mothers do and dont care what their kids do. Todays kids would take drugs and bring weapons to school to kill their classmates. Kids back in the 1950s wouldnt do anything like that. Kids were taught to dress nice and use decent manners around adults. Todays kids dress like rats with earrings and wear caps sideways or backwards and dont use any manners around people. I have never heard any kid reply to you as Yes Sir, No Sir or Yes Maam or No Maam. Beaver & Wally always say Yes Sir ,No Sir or Yes Maam or No Maam around adults. Nowadays they say Yeah or Nope.Todays kids watch Violence and filth on TV than they did back in the 1950s. Plus they didnt listen to music that groups sing about volence or sex. And there were no MTV on any station back in 1950s. The only music they watched was american Bandstand and that was it. So Girls were easy and much nicer to get than the Rats today.
Disagree all you want, you're still wrong.
Sometimes, but that's a matter of refugee policy, not immigration policy. People escaping murderous dictatorships can be shunted into refugee camps and then asked to leave when conditions in their home country improve. We are not obligated even in the slightest way to incorporate them into this nation under conditions of full citizenship, which is what you're suggesting.
You keep repeating this; you seem to forget Cubans vote Republican anyway (the only Latino constituency that does). They wouldn't have voted for Gore, anyway.
If George Bush cared about his party, he'd take the hardest stance against immigration possible -- i.e., the position that's popular among the vast majority of Americans. But he doesn't, nor does he care about his country. Nor do most liberals.
Again, this is circuitous logic. The Latino vote is only growing as fast as it is because of immigration. Cut immigration and the Latino vote's rate of growth will plummet along with its political relevance.
What you're advancing is silly, anyway. Latinos do not and have never voted on the basis of immigration politics. Pete Wilson won in California despite being the most anti-immigrant politician in the country (and it's pathetic that he's the best we could do, because he's still to the left of the national majority). They vote for the party that gives them the most indulgent deal, which will almost always be the Democratic Party, the party that keeps their drug dealers out of jail and lets their 14-year-old children get government-subsidized abortions on demand.
And even if it were true, it'd still be ethically abhorrent: you're advancing a political position solely on the basis of its political advantage, rather than its empirical worthiness. If immigration were bad for the country (and make no mistake, it absolutely is), you'd still support it on the basis that the party can eke out some advantage from it. That's just sick.
And Steve, women do not play hard to get. If it seems like they're avoiding you, they actually are avoiding you. No girl seriously ever says to herself, "Gee, I like him and I think he likes me, so I'm going to go out of my way to make myself unavailable to him." If she likes you, you'll be able to tell. If you can't tell, she doesn't like you.
Werbung:
vyo476
Well-Known Member
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you steveox, the man who thinks he needs a murderous, totalitarian police state backing him up to get a date.
Have you ever tried getting to know a girl? Sitting down and actually having a discussion? Really paying attention to what she has to say? You'd probably have a lot more luck if you'd start looking at women as equals, rather than going off about how you wish the Soviet Union would murder any girls who won't go out with you just because you happened to like them.
Similar threads
