I am looking at the literal meaning of a passage as an extremist might look at it. I'm not saying that's just a parable so it doesn't count type of crap.
Well, first of all your not using the literal interpretation. You said
"In Luke 19:22-27, Jesus orders killed anyone who refuses to be ruled by him."
When quite clearly we can see what it says is
27"But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them—bring them here and kill them in front of me."
that Jesus name doesnt even appear in the verse. It is the "king" who is giving the orders, not Jesus. "Jesus" is not a literal interpretation of the word "king".
And if extremist did make such a misrepresentation of the doctrine, as you have, to incite violence, I really couldnt blame the doctrine when it is their misrepresentation of the doctrine that is doing the incitement.
Unfortunately, the fundamentalist are interpreting "fight", "kill", "slay" and "smite the necks" of the unbelievers to mean "fight", "kill", "slay" and "smite the necks" of the unbelievers, so I blame the doctrine.