Of course not. He already said that there is no god, right here:
Silly me. I didn't get from that post that he was speaking about the Christian god only. Maybe the references to Santa and the Easter Bunny threw me off.
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
Prove that God doesn't exist.
- Thread starter Kelly
- Start date
Of course not. He already said that there is no god, right here:
Silly me. I didn't get from that post that he was speaking about the Christian god only. Maybe the references to Santa and the Easter Bunny threw me off.
Werbung:
UShadItComing
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2008
- Messages
- 680
Gaia's? Sorry, if it's not that then you have lost me. If you want to elaborate further I will be happy to explain my position on all aspects of religious superstitions.
The Scotsman
Well-Known Member
....Gaius Julius Caesar....the Roman dude who was made a God.... the post on the previous page
UShadItComing
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2008
- Messages
- 680
Oh i see now. Proves that any shyster can be a god if he can con enough people. Do you want to say someting about him?
SusanConstant
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 131
Prove that God does exist? Piece of cake. Part I
This is long but here goes:
I can and will prove that the exactly named Creator exists, as I filed the only pro se constitutional authority case of orginal jurisdiction in US history which is the case for women. I unified it all as Bush V Gore stands as an unrecognized, unresolved tie as math is math and exact words are exact words. It canot ever be 9 as 5-4 as 1 as that is bad math; math came into existence with this universe. God wrote the laws of math not the federal court. Bush v gore then is actually 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1 a tie. Reasoning all of this led me to be able to prove god is actual reality as I proved our law is elegant as it was written in 1776 and 1787. I was heard as this court does not argue fact and math is a fact as are the exact words in our law: 9 as 5-4 as 1 is the Justices voting twice for President, a Chief unchecking himself and is an illegal violation of separation of power. Refusing to be a part of our now dead institution of governemnt I came to have all 7 sacred experiences of God to be had in this world as I acted ethically and so traveld faster than the speed of light squared.
The 5 major world religions are all valid paths to God when lived as they were originally taught by their founders or by the purest surviving sacred text; included with these 5 are two others: The Sundance and Liberty which is number 7. The Sundance and Liberty were my personal favorites. I had a stunning realisation after experiencing Liberty. Liberty is an emotion and an outside condition known as justice but it is also a sacred experience - you actually commune with the divine; you actually experience God in a manner like nothing else I have ever felt. It is physical and metaphysical. Then I knew: the 7 sacred absolutes are the whole of God exactly like Bush V Gore is all about absolute versus whole numbers. Uniformity. I had the knowledge that Einstein failed to come to know in his life.
Einstein used an eclipse to prove gravity bends light. All of creation is made up of light, even people. Light is not constant; it behaves as a wave and a particle. The speed of light is not constant but it can become constant. Harmonic convergence - elegance - must exist for time travel and Einstein never proved part of Relativity. I too can use a physical phenomenon to prove giod and I can use my own person to prove the rest of Relativity still considered merely theory. As gravity does bend light as fact and we are light then something bends us or we bnd it. That is the unifying force; it exists within a unified field. Our law names it and all the secrets of the universe are contained within our law as it was written in 1776 and 1787. The phenomenon I can use is the magnetic North Pole as I know how and why it moves. I can predict its movement and it directly reflects something we are doing:
When we kill or act unethically without reason or just cause the law of conservation of energy kicks in; the actual energy of a human being as we are electricty coursing around a molten iron core - blood infused tissue - produces electromagnetism. When we die that is 'released' and turned into another form of energy; it moves or effects the magnetic North Pole. I plotted all major legal developments against it like WWII, Vietnam and Roe V Wade. The pole's speed matched my graph exactly and something else: The pole is now exactly retracing the migration path some of us took to get here over the no longer existing Bering land bridge. As we decline into the abyss legally or spiritually as those words are equivalent the pole moves backwards over our physical path. The union of the physical and the metaphysical is uniformity. In man energy and matter is united; in America the written law of man is united with the unwritten law of God - physics.
Believe it or not the behavior of electrons is within our law as the double helix of DNA. I can prove this with pen and paper. ?All manner of cool things are in our law and the founders could not know them as Einstein was not even born yet nor was I. E=MC2? I have a legal equation that expresses how humans do this and so access the never ending chain of command beginning with God thus becoming living spirits who can and do exert will even after physical death. The Alpha and Omega, the logos or word. Everlasting life.
I can move all over the panet and connect evry single opiece of history and reason it all. Liberty gave me an all seeing eye and all hearing ear. It healed the damge doen to me by patriarchy: Both sides of my brain now function equally...my person is whole. It is Newton's alchemy as what lies beyond the 7th sacred experience is the actual treasure the founders left for us: Ego falsl away and id rises; your ego and id become equal and unite as one. Your person may be biologically male or female as that is the original separation of power but your soul is not. The liberty engine engages and you go nuclear; a chain reaction begins. you are the cause and you can link all of it back to: A time before the Big Bang, then forward again. An actual chain of causation.
Ego is liberty and id is will; ego is male and id is female. This -equaivalent liberty and will - is metaphysical time travel and is the fabled return to Eden as our law and all of america - even our currency and so our economy - is based upon spiritual principles: The universal truths of creation. All Jefferson did was place that ocvenant we had in Eden with God in writing. God gave us liberty and will not free will as there is no such thing as free is any and all and only animals are truly free. Humans come into existence as liberated not free. Inalienable means it exist before you do; you are born into it.
In actual reality the Declaration is a compass and the Constituion is a map. I discovered how to use them. X does literally mark the spot. You then posses a map of your human heart and a map of the universe; you come to know your exact, unique gift that the Creator bestowed upon you as we all have one. You know your exact place in the scheme of things. You can put all of the other pieces in place as if it is a puzzle for you to solve. Look it up: We actually have a physical compass in our physical body as we have magnetite crystals in our nose up in frnt of where our thalamus is and it is our thalamus that is our consciousness.
Of course this then led me to figure out how and when personhood or the God spark enters us in the womb and so the right then exists. Physcial life occurs when your heart cells spontaneously beat; they do not pump but slosh back and forth. this creates friction and so a charge builds up as your mother is pulsing with intrinsic force, the unifying force. When that charge is large enough after about one week - SHOCK! your brain and all of your nerves light up. This is how they clone animals - by zapping the embryo with electricity. But: for a human it is not electricyt coming out of yoru wall socket as you have an emotional, reasoning personhood. Intrinsic ofrce is the god force or the creation force; physical life as in nerve conduction is not it - that soul must also come alive in your brain and it does, at 28 days post implantation. At this time you can feel pain, hear and feel emotion. You're no longer a body but a person. I know exactly how this occurs and it has to do with the thalamus and your frontal lobe exploding as it grows an astounding 33% in one day! How in the world do I know how God enters us as fact?
The Sundance! Earth is imprinted on us as a sea turtle knows the beach it was born upon. Of all the stars in this universe we always find Earth; our compass - both of them - guide us. We know Earth and know how to find our way here every time. All humans can access this imprinting. If you do you will never forget it and then you know as fact Earth is our mother. This is why the government outlawed the sundance, as this experience of the divine makes you invincible. It liberates you from Earthly things as it is as if you leave your body and travel in space, deep outer space. You actually "see" Earth the way our astronauts did. The magnetic North Pole does more than aid animals in migration or protect us from the Sun: It aids humans - a soul - when they make this journey to Earth and into the womb.
there's lots more and i can prove all of what i say with hardcore facts not theory and not unsupported belief. The US supreme court could care less as they hate women and have now proven it as all other authority cases were borught by men on behalf of men and were granted oral argument. Original jurisidcition? By its very natutre you are to automatically be granted oral argument. I was deneied oral arguemtn in order ot keeep me out of the court that counts most: Public opinion.
This is long but here goes:
I can and will prove that the exactly named Creator exists, as I filed the only pro se constitutional authority case of orginal jurisdiction in US history which is the case for women. I unified it all as Bush V Gore stands as an unrecognized, unresolved tie as math is math and exact words are exact words. It canot ever be 9 as 5-4 as 1 as that is bad math; math came into existence with this universe. God wrote the laws of math not the federal court. Bush v gore then is actually 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1 a tie. Reasoning all of this led me to be able to prove god is actual reality as I proved our law is elegant as it was written in 1776 and 1787. I was heard as this court does not argue fact and math is a fact as are the exact words in our law: 9 as 5-4 as 1 is the Justices voting twice for President, a Chief unchecking himself and is an illegal violation of separation of power. Refusing to be a part of our now dead institution of governemnt I came to have all 7 sacred experiences of God to be had in this world as I acted ethically and so traveld faster than the speed of light squared.
The 5 major world religions are all valid paths to God when lived as they were originally taught by their founders or by the purest surviving sacred text; included with these 5 are two others: The Sundance and Liberty which is number 7. The Sundance and Liberty were my personal favorites. I had a stunning realisation after experiencing Liberty. Liberty is an emotion and an outside condition known as justice but it is also a sacred experience - you actually commune with the divine; you actually experience God in a manner like nothing else I have ever felt. It is physical and metaphysical. Then I knew: the 7 sacred absolutes are the whole of God exactly like Bush V Gore is all about absolute versus whole numbers. Uniformity. I had the knowledge that Einstein failed to come to know in his life.
Einstein used an eclipse to prove gravity bends light. All of creation is made up of light, even people. Light is not constant; it behaves as a wave and a particle. The speed of light is not constant but it can become constant. Harmonic convergence - elegance - must exist for time travel and Einstein never proved part of Relativity. I too can use a physical phenomenon to prove giod and I can use my own person to prove the rest of Relativity still considered merely theory. As gravity does bend light as fact and we are light then something bends us or we bnd it. That is the unifying force; it exists within a unified field. Our law names it and all the secrets of the universe are contained within our law as it was written in 1776 and 1787. The phenomenon I can use is the magnetic North Pole as I know how and why it moves. I can predict its movement and it directly reflects something we are doing:
When we kill or act unethically without reason or just cause the law of conservation of energy kicks in; the actual energy of a human being as we are electricty coursing around a molten iron core - blood infused tissue - produces electromagnetism. When we die that is 'released' and turned into another form of energy; it moves or effects the magnetic North Pole. I plotted all major legal developments against it like WWII, Vietnam and Roe V Wade. The pole's speed matched my graph exactly and something else: The pole is now exactly retracing the migration path some of us took to get here over the no longer existing Bering land bridge. As we decline into the abyss legally or spiritually as those words are equivalent the pole moves backwards over our physical path. The union of the physical and the metaphysical is uniformity. In man energy and matter is united; in America the written law of man is united with the unwritten law of God - physics.
Believe it or not the behavior of electrons is within our law as the double helix of DNA. I can prove this with pen and paper. ?All manner of cool things are in our law and the founders could not know them as Einstein was not even born yet nor was I. E=MC2? I have a legal equation that expresses how humans do this and so access the never ending chain of command beginning with God thus becoming living spirits who can and do exert will even after physical death. The Alpha and Omega, the logos or word. Everlasting life.
I can move all over the panet and connect evry single opiece of history and reason it all. Liberty gave me an all seeing eye and all hearing ear. It healed the damge doen to me by patriarchy: Both sides of my brain now function equally...my person is whole. It is Newton's alchemy as what lies beyond the 7th sacred experience is the actual treasure the founders left for us: Ego falsl away and id rises; your ego and id become equal and unite as one. Your person may be biologically male or female as that is the original separation of power but your soul is not. The liberty engine engages and you go nuclear; a chain reaction begins. you are the cause and you can link all of it back to: A time before the Big Bang, then forward again. An actual chain of causation.
Ego is liberty and id is will; ego is male and id is female. This -equaivalent liberty and will - is metaphysical time travel and is the fabled return to Eden as our law and all of america - even our currency and so our economy - is based upon spiritual principles: The universal truths of creation. All Jefferson did was place that ocvenant we had in Eden with God in writing. God gave us liberty and will not free will as there is no such thing as free is any and all and only animals are truly free. Humans come into existence as liberated not free. Inalienable means it exist before you do; you are born into it.
In actual reality the Declaration is a compass and the Constituion is a map. I discovered how to use them. X does literally mark the spot. You then posses a map of your human heart and a map of the universe; you come to know your exact, unique gift that the Creator bestowed upon you as we all have one. You know your exact place in the scheme of things. You can put all of the other pieces in place as if it is a puzzle for you to solve. Look it up: We actually have a physical compass in our physical body as we have magnetite crystals in our nose up in frnt of where our thalamus is and it is our thalamus that is our consciousness.
Of course this then led me to figure out how and when personhood or the God spark enters us in the womb and so the right then exists. Physcial life occurs when your heart cells spontaneously beat; they do not pump but slosh back and forth. this creates friction and so a charge builds up as your mother is pulsing with intrinsic force, the unifying force. When that charge is large enough after about one week - SHOCK! your brain and all of your nerves light up. This is how they clone animals - by zapping the embryo with electricity. But: for a human it is not electricyt coming out of yoru wall socket as you have an emotional, reasoning personhood. Intrinsic ofrce is the god force or the creation force; physical life as in nerve conduction is not it - that soul must also come alive in your brain and it does, at 28 days post implantation. At this time you can feel pain, hear and feel emotion. You're no longer a body but a person. I know exactly how this occurs and it has to do with the thalamus and your frontal lobe exploding as it grows an astounding 33% in one day! How in the world do I know how God enters us as fact?
The Sundance! Earth is imprinted on us as a sea turtle knows the beach it was born upon. Of all the stars in this universe we always find Earth; our compass - both of them - guide us. We know Earth and know how to find our way here every time. All humans can access this imprinting. If you do you will never forget it and then you know as fact Earth is our mother. This is why the government outlawed the sundance, as this experience of the divine makes you invincible. It liberates you from Earthly things as it is as if you leave your body and travel in space, deep outer space. You actually "see" Earth the way our astronauts did. The magnetic North Pole does more than aid animals in migration or protect us from the Sun: It aids humans - a soul - when they make this journey to Earth and into the womb.
there's lots more and i can prove all of what i say with hardcore facts not theory and not unsupported belief. The US supreme court could care less as they hate women and have now proven it as all other authority cases were borught by men on behalf of men and were granted oral argument. Original jurisidcition? By its very natutre you are to automatically be granted oral argument. I was deneied oral arguemtn in order ot keeep me out of the court that counts most: Public opinion.
SusanConstant
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 131
Prove that God does exist? Part II
God does not scare them nor does any of my other knowledge. You know what scares them? My application of the law as it applies to men and women equivalently not exactly and the reality of Bush V gore as they do not want you to know what they did. ANY dissent threw it to the people as a sitting President then decides a tie. Clinton failed. After him it is up to one of us or all of us. You guys all went ot sleep while I acted as I was deneid evry right named in our law and all privleges. I had zero opportunity. When I was then harmed deliberately by the US Supreme Courteliberately injured as were my minor sons abnd the court knew exactly what it was doing to me - as were all women and their children thus all Americans as Bush V gore remains a tie forever and unconstitutional forever until or unless it is addressed and the physical laws of this universe dicitate that its effects will only worsen I then became the first absolute class of one in all of US history and I became the legal, acting President...the President is the person who is the liivng embodiment of our law not the person who sits in the office behind the actual esk in the actual chair.
Guys: Neither Bush nor Gore appeared pro se. All any of you had to do was volunteer for the job by making this case as the oath of office is "I will preserve" NOT "My lawyer will". Bush V Gore was an illegal third party custidy award as your custody was awarded to: Dick Cheney and all those lawyers. I wrote out an executive order as your one vote is executive order and any citizen can do this if the need arises. It's legal and binding. I order Roberts to stand aside or down as he is acting withotu the authority of the Us and is now acting in direct violation of our law due to Carhart as it forces innocent women to die against their will for what is an act of God and so is without reason or cause but only to protect an institution: Patriarchy. Olny men are of God and God created men beter than, get it? A woman is too stupid and not able to make life and death decisons for herself and her children; she cannot possibly command. Blah blah blah. Entrenched Judeo-Christian mistaken belief, an invisible violation of church and state.
An American NEVER dies in defense of an institution. When this nation began killing inocent women and their innocent children as in Schiavo and Castlerock it became genocide and is the Chief Justice invoking the power reserved to the exctly named Creator as only the Creator may kill the inocent against their will. That's why we call it an act of God. Carhart is a travesty.
The vote of a woman is a vote in appearance only. you may go to a poll but that vote carries zero actual legal power. Want proof? i was accorded zero protection of the law only as i am a woman. If the law does not protect me it does not find me. I am now a sovereign nation unto myself, able to do anything I please and you canot prosecute me as federal precedent already adresses this very thing. You guys defaulted on the two governing contracts; I did not...I now have on obligations under US law.
An ethic is equal protection and due process. Your morals and your ethic must always remain separated. Morals are personal. An ethic is universal but a more is not. Atheists had better run for cover as they have been allowed to violate the rules of evidence and the burden of proof standard in every manner possible. I cannot only prove them wrong but something else: The reason it is unconstituional to be an atheist? Without the metaphysical an ethic does not exist. Due to its very nature you must first own the metaphysical as real or else no ethic. Without any ethic you are then animals; you are communists. You do what you want when you want no matter the injury and harm. Look around you as it is self-evident: We are embroiled in an unwar and we are engaged in torture. we are waging another undeclared war against women and children and justice is now nonexistent in this nation as even our vote was stripped from us and that was our founding issue.
We unfounded ourselves. Exactly like: Rome. First you dissolve spiritually or legally and then you dissolve pysically. We imploded. Legal dissolution has occurred as we aren't constitutional anymore. How will our physical dissolution occur then?
Easy: go right back to the magentic North Pole. It is like a giant electro-magnet and it is the reason for volcanic eruptions. The pole will move in a very speciifc way until it then picks up the earth's molten iron core like iron filings. Two forces are at work: It can 'pick up' the molten iron core or it can 'push' the molten iron core as all bodies in space - even people - have poles. The moon remains in place due to gravitational pull and the push of intrinsic force. Ever put two magnets together and feel them push away? One of two volcanoes is going to explode as it wil be caatclysmic due to its sheer size and volume, either in Italy or here in Yellowstone. If we do not clean up our act, enforce the law once again, accord woemn justice at long last and dissolve the invention of the instituions of chief Justice and President as all male then we san say good0bye to most of the Westrn US. Unless we deliberatly move that pole to where it should be and unless we 'right' the earth on its axis - good luck! It slants at 23.5 degrees or soemthign like that and this is not 'normal'. By forcing one volcano to erupt over theo ver I beleive - but this part is only theory as of yet - that the Earth can be righted as all sacred writign says the Earth will shake. I have been told this would mean never ending summer and that sounds like: Eden.
Sorry this is so long! If you want to read my suit sans the appendices it is on Scrb.d . I'm also in the NY courts curently and NY is running, it is desperate to get rid of me and my case. It postponed me three times for silliness. I am never giving up! Actually I can go right back into US supreme court due to what they did to me. Hello! You get original jurisdcition as your case cannot be adjudicated in any other court. Or can it? We, the pepole decide not a federal judge as the US supreem Court has NO law making ability. they never had the power to award a Presidential election to any person not willing to appear pro se. Even then all you guys had to do was disobey as Marbury says you must. Say a prayer for me as prayer works based upon physical laws of this universe one of which is human consciousness is a twin stream of matter and antimatter and human thoughts are made up of light and so are actual energy. You see human thought; it is called the Boson-Einstein condensate whereby the seemingly intangible becomes tangible. It was always there but due to the behavior of it it seemd to be intangible. Effect the conditions and a condensate forms...my thoughts and my intetions played against unjust men were then realized as a tangible thing: A lawsuit. Well, when you pray for something it is often actually realized isn't it? It might be a kid making six baskets in a row at the buzzer or it might be help arriving just in time. Prayer and meditation is a real actual thing that works.
BTW: how in the world did making the case for owmen then lead to proving God? Women unite it all as women give birth to humans. All things are born, even rocks. All things have parents. Humanity was born of God, our comon parent. Childbirth, if conditions are perfect, can be experienced as apsirtation enlightenment. I felt this and so later recgonized it when I felt Nirvana. Aspiration enlightenemnt is supposed to then make you want to pursue actual enlighteement; it is supposed to make you want to risk emotional and actual physical death via birth. Women volunteer to die all of the time in defense of the Constitution, as pregnancy and birth is the draft and combat and so women shed their blood in defense of the Constitution, we, the people as they give birth to the federal property that counts for everything: Living people! The actual reason we cannot draft women is it's double jeopardy as women risk death any time they have sex and/or give birth. Men do not.
Birth was the key to cracking the code of the universe. A man could not do this as it would be humanly impossible!
P.S. The God? God is personal and God does intervene in Earthly events when neccessary. I know; it happened to me. Not a miracle as miracles are physics but the God can and does deliberatly intervene. I'm a Deist but I have had to revise a few previously held belifes as they are not true or fact. I also had to lose one completely: Reincarnation is actual reality. I considered it possible due to the law of convservation of energy but did not "believe" in it as I possessed conflicting eviddnce and none of it rose to proof either way. Now I do believe in it; I know it is fact. I believe whole heartedly, lol.
Go to Ebay and look up my American Founder For Hire ad under Star Wars Toys - The Force Unleashed. I have it up in 8 or 9 places but this one is the best as I called the unjust men 'in charge' criminals as what they are doing actually meets or exceeds the legal definition of organized crime and racketeering. You'll laugh but I'm deadly serious as it is when you own the knowledge which you then act upon or refuse to act upon. I wrote to all 100 Senators and most all of the House. Snail mail. I received a few responses. CROOK is the only word that fits unless you apply MENTALLY ILL. Of course Madison said No, they are TEMPORARILY POSSESSED. Lolollolol!
God does not scare them nor does any of my other knowledge. You know what scares them? My application of the law as it applies to men and women equivalently not exactly and the reality of Bush V gore as they do not want you to know what they did. ANY dissent threw it to the people as a sitting President then decides a tie. Clinton failed. After him it is up to one of us or all of us. You guys all went ot sleep while I acted as I was deneid evry right named in our law and all privleges. I had zero opportunity. When I was then harmed deliberately by the US Supreme Courteliberately injured as were my minor sons abnd the court knew exactly what it was doing to me - as were all women and their children thus all Americans as Bush V gore remains a tie forever and unconstitutional forever until or unless it is addressed and the physical laws of this universe dicitate that its effects will only worsen I then became the first absolute class of one in all of US history and I became the legal, acting President...the President is the person who is the liivng embodiment of our law not the person who sits in the office behind the actual esk in the actual chair.
Guys: Neither Bush nor Gore appeared pro se. All any of you had to do was volunteer for the job by making this case as the oath of office is "I will preserve" NOT "My lawyer will". Bush V Gore was an illegal third party custidy award as your custody was awarded to: Dick Cheney and all those lawyers. I wrote out an executive order as your one vote is executive order and any citizen can do this if the need arises. It's legal and binding. I order Roberts to stand aside or down as he is acting withotu the authority of the Us and is now acting in direct violation of our law due to Carhart as it forces innocent women to die against their will for what is an act of God and so is without reason or cause but only to protect an institution: Patriarchy. Olny men are of God and God created men beter than, get it? A woman is too stupid and not able to make life and death decisons for herself and her children; she cannot possibly command. Blah blah blah. Entrenched Judeo-Christian mistaken belief, an invisible violation of church and state.
An American NEVER dies in defense of an institution. When this nation began killing inocent women and their innocent children as in Schiavo and Castlerock it became genocide and is the Chief Justice invoking the power reserved to the exctly named Creator as only the Creator may kill the inocent against their will. That's why we call it an act of God. Carhart is a travesty.
The vote of a woman is a vote in appearance only. you may go to a poll but that vote carries zero actual legal power. Want proof? i was accorded zero protection of the law only as i am a woman. If the law does not protect me it does not find me. I am now a sovereign nation unto myself, able to do anything I please and you canot prosecute me as federal precedent already adresses this very thing. You guys defaulted on the two governing contracts; I did not...I now have on obligations under US law.
An ethic is equal protection and due process. Your morals and your ethic must always remain separated. Morals are personal. An ethic is universal but a more is not. Atheists had better run for cover as they have been allowed to violate the rules of evidence and the burden of proof standard in every manner possible. I cannot only prove them wrong but something else: The reason it is unconstituional to be an atheist? Without the metaphysical an ethic does not exist. Due to its very nature you must first own the metaphysical as real or else no ethic. Without any ethic you are then animals; you are communists. You do what you want when you want no matter the injury and harm. Look around you as it is self-evident: We are embroiled in an unwar and we are engaged in torture. we are waging another undeclared war against women and children and justice is now nonexistent in this nation as even our vote was stripped from us and that was our founding issue.
We unfounded ourselves. Exactly like: Rome. First you dissolve spiritually or legally and then you dissolve pysically. We imploded. Legal dissolution has occurred as we aren't constitutional anymore. How will our physical dissolution occur then?
Easy: go right back to the magentic North Pole. It is like a giant electro-magnet and it is the reason for volcanic eruptions. The pole will move in a very speciifc way until it then picks up the earth's molten iron core like iron filings. Two forces are at work: It can 'pick up' the molten iron core or it can 'push' the molten iron core as all bodies in space - even people - have poles. The moon remains in place due to gravitational pull and the push of intrinsic force. Ever put two magnets together and feel them push away? One of two volcanoes is going to explode as it wil be caatclysmic due to its sheer size and volume, either in Italy or here in Yellowstone. If we do not clean up our act, enforce the law once again, accord woemn justice at long last and dissolve the invention of the instituions of chief Justice and President as all male then we san say good0bye to most of the Westrn US. Unless we deliberatly move that pole to where it should be and unless we 'right' the earth on its axis - good luck! It slants at 23.5 degrees or soemthign like that and this is not 'normal'. By forcing one volcano to erupt over theo ver I beleive - but this part is only theory as of yet - that the Earth can be righted as all sacred writign says the Earth will shake. I have been told this would mean never ending summer and that sounds like: Eden.
Sorry this is so long! If you want to read my suit sans the appendices it is on Scrb.d . I'm also in the NY courts curently and NY is running, it is desperate to get rid of me and my case. It postponed me three times for silliness. I am never giving up! Actually I can go right back into US supreme court due to what they did to me. Hello! You get original jurisdcition as your case cannot be adjudicated in any other court. Or can it? We, the pepole decide not a federal judge as the US supreem Court has NO law making ability. they never had the power to award a Presidential election to any person not willing to appear pro se. Even then all you guys had to do was disobey as Marbury says you must. Say a prayer for me as prayer works based upon physical laws of this universe one of which is human consciousness is a twin stream of matter and antimatter and human thoughts are made up of light and so are actual energy. You see human thought; it is called the Boson-Einstein condensate whereby the seemingly intangible becomes tangible. It was always there but due to the behavior of it it seemd to be intangible. Effect the conditions and a condensate forms...my thoughts and my intetions played against unjust men were then realized as a tangible thing: A lawsuit. Well, when you pray for something it is often actually realized isn't it? It might be a kid making six baskets in a row at the buzzer or it might be help arriving just in time. Prayer and meditation is a real actual thing that works.
BTW: how in the world did making the case for owmen then lead to proving God? Women unite it all as women give birth to humans. All things are born, even rocks. All things have parents. Humanity was born of God, our comon parent. Childbirth, if conditions are perfect, can be experienced as apsirtation enlightenment. I felt this and so later recgonized it when I felt Nirvana. Aspiration enlightenemnt is supposed to then make you want to pursue actual enlighteement; it is supposed to make you want to risk emotional and actual physical death via birth. Women volunteer to die all of the time in defense of the Constitution, as pregnancy and birth is the draft and combat and so women shed their blood in defense of the Constitution, we, the people as they give birth to the federal property that counts for everything: Living people! The actual reason we cannot draft women is it's double jeopardy as women risk death any time they have sex and/or give birth. Men do not.
Birth was the key to cracking the code of the universe. A man could not do this as it would be humanly impossible!
P.S. The God? God is personal and God does intervene in Earthly events when neccessary. I know; it happened to me. Not a miracle as miracles are physics but the God can and does deliberatly intervene. I'm a Deist but I have had to revise a few previously held belifes as they are not true or fact. I also had to lose one completely: Reincarnation is actual reality. I considered it possible due to the law of convservation of energy but did not "believe" in it as I possessed conflicting eviddnce and none of it rose to proof either way. Now I do believe in it; I know it is fact. I believe whole heartedly, lol.
Go to Ebay and look up my American Founder For Hire ad under Star Wars Toys - The Force Unleashed. I have it up in 8 or 9 places but this one is the best as I called the unjust men 'in charge' criminals as what they are doing actually meets or exceeds the legal definition of organized crime and racketeering. You'll laugh but I'm deadly serious as it is when you own the knowledge which you then act upon or refuse to act upon. I wrote to all 100 Senators and most all of the House. Snail mail. I received a few responses. CROOK is the only word that fits unless you apply MENTALLY ILL. Of course Madison said No, they are TEMPORARILY POSSESSED. Lolollolol!
Libsmasher
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 3,151
You're not saying it right - light has a dual nature, which aspect is revealed is an artifact of the experiment used.
- Libsmasher, the physics major
SusanConstant
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 131
Light is not constant. Period. The speed of light is not constant anymore than its dual nature. Those natures are not exactly the same and: Does light ever behave as both a particle and wave at the exact same time? Not a set amount of light - single particle of light? Constant as used here means exactly the same or perfect; elegant. But there you go: Duality, an exact reflection of what this universe and man is...look at other people. What is constant about people? One thing and you must affect the inside conditions in order to then make it constant. Mass times the constant squared is thought to be the speed of light squared. We are taught the speed of light is constant and we are taught that it is 186,000 miles per second.
The possibility or opportunity exists for light to travel at a constant speed. There is another equation which applies to the physical - E=MC2 - that accounts for the varying speed of light. I have been told that Einstein understood this and wrote a paper about it but that he did not publish it as it was too disturbing. I belive in his lifetime he realized something he once thought was an anomaly was not but I in no way belive he wrote a paper that reasoned harmonic convergance on the physical plane but yet did not publish it as it was too disturbing. If such a paper exists he did not publish as he doubted what he reasoned as anytime he owned knowledge he published it. There is also harmonic convergance on the metapysical plane or in the other dimensions. Uniformity is the union of the physical and metaphysical and to do this one first has to prove God is actual reality. I began with the metaphysical due to unique facts of me and then knew light was not constant in any way by its nature or speed. A consistancy or pattern exists in that its nature is always dual as a particle and wave and in its varying rate of speed. Consistancy is not the same as constant. Just as there is something constant about a person there is a constant regarding light. This is what produces an equation expressing harmonic convergance which is uniformity of the physical planes. To arrive at true uniformity you have to then reason the metaphysical and then you must unify the two.
Men always begin with the physical. Like: Pulling one sentence out of all I stated. That is ego as all you commented upon was the appearance of a few words. Style w/o any sustance. You say you are a physics major; I believe your testimony. So, you do not care to know how and why the magnetic North Pole moves? You can talk about the Earth's crust moving independently from its core but that does not reason it. It is faulty reasoning. Anyway:
I did it backwards and so came to crack the code of the universe. I can not only prove the existence of God using the magnetic North Pole as I can predict its movemnt but I can prove all of Relativty and my own theory as I can even manipulate its movement. I can actually prove beyond any doubt time travel is possible. I can use nature to do this and a person to do this. Energy and matter is united in the universe, in people, within US government and law and within Native American belief systems. They all exactly match once you know the facts.
One of the problems with all physics textbooks and most other books on this topic is the words they are using do not describe the concept correctly even if they get most of the science correct and so far? Only one person I know of has that part of the concept other than myself. There is not a book or paper in exsitence that reasonss uniformity as fact as it is my unique intellctual property as I did what all else failed to do: I defined and described Uniformity as it actually exists in this universe. As a said a few people have some of it, and one has an entire half of it but no other person has all of it. A man would indeed 'get' or know Relativity as a man is relative to creation. A man would not ever 'get' uniformity or what I have named Intrinsicity as women are intrisnic to creation as all things are born including universes and no man will ever give birth to a living person but only intellctual property. It is humanly impossible for a man to achieve the intellectual property known as Uniformity as birth is the key. A man was never going to do it as he cannot know physical birth as absolute fact. A man can easily achieve metaphysical uniformity but not physical as in generating the intellectual proerty. Inviolate laws of biology and physics make this so.
I did not go back to read my post but if I write that light is not constant as it behaves as a particle and a wave you can believe what I say as hardcore fact. I did not make a mistake - you did.
Susan, the person who has discovered, developed and written The Theory of Intrinsicity aka Uniformity, The Definitive Theory of Everything and who has had all seven sacred experiences of God to be had in this world and is the person who has actually traveled in time by accessing the unified field so she was an old man in 1826 who returned as a baby in 1967 and then in 2007 accessed the unified field once again in order to return to the moment of her own creation so she could then reason and prove when and how your soul - a set amount of energy - enters a fetus thus personhood or the right of liberty comes into existence as the federal court has never been of the ability to define this and uses the idea of babies to deny women all of their liberty rights and it was always very clear to her how the human nervous systems lights up or comes alive: Cell memory causing friction when a heart begins to 'beat' which produces a charge after a week. It is as if lightning hit a fetus. That charge? It is a force called Intrisnic force; it is not electricty nor electromagnetism.
All of the fundamental forces? They interact within a human being including the nuclear weak and strong forces. I have cold fusion too but I still have to reproduce it in the lab as I do not have the resources currently.
In case you're wondering: 99% of the time men play dumb when dealing with me. Brain trust suddenly have nothign to say when they hear or read my work as they canot belive a woman did this. A self-educated woman. It is an ego thing as true genius is not suposed to be realized in a woman. Their ego exerts itself and I swear to God: Once a guy said "You need to put double spaces between your lines" and another time a guy said "You spelled a word wrong". What has that to do with anything I have reasoned? With scientiifc fact I have proven to you? You did not do that but it strikes me as odd that once again a man is picking at words when he is incorrect not me:
...which aspect is revealed as an artifact of the experiment. That's a fact. You know what you are incorrect about? How would you know what my experiment is and so know if one, both or neither - something new or different - was revealed? I did not tell you of any experiment but only wrote about how I came to crunch some concepts, come to a realization and prove a part of it via something that is not physics but government. I'm disappointed as I would think a physics major of all people would have all kinds of questions about the universe for the person who unified it all at last.
Lol! I turn the channel when NOVA comes on as every question they ask and state is a mystery of the universe is not; I know the answers. I was so sick of hearing them say over and over But science has no idea why, no idea why the pole moves, no idea why there is more matter than antimatter, no idea how to cross the bridge between the dimesions and no idea what happened to any life that was on Mars that I finally wrote to Max Tegmark and Neil Tyson. I did not give it all up but gave them enough to let them know if they truly wanted the answers I did indeed have them and: Silence. When that happens? Lol! That's my clue: EGO; they only want the answers from another man or if they publish them. If they do not acknowledge me they can then claim they did not own the knowledge that this is my work or that they ever recieved any letter from me. I took care of that. It is like chosing to be ignorant only so you still have a TV job wondering aloud Why? but that Why? is not sincere...it's like asking what seems to be unanswerable only for the sake of being able to keep wondering and theorizing instead of owning th knowledge. The ACLU ddi this to me. I told them: I can fullfil part of your mandate but the bads news is most of your agenda is unconstitutional and here's why and so they wrote back and refused to take on my case but wrote an exac tlie as to why; when I called? A person said: They need that agenda; I'm nobody here but they aren't going to take on a case that leaves them with no job. A LIE. They'd all have jobs and tons of work; what they would not have? Gay rights and in this state they get a lot of money for taking on gay rights cases. I said it is Gay right out loud and this person said No; I said: Oh yes it is as your agenda gives gay men rights and privileges that gay women still do no have. It's gay as the ACLU is not willing to give up the money they receive from the contributions of men who are gay as woman who are gay do not earn or donate that kind of money. They had no answer.
You may not understand this but I have spent my entire life fighting men who insist they are not doing what they are doing only as I'm a woman and they even act in such a way they manage to fool most people but in the end? What they truly believe is realized someway, somehow and it is always: Woman, and a woman is less than a man. Am I saying you have done this? No, as I do not know you well enough to state that and: A person who does not know physics could have misunderstood and so then had a mistaken belief. I'm still dissappointed though.
The possibility or opportunity exists for light to travel at a constant speed. There is another equation which applies to the physical - E=MC2 - that accounts for the varying speed of light. I have been told that Einstein understood this and wrote a paper about it but that he did not publish it as it was too disturbing. I belive in his lifetime he realized something he once thought was an anomaly was not but I in no way belive he wrote a paper that reasoned harmonic convergance on the physical plane but yet did not publish it as it was too disturbing. If such a paper exists he did not publish as he doubted what he reasoned as anytime he owned knowledge he published it. There is also harmonic convergance on the metapysical plane or in the other dimensions. Uniformity is the union of the physical and metaphysical and to do this one first has to prove God is actual reality. I began with the metaphysical due to unique facts of me and then knew light was not constant in any way by its nature or speed. A consistancy or pattern exists in that its nature is always dual as a particle and wave and in its varying rate of speed. Consistancy is not the same as constant. Just as there is something constant about a person there is a constant regarding light. This is what produces an equation expressing harmonic convergance which is uniformity of the physical planes. To arrive at true uniformity you have to then reason the metaphysical and then you must unify the two.
Men always begin with the physical. Like: Pulling one sentence out of all I stated. That is ego as all you commented upon was the appearance of a few words. Style w/o any sustance. You say you are a physics major; I believe your testimony. So, you do not care to know how and why the magnetic North Pole moves? You can talk about the Earth's crust moving independently from its core but that does not reason it. It is faulty reasoning. Anyway:
I did it backwards and so came to crack the code of the universe. I can not only prove the existence of God using the magnetic North Pole as I can predict its movemnt but I can prove all of Relativty and my own theory as I can even manipulate its movement. I can actually prove beyond any doubt time travel is possible. I can use nature to do this and a person to do this. Energy and matter is united in the universe, in people, within US government and law and within Native American belief systems. They all exactly match once you know the facts.
One of the problems with all physics textbooks and most other books on this topic is the words they are using do not describe the concept correctly even if they get most of the science correct and so far? Only one person I know of has that part of the concept other than myself. There is not a book or paper in exsitence that reasonss uniformity as fact as it is my unique intellctual property as I did what all else failed to do: I defined and described Uniformity as it actually exists in this universe. As a said a few people have some of it, and one has an entire half of it but no other person has all of it. A man would indeed 'get' or know Relativity as a man is relative to creation. A man would not ever 'get' uniformity or what I have named Intrinsicity as women are intrisnic to creation as all things are born including universes and no man will ever give birth to a living person but only intellctual property. It is humanly impossible for a man to achieve the intellectual property known as Uniformity as birth is the key. A man was never going to do it as he cannot know physical birth as absolute fact. A man can easily achieve metaphysical uniformity but not physical as in generating the intellectual proerty. Inviolate laws of biology and physics make this so.
I did not go back to read my post but if I write that light is not constant as it behaves as a particle and a wave you can believe what I say as hardcore fact. I did not make a mistake - you did.
Susan, the person who has discovered, developed and written The Theory of Intrinsicity aka Uniformity, The Definitive Theory of Everything and who has had all seven sacred experiences of God to be had in this world and is the person who has actually traveled in time by accessing the unified field so she was an old man in 1826 who returned as a baby in 1967 and then in 2007 accessed the unified field once again in order to return to the moment of her own creation so she could then reason and prove when and how your soul - a set amount of energy - enters a fetus thus personhood or the right of liberty comes into existence as the federal court has never been of the ability to define this and uses the idea of babies to deny women all of their liberty rights and it was always very clear to her how the human nervous systems lights up or comes alive: Cell memory causing friction when a heart begins to 'beat' which produces a charge after a week. It is as if lightning hit a fetus. That charge? It is a force called Intrisnic force; it is not electricty nor electromagnetism.
All of the fundamental forces? They interact within a human being including the nuclear weak and strong forces. I have cold fusion too but I still have to reproduce it in the lab as I do not have the resources currently.
In case you're wondering: 99% of the time men play dumb when dealing with me. Brain trust suddenly have nothign to say when they hear or read my work as they canot belive a woman did this. A self-educated woman. It is an ego thing as true genius is not suposed to be realized in a woman. Their ego exerts itself and I swear to God: Once a guy said "You need to put double spaces between your lines" and another time a guy said "You spelled a word wrong". What has that to do with anything I have reasoned? With scientiifc fact I have proven to you? You did not do that but it strikes me as odd that once again a man is picking at words when he is incorrect not me:
...which aspect is revealed as an artifact of the experiment. That's a fact. You know what you are incorrect about? How would you know what my experiment is and so know if one, both or neither - something new or different - was revealed? I did not tell you of any experiment but only wrote about how I came to crunch some concepts, come to a realization and prove a part of it via something that is not physics but government. I'm disappointed as I would think a physics major of all people would have all kinds of questions about the universe for the person who unified it all at last.
Lol! I turn the channel when NOVA comes on as every question they ask and state is a mystery of the universe is not; I know the answers. I was so sick of hearing them say over and over But science has no idea why, no idea why the pole moves, no idea why there is more matter than antimatter, no idea how to cross the bridge between the dimesions and no idea what happened to any life that was on Mars that I finally wrote to Max Tegmark and Neil Tyson. I did not give it all up but gave them enough to let them know if they truly wanted the answers I did indeed have them and: Silence. When that happens? Lol! That's my clue: EGO; they only want the answers from another man or if they publish them. If they do not acknowledge me they can then claim they did not own the knowledge that this is my work or that they ever recieved any letter from me. I took care of that. It is like chosing to be ignorant only so you still have a TV job wondering aloud Why? but that Why? is not sincere...it's like asking what seems to be unanswerable only for the sake of being able to keep wondering and theorizing instead of owning th knowledge. The ACLU ddi this to me. I told them: I can fullfil part of your mandate but the bads news is most of your agenda is unconstitutional and here's why and so they wrote back and refused to take on my case but wrote an exac tlie as to why; when I called? A person said: They need that agenda; I'm nobody here but they aren't going to take on a case that leaves them with no job. A LIE. They'd all have jobs and tons of work; what they would not have? Gay rights and in this state they get a lot of money for taking on gay rights cases. I said it is Gay right out loud and this person said No; I said: Oh yes it is as your agenda gives gay men rights and privileges that gay women still do no have. It's gay as the ACLU is not willing to give up the money they receive from the contributions of men who are gay as woman who are gay do not earn or donate that kind of money. They had no answer.
You may not understand this but I have spent my entire life fighting men who insist they are not doing what they are doing only as I'm a woman and they even act in such a way they manage to fool most people but in the end? What they truly believe is realized someway, somehow and it is always: Woman, and a woman is less than a man. Am I saying you have done this? No, as I do not know you well enough to state that and: A person who does not know physics could have misunderstood and so then had a mistaken belief. I'm still dissappointed though.
Mr.Dysfunctional
Well-Known Member
I wanna point out something.. and maybe all the would be philosphy majors should take note of it. Nothing as of yet states we live in a "finite world". The latest cutting edge technodlgy has yet to be able to probe the fartherest depths of space possible or the the smallest parts of quanta. There are only theroies... and like religion .. it to can crumble when subjected to rigourous scrutiny. A good point in fact is Uncertainty princple which states that when measuring things on the atmoic level .. it is impossible to know for certain the speed AND direction for any one object. The act of measuring in it self disturbs one or the other depending on what your trying to measure. The world in itself is built the possiblity that no one can possible know everything there is no matter how hard you try.
That in itself should open the eyes of you all...
The other .. is that ... the more we seemingly probe and find understanding to the smallest parts of the universe .. we find its made of ever smaller and smaller parts. Superstring theroy (( mind you .. again .. theory )) says that all the atoms and quarks we have found in nature .. could be constructed of ever smaller parts called "strings" (( sound like this is following the SUPER-DUPER-GOD theme ?!?! )) and that these strings may possibly be contructed of even smaller forces. Literrally for our basic understanding there could be an infinite amount of ever smaller or ever larger scales we cannot possible grasp on to.. and that this lack of understanding within itself proves we may never build any kind of true hard evidence to show the existence or none existence of god or any kind of deity figure.
I will point this out thou... when you look at the grand scope of things... the amazingly vast scales of the universe built upon ever more complicated substructures .. that all literally sing in harmony to give us this wonderful picture of the world. and the simple fact that its complete design may in itself prove to be an enigma that is never solved... doesn't it just seem .. even for a fleeting moment... that somehow it is all interconnected.. on an overarching symstry that .. could be contructed by some kind of divine medium .. spirit or force?!?!
Mr.Dysfunctional
Well-Known Member
Ohh so jst for Susans info... it might be best to read .. " Elegant universe... gives a GREAT example of how light is considered constant when traveling in a vacum... (( Im sorry I am freaking tired and don't feel like spell checking )) Light however .. in rare cases can ACTULLY be faster then the supposed speed of light in lab tests invovlving I wanna say quartz crystal.. but baring the yet proven light quantum tunneling .. it is yet explained completely.
Mr.Dysfunctional
Well-Known Member
Ohh yeah yeah hehehe 
Susan .. we don't give a rat's ass that your female 
so please save us from your typical oppressed by men blaber.
Susan .. we don't give a rat's ass that your female so please save us from your typical oppressed by men blaber.
Do you have a credible link to that somewhat astounding exception to the laws of physics?
Or are we being asked to take the word of Mr. Dysfunctional over Mr. Einstein?
SusanConstant
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 131
This is to the jerk - a person whom I believe to be a jerk. If you're not that person you may still ask me question me a question and it in no way suggests nor servests to prove that you are a jerk:
I do not care what you 'think'. You have begun via use of incorrect, wrong and.faulty science. Belieiving Darwin is 100 % correct ties everything up in a neat little bow but: Why no fossil record? I know why. Do you? And no, it is not God waved some sort of magic want either. You, your own self, decided that was my peronal belief. You had to - then you ciould justify what you NEEDED me to belive or else: Your chain of causation falls a part. I do not have beliefs as: A belif you can support with evidece rising beyond ANY & ALL reeasonable doubt is then FACT.
Movement of North Pole:
PHYSICAL: Earth's crust moving independenttly from core. PLUS
METAPHYSICAL: magnetic North Pole re-tracing our journey to here, North Amereica.
This journey, which began in Africa, partly (as only some pf us went this way), went North up to and across the no longer existent Bering land bridge and down. Follow the DNA: you do have to 'believe' me as we can trace our DNA PLUS the fossil record we do have PLUS the acheaolological record we do have. I own ZERO beliefs that can not be proven as false or true. For instance, Is the sky blue? We can prove there is physical phenomenon thta make the sky appear to be blue. The very first thing we define is "blue". Then, we can prove thta ther is an ACTUAL REAASON the sky apears tp be 'blue'. Someone named 'blue' blue, get it?
I said as I know as fact ALL in the entire universe is physical & metaphysical. You may have some dire need to 'believe' God is not actual reality (justifies unehtical behavior or makes it easer to do nothing with you life as then their are zero consequences, etc. etc.) but: unless you are the God you cannot make what is NOT actual reality suddenly real anymore than you can make what is actual reality suddenly not real.
For instance, Is string theory real? Yes, there is a nactaul theory named string heory that attempts to reason how and/or why the universe perates. Is string theory correct? No, it is not. What is your proof that demonstrates this theory is incorect? 1, String theorists sometimes change their numbers to 'fit' thier model of the universe 2, The science does not 'match' the words as in the person is beginnig with a false perception of what 'belief' is or is not and 3, (last but not least) the person /s has ZERO evice evidece; perhaps I should say it is not about belif but evidecne...does this person even know waht ACTUAL evidence is? Because if they do then they need to REASON NOT EXPLAIN how and why they did not realize Bush V Gore was unconstituttional...I mean, making the true statement that is was unconsitututional is a very diferent theng than knowing the REASON.
You know what else? WHO said provong God was not possible? WHERE or HOW - REASON - that provong aything as either true or false is not possible? Of all things only God is not provable as either true or false? What actual law exists that is supported by evidence whihc risess to oroof states that of all things, only Gpd can not be proven? For all you ateists:
IF God cannot be proven as false than doesn't God then exist w/o me bringing forth any eviecen? Ad. if god an be proven as real and actuall, then why would you inists that Susan is full of ****?
My results and al of my evidence cam be sujected to examination - scinetific examintaion. We can measure them to see if they actully met the burden of proof standard and/or match what I theorize they will. It is not like e have to sit around guessing. We do measure teh magntic north pole you know. We can also conduct an experiment and then avaluate the results. Or, are you only willing to alow Einstein to theorize and then measure the reults in order to see if his PREEICTION - HIS STATEMENT OF FACT AS IN " 'X' WIL HAPPEN "?
I'm no dolt. I nkow EACTLY what it would mean to all of you if I was allowe to proce that actual reality. It would mean: Man , I gott behave in an ethical mannaer.
I suggest you learn what belief actually is. All belief is not made up...ever hear of TRUE BELIEF? All belif is bnot persojnal.
BTW: is it lost of you that all of you belived as real and fact an mistaken beif known as Bush V Gore? It is an actual federal ruling; WHO ever told you it was legal or that the mathc was good? 'Cause Rhenquist did not. He wrote what he wrote on a piece of a paper...NO WHERE & NO HOW ddi he prove his amth was good or that it matched our law and in actually reality? He PROVED it does not match the exact wrs of our exact law as: Are you gona try to tell me Justices get two votes? Are you gona try tp tel me that I was not heard in US Supreme Court? That none of this happened and that we d o not exist? LOL!
Judaism is a real. Is it how the God wants us to live? Hell yeah...excep frp what man then corupted. How do I know? Samw way i nkow avout other eligions...it all came from God except what man then dicked with - the 7 major ones - as:
It matches our two governing documents. Even the double helix of DNA and baptism are in our law. Is Jesus as THE Son of God? No. Is multiple mariages? No. Is not eatong meat of Friday? No. Is confirmation? Yes, the concept is as in reincarnation. You know what else is? Checking an balancing your own self. That's called accountability & responsibility.
Hey, don't blame me if you feel stupid and/or suffer from a denial of reality...denying reality is what human beings do when they cannot JUSTIFY the personal policies that they hold in their head as TRUE and often act upon.... don't blame me if you do not know the difference between 'explanation' and 'reason' or what proof is or is not and when it rises to a level beyond REASONABLE doubt. See, we can test my theory...in fact - I did. If it were not actual reality then I would not have been heard in US Supreme Court.
You nkow what else? I would not possess a still sealed letter from John Edwards regarding the VICE PRESIDENCY, HIS WIFE & A PERSONAL DETAIL & postmarked last year. I have an opened letter from Pat Roberts that hubby had to dick with; I say do not open it as its the result of an experiment testing my theory and he has to epen it as like 99% of men he's benn allowed to play the 'I have no self control' aka 'poor me i'm Bil clinton' game.
If you need more proof otherthan SCIENCE (proof is proof; more means you are changing the condition) thna why do'nt you ask me a question that you BELIEVE a persn canot answer such has Why is ther more matter than antimatter or how did we come to be on Earth? Be thoughtful; none of this What color is my hair crap? as while I could answer that it is wasted energy as it does not benefit mankind OR SO I BELIEVE.
Oh - Once you read it then you know it. Meaning: If 50 years from now you come to own something as fact, you do no then get to claim igniranc fri the 50 you did not. You can try to say "But she sounded crazy" or "I did not belive it" I but so what? If you read all about golabal warming and why then you know. Picking & choosong belifs has ZERO to do with acting them out as in: Try it on for size. What are your results? It' like Dr.Phil asking, "How's Bush V Gore working for you?" 50 years from naow if you say to me that you did not nkow that is a lie as I told you - just like alan derswhwitz and Paul Stevens. You may deny the knowledge; denying the dead bodies? That means you are denying actual reality. What did you say when Bush denied global warming? You called him liar and you told me that if this was a true belief then he was mentally ill.
I do not care what you 'think'. You have begun via use of incorrect, wrong and.faulty science. Belieiving Darwin is 100 % correct ties everything up in a neat little bow but: Why no fossil record? I know why. Do you? And no, it is not God waved some sort of magic want either. You, your own self, decided that was my peronal belief. You had to - then you ciould justify what you NEEDED me to belive or else: Your chain of causation falls a part. I do not have beliefs as: A belif you can support with evidece rising beyond ANY & ALL reeasonable doubt is then FACT.
Movement of North Pole:
PHYSICAL: Earth's crust moving independenttly from core. PLUS
METAPHYSICAL: magnetic North Pole re-tracing our journey to here, North Amereica.
This journey, which began in Africa, partly (as only some pf us went this way), went North up to and across the no longer existent Bering land bridge and down. Follow the DNA: you do have to 'believe' me as we can trace our DNA PLUS the fossil record we do have PLUS the acheaolological record we do have. I own ZERO beliefs that can not be proven as false or true. For instance, Is the sky blue? We can prove there is physical phenomenon thta make the sky appear to be blue. The very first thing we define is "blue". Then, we can prove thta ther is an ACTUAL REAASON the sky apears tp be 'blue'. Someone named 'blue' blue, get it?
I said as I know as fact ALL in the entire universe is physical & metaphysical. You may have some dire need to 'believe' God is not actual reality (justifies unehtical behavior or makes it easer to do nothing with you life as then their are zero consequences, etc. etc.) but: unless you are the God you cannot make what is NOT actual reality suddenly real anymore than you can make what is actual reality suddenly not real.
For instance, Is string theory real? Yes, there is a nactaul theory named string heory that attempts to reason how and/or why the universe perates. Is string theory correct? No, it is not. What is your proof that demonstrates this theory is incorect? 1, String theorists sometimes change their numbers to 'fit' thier model of the universe 2, The science does not 'match' the words as in the person is beginnig with a false perception of what 'belief' is or is not and 3, (last but not least) the person /s has ZERO evice evidece; perhaps I should say it is not about belif but evidecne...does this person even know waht ACTUAL evidence is? Because if they do then they need to REASON NOT EXPLAIN how and why they did not realize Bush V Gore was unconstituttional...I mean, making the true statement that is was unconsitututional is a very diferent theng than knowing the REASON.
You know what else? WHO said provong God was not possible? WHERE or HOW - REASON - that provong aything as either true or false is not possible? Of all things only God is not provable as either true or false? What actual law exists that is supported by evidence whihc risess to oroof states that of all things, only Gpd can not be proven? For all you ateists:
IF God cannot be proven as false than doesn't God then exist w/o me bringing forth any eviecen? Ad. if god an be proven as real and actuall, then why would you inists that Susan is full of ****?
My results and al of my evidence cam be sujected to examination - scinetific examintaion. We can measure them to see if they actully met the burden of proof standard and/or match what I theorize they will. It is not like e have to sit around guessing. We do measure teh magntic north pole you know. We can also conduct an experiment and then avaluate the results. Or, are you only willing to alow Einstein to theorize and then measure the reults in order to see if his PREEICTION - HIS STATEMENT OF FACT AS IN " 'X' WIL HAPPEN "?
I'm no dolt. I nkow EACTLY what it would mean to all of you if I was allowe to proce that actual reality. It would mean: Man , I gott behave in an ethical mannaer.
I suggest you learn what belief actually is. All belief is not made up...ever hear of TRUE BELIEF? All belif is bnot persojnal.
BTW: is it lost of you that all of you belived as real and fact an mistaken beif known as Bush V Gore? It is an actual federal ruling; WHO ever told you it was legal or that the mathc was good? 'Cause Rhenquist did not. He wrote what he wrote on a piece of a paper...NO WHERE & NO HOW ddi he prove his amth was good or that it matched our law and in actually reality? He PROVED it does not match the exact wrs of our exact law as: Are you gona try to tell me Justices get two votes? Are you gona try tp tel me that I was not heard in US Supreme Court? That none of this happened and that we d o not exist? LOL!
Judaism is a real. Is it how the God wants us to live? Hell yeah...excep frp what man then corupted. How do I know? Samw way i nkow avout other eligions...it all came from God except what man then dicked with - the 7 major ones - as:
It matches our two governing documents. Even the double helix of DNA and baptism are in our law. Is Jesus as THE Son of God? No. Is multiple mariages? No. Is not eatong meat of Friday? No. Is confirmation? Yes, the concept is as in reincarnation. You know what else is? Checking an balancing your own self. That's called accountability & responsibility.
Hey, don't blame me if you feel stupid and/or suffer from a denial of reality...denying reality is what human beings do when they cannot JUSTIFY the personal policies that they hold in their head as TRUE and often act upon.... don't blame me if you do not know the difference between 'explanation' and 'reason' or what proof is or is not and when it rises to a level beyond REASONABLE doubt. See, we can test my theory...in fact - I did. If it were not actual reality then I would not have been heard in US Supreme Court.
You nkow what else? I would not possess a still sealed letter from John Edwards regarding the VICE PRESIDENCY, HIS WIFE & A PERSONAL DETAIL & postmarked last year. I have an opened letter from Pat Roberts that hubby had to dick with; I say do not open it as its the result of an experiment testing my theory and he has to epen it as like 99% of men he's benn allowed to play the 'I have no self control' aka 'poor me i'm Bil clinton' game.
If you need more proof otherthan SCIENCE (proof is proof; more means you are changing the condition) thna why do'nt you ask me a question that you BELIEVE a persn canot answer such has Why is ther more matter than antimatter or how did we come to be on Earth? Be thoughtful; none of this What color is my hair crap? as while I could answer that it is wasted energy as it does not benefit mankind OR SO I BELIEVE.
Oh - Once you read it then you know it. Meaning: If 50 years from now you come to own something as fact, you do no then get to claim igniranc fri the 50 you did not. You can try to say "But she sounded crazy" or "I did not belive it" I but so what? If you read all about golabal warming and why then you know. Picking & choosong belifs has ZERO to do with acting them out as in: Try it on for size. What are your results? It' like Dr.Phil asking, "How's Bush V Gore working for you?" 50 years from naow if you say to me that you did not nkow that is a lie as I told you - just like alan derswhwitz and Paul Stevens. You may deny the knowledge; denying the dead bodies? That means you are denying actual reality. What did you say when Bush denied global warming? You called him liar and you told me that if this was a true belief then he was mentally ill.
Mr.Dysfunctional
Well-Known Member
Retracting my statement .. could not find the labratory studies I had heard about..
Apolgize for it... but everything else still stands
Werbung:
Mr.Dysfunctional
Well-Known Member
Regardless of the view points presented ..its still borders on the lines of mystism.. who cares anyways? its an objective truth.
Ethier you believe or do not believe. however you can never simply prove to someone it does.. you have to make them BELIEVE!!!
Ethier you believe or do not believe. however you can never simply prove to someone it does.. you have to make them BELIEVE!!!
