Vyddo
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Messages
- 44
Sarah Palin opposes abortion in essentially all circumstances. However, she is also an avid hunter. There is a logical inconsistency in this pair of positions. How is it that Palin opposes killing fetuses but supports killing nonhuman animals who have a greater level of self-awareness, rationality, and a greater capacity to feel pain than a fetus does?
Wow, just wow..
Palin's Abortion stance is:
She favor's human life, in all instances barring there being danger to the expectant mother.
Now, I understand that liberals disagree with this and favor choice over life.. but to act as if this position is outrageous is just silly. Palin favor's life and it's a reasonable position that is shared by many Americans. You disagree with it, fine.
In regards to the comparison of Human Life to that of an animal's.. just shame on you. Your deluding yourself with your own argument and I have to believe most Americans would label your argument as bunk.
You label a "fetus" and fail to acknowledge that it's human in your statement. That fetus is human, that's the difference.