On same sex marriage and proprietary brand names

[cashmcall]

no one fucking cares what you or they like. People did not like slavery ending, or Blacks voting, or inter racial marraige. No one fucking cares...Rights are not given based on a poll. Equality is not based on if some other church deems you worthy of marriage when your own did. One day people will look back and think how the hell did people even justify preventing it in the first place..See the problem is the only defense you have is your own personal backward belifes...And those have no legal meaning.

That argument works both ways.. bottom line it's not marriage .. IMO they don't have the right to change the definition of marriage.

 

[dogtowner]

That argument works both ways.. bottom line it's not marriage .. IMO they don't have the right to change the definition of marriage.

no. no they do not.

 

[pocketfullofshells]

I see, they don't only you can...After all its well known that only Christians get married, and it never changes...ever...ignorance is amazing. One day you will all be banned, because some other group will end your marriages with a vote..

 

[Texas_tea]

Definition of MARRIAGE

a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law.

The Supreme Court Can't Unilaterally Change the Definition of Marriage


The fact of the matter is that after the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) became law under President Clinton's signature in 1996, a large majority of states affirmed the male-female definition. Many have done so by amending their state constitutions, and this all took place within the past 20 years.

Clearly, one can disagree with DOMA's definition of marriage, and the American people are free to repeal DOMA and endorse same-sex unions. But it would be a different thing altogether for the Supreme Court to redefine marriage

 

[pocketfullofshells]

Definition of MARRIAGE

a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law.

The Supreme Court Can't Unilaterally Change the Definition of Marriage


The fact of the matter is that after the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) became law under President Clinton's signature in 1996, a large majority of states affirmed the male-female definition. Many have done so by amending their state constitutions, and this all took place within the past 20 years.

Clearly, one can disagree with DOMA's definition of marriage, and the American people are free to repeal DOMA and endorse same-sex unions. But it would be a different thing altogether for the Supreme Court to redefine marriage

Oooooo you mean that law that was found Unconstitutional...I mean not that you guys realy care about that...unless it suits you.

Just admit you don't like Equality and don't care about other Religions and people who have different Religious beliefs then you.

 

[Texas_tea]

Just admit you don't like Equality and don't care about other Religions and people who have different Religious beliefs then you.

That would be the angry liberals who do not care about religion or equality unless it suits them.

Typical wacko leftist comment ... always the stark opposite of reality!

 

[pocketfullofshells]

That would be the angry liberals who do not care about religion or equality unless it suits them.

Typical wacko leftist comment ... always the stark opposite of reality!

guess what , there are Churches who support same sex marriage...you are the one blocking there Religious views. And thats not counting Atheist and Agnostics who you;s religion you ignore. ( or lack of)

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

The word "marriage" is not copyrighted, nor can it be.