What we have here are fraud deniers claiming one thing and fraud opponents claiming another.
and courts decided the fraud claimers were not credible. that's how life words. you morons failed.
What we have here are fraud deniers claiming one thing and fraud opponents claiming another.
Experts agree that voting machines are extremely vulnerable to corruption and fraud but the experts refuse to provide evidence either proving or disproving voter fraud.
Consider this report from IT experts who examined voting machines in Antrim County Michigan after the 2020 election:
Microsoft Word - Antrim Michigan Forensics Report 121320(9).docx (depernolaw.com)
15. Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software. Removal of these files violates state law and prevents a meaningful audit, even if the Secretary wanted to conduct an audit. We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.
Deny all you want.
Not extremely vulnerable? How about dangerously vulnerable or do Democrats like vulnerable when they are in charge of the voting machines?show where they say they are "EXTREMELY vulnterable" *****.
I wish you would try to prove the election fraud was "small" instead of just saying that with no support."failed" at an "alarming rate"? lol. meaningless, vague words.
we will NEVER have a truly "error free" election, m,oron. but the errors have been small and usually corrected and are not "massive" duh
Courts never found fraud because they did not look for fraud. That was not their job.and courts decided the fraud claimers were not credible. that's how life words. you morons failed.
You are right in pointing out that fraud deniers are on both sides of the stupid political aisle.asog were "it experts"? certainly not election experts. Even republicans said they were wrong:
After innumerable hours over many months, watching, listening, and reading both in-person testimony and various other accounts, I am confident in asserting that the results of the November 2020 General Election in Michigan were accurately represented by the certified and audited results.
Loading…
www.misenategop.com
and
Michigan expert debunks infamous report on Antrim County election as 'meaningless'
A University of Michigan computer science expert says the much-discussed December 2020 report by supporters of Donald Trump on election results in Antrim County "contains an extraordinary number of false, inaccurate or unsubstantiated statements."
Michigan expert debunks infamous report on Antrim County election as 'meaningless'
\www.detroitnews.com
you morons hired other morons. lol
Don't worry. I am not going to give BObama a hard time over his claim to religion(s).yes, out of context clip. see my other post. even the right wing washington times thinks that clip was BS. lol
obama said that mccain didn't say he was a muslim, that was the discussion point. obama didn't say he was a muslim he was talking about what OTHERS were saying about him.
god you're stupid. lol
Don't care if you were going to. Just laughing at youDon't worry. I am not going to give BObama a hard time over his claim to religion(s).
Yes both parties have intelligent people.You are right in pointing out that fraud deniers are on both sides of the stupid political aisle.
Their job was to evaluate evidence of fraud and found it lackingCourts never found fraud because they did not look for fraud. That was not their job.
I don't have to prove anything gI wish you would try to prove the election fraud was "small" instead of just saying that with no support.
Loading…
centralcitynews.us
How Election Was StolenThe Scandal of the CenturyAnalysis ShowsObvious FraudBy Computer inStates of GA, PAFake Votes Were Reported in Multiples of 4,800 Votes in GA,6,000 in PA in Identical Fashion
New York Times Election Report Reveals104,984 Stolen Votes in Ga, 347,768 in PA
Timestamp UTC Trump Biden TrumpLead New Trump New Biden Change 4,800AN AMAZING CONSISTENCY IN REPORTED RESULTS — At 16:35 UTC on Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2020, President Trump was leading Joe Biden in the State of Georgia by 103,997 votes. Over the next seven days, Biden picked up 104,984 votes from 16 vote dumps. Amazingly, all of the vote dumps were either 4,800 votes each or a multiple of 4,800. The same thing happened in Pennsylvania, where a series of 44 vote dumps in multiples of 6,000 each resulted in 347,786 votes for Joe Biden.
Don't get too intimate with BO, however, because he has still got to answer to God for paving the way for newborns to be murdered, and God's judgment might burn hot against his friends as well if they are standing too close.Don't care if you were going to. Just laughing at you
You should not be so stout in your refusal to believe the evidence that indicates the Democrats exploited voting machine vulnerabilities that everyone knows still exist in those machines.Yes both parties have intelligent people.
Fraud believers aren't some of them
That's the dumbest evidence. Doesn't prove fraud at all lolI wish you would try to prove the election fraud was "small" instead of just saying that with no support.
Loading…
centralcitynews.us
How Election Was StolenThe Scandal of the CenturyAnalysis ShowsObvious FraudBy Computer inStates of GA, PAFake Votes Were Reported in Multiples of 4,800 Votes in GA,6,000 in PA in Identical Fashion
New York Times Election Report Reveals104,984 Stolen Votes in Ga, 347,768 in PA
Timestamp UTC Trump Biden TrumpLead New Trump New Biden Change 4,800AN AMAZING CONSISTENCY IN REPORTED RESULTS — At 16:35 UTC on Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2020, President Trump was leading Joe Biden in the State of Georgia by 103,997 votes. Over the next seven days, Biden picked up 104,984 votes from 16 vote dumps. Amazingly, all of the vote dumps were either 4,800 votes each or a multiple of 4,800. The same thing happened in Pennsylvania, where a series of 44 vote dumps in multiples of 6,000 each resulted in 347,786 votes for Joe Biden.