New evidence shows a likelihood that more than 14 million fraudulent mail-in votes were cast in 2020

[Phoenix68]

.

.

.

.

.​

 

[LittleGreenMan]

Is there any wonder that Joe Biden is running because he's the best Dems have to offer? Let me say that again. Joe, crooked as a dog's hind leg, stinks like dog's hind end, not much smarter than a dog, shits on the carpet, can't be trusted to not grab something off the table when nobody's there to watch him, sleeps on the couch, sniffs the ladies every chance he gets regardless of who's watching, -that Joe, is the best that the Dems can come up with! But he's good enough for Dems who are universally just like him.

 

[pjmret]

Is there any wonder that Joe Biden is running because he's the best Dems have to offer? Let me say that again. Joe, crooked as a dog's hind leg, stinks like dog's hind end, not much smarter than a dog, shits on the carpet, can't be trusted to not grab something off the table when nobody's there to watch him, sleeps on the couch, sniffs the ladies every chance he gets regardless of who's watching, -that Joe, is the best that the Dems can come up with! But he's good enough for Dems who are universally just like him.

Yes 50 million Americans are all just like him lol

You righties say the dumbest things

 

[mark francis]

because that's how the legal system and logic works.
those who make claims need to prove them. duh.

otherwise they look like pathetic whiners

You make it sound like lefties never claim anything they do not prove, yet you claim but do not prove that evidence of 2020 voting fraud is false.

 

[Boris Norris]

Lefties cannot prove the voting fraud evidence is false like they claim, so why should I have to prove anything to you?

It's the same as you believing there's a god. Why should I have to prove there isn't. You made the claim you prove it.
That basic principle seems to never enter you head.

 

[pjmret]

You make it sound like lefties never claim anything they do not prove, yet you claim but do not prove that evidence of 2020 voting fraud is false.

no, i make it sound like you never prove anything you claim, because you dont

 

[mark francis]

Yes 50 million Americans are all just like him lol

You righties say the dumbest things

No, 50 million Americans do not want coal and oil companies shut down and mandates to buy and drive electric vehicles as the Democrats are currently promoting.

 

[pjmret]

No, 50 million Americans do not want coal and oil companies shut down and mandates to buy and drive electric vehicles as the Democrats are currently promoting.

You completely missed it lol

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

While leftist and their supporters dishonestly claim there was no 2020 voter fraud, the facts prove otherwise. Here is a brief summary of the massive 2020 voting fraud:

New poll finds rampant mail-in voting fraud in the 2020 election | Blaze Media (theblaze.com) 12-12-23
New poll finds rampant mail-in voting fraud in the 2020 election

One in five voters who cast mail-in ballots during the 2020 presidential election admit to participating in at least one kind of voter fraud, according to a new poll conducted by Rasmussen Reports and the Heartland Institute. ...
According to the Cook Political Report, 158,397,726 votes were cast for Joe Biden, Donald Trump, or another candidate in 2020. Taking 9% of this total, that means more than 14 million ballots cast in 2020 were fraudulent. Again, this is just the most conservative estimate — the total number of fraudulent ballots was likely much higher.

Moreover, the survey reveals that fraudulent voting may not have been purely limited to mail-in ballots. Eight percent of all survey respondents — not only those who cast mail-in ballots — admitted that a friend, family member, or organization (such as a political party) offered to pay or reward them for voting. ...
In 2020, several states also allowed ballot harvesting, which allows third-party individuals to collect and submit mail-in ballots on behalf of voters, although evidence shows ballot harvesting is “ripe for voter fraud and abuse.” ...
There are many reasons why mail-in voting is less reliable than in-person voting.

For starters, state voter rolls are notoriously inaccurate. In 2012, the Pew Center on the States analyzed state voter registration rolls and found that “approximately 24 million — one of every eight — voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or are significantly inaccurate. More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters. Approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.” ...
In 2012, the New York Times ran an article headlined, “Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises,” which similarly concluded that “votes cast by mail are less likely to be counted, more likely to be compromised and more likely to be contested than those cast in a voting booth.” ...

That isn't actually evidence. That's a baseless attempt at correlation using an ad hoc meta analysis.

 

[mark francis]

That isn't actually evidence. That's a baseless attempt at correlation using an ad hoc meta analysis.

Pointing out that evidence of voting fraud has not been irrefutably proven does not serve as some sort of proof that massive voting fraud did not occur.

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

Pointing out that evidence of voting fraud has not been irrefutably proven does not serve as some sort of proof that massive voting fraud did not occur.

Agreed. But since nobody has to meet that burden of proof, that's fine. That isn't how the world works.

And you essentially admit you believe something without good evidence.

 

[mark francis]

Agreed. But since nobody has to meet that burden of proof, that's fine. That isn't how the world works.

And you essentially admit you believe something without good evidence.

Democrats and rubes claim the way the world works is fine, even if evidence of voting fraud is deemed insufficient reason to conduct investigations into the fraud.

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

Democrats and rubes claim the way the world works is fine, even if evidence of voting fraud is deemed insufficient reason to conduct investigations into the fraud.

The way the world works is that nobody has to disprove intellectually deviant, unevidenced claims. Not ever. And the democrats have no say in that.

 

[mark francis]

The way the world works is that nobody has to disprove intellectually deviant, unevidenced claims. Not ever. And the democrats have no say in that.

Democrats cannot disprove facts so their best hope is to claim those who doubt the truthfulness of their claim of voting fraud innocence are evil.

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

Democrats cannot disprove facts so their best hope is to claim those who doubt the truthfulness of their claim of voting fraud innocence are evil.

There are no facts to disprove. Else they would be taken to court. Nobody has to lift a finger to disprove unevidenced claims. That's why yu are in the internet, instead of in a courtroom.