Navarro's blistering 36-page report alleging Biden's outright voter fraud

[pjmret]

You are misunderstanding what Senator Paul correctly stated. He did not state that courts did not rule that there was insufficient evidence presented to them to justify taking on a voter fraud case. Paul said no judge ruled that voter fraud did not occur. The statements are not the same.

courts don't rule that. duh. they rule on the evidence presented.

they aren't investigative bodies. duh.

however, the DOJ and DHS DID say the election didn't have massive fraud.

The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) - released the following statement:

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud​

credible republicans agree there was no massive fraud

 

[pjmret]

Evidence of official knowledge fraud is plentiful.

Caught on Tape: Democratic Election Official Admits, 'There is a Lot of Voter Fraud'

Myth?

townhall.com

In the video, NYC Democratic Commissioner of the Board of Elections Alan Schulkin is caught on hidden camera at a United Federation of Teachers holiday party admitting that there is widespread voter fraud in New York City. “Yeah, they should ask for your ID. I think there is a lot of voter fraud,” said Schulkin, who elaborated on the types of voter fraud that are taking place in New York...“You know, I don’t think it’s too much to ask somebody to show some kind of an ID…Like I say, people don’t realize, certain neighborhoods in particular they bus people around to vote,” said Schulman.

and yet no one can actually show proof of widespread fraud.
its so "widespread" no one can find it. lol

by the way, he "thinks" there is a "lot" of fraud...whatever "lots" means, and for what elections? lol. and again, no proof of it. just..opinions. from one guy.

 

[mark francis]

Theres one thing you keep avoiding and that is, Biden won and was certified without any detected fraud. So bang on all you like, the party's over son. You.lost.

I do not admit there was no evidence of fraud but I will admit that is what democrats claim but cannot support with logical and believable explanations for all the appearances they claim were not fraud.

 

[pjmret]

" Connect the Dots: The US Smartmatic voting system wasn’t designed in America but in communist Venezuela, first used by Dictator Hugo Chavez, sponsored by his government as co-owner, educated by Bitza state software. A mere 16 years ago. Designed and first deployed to defraud a recall election, claims CIA. Today, Venezuela is a failed nation whose people are trapped in a living hell, dying without food or medicine. This might not have happened if Smartmatic had not willfully cooperated in election fraud. Smartmatic was then deployed to America where it is now in the midst of apparent massive election fraud"

so "massive" it can't be found. lol.

to republican morons, "connect the dots" means "believe what you ant to believe"

 

[pjmret]

I do not admit there was no evidence of fraud but I will admit that is what democrats claim but cannot support with logical and believable explanations for all the appearances they claim were not fraud.

i keep posting explanations. lol.

post something specific you believe is credible proof of fraud, and post the your proof of it.

 

[mark francis]

Nice word play son but it means nothing. There was no evidence of any fraud. You seem to have a problem grasping the principle of no evidence.

The gop conducted their investigation and found nothing. You might be wise to consult them about the predicament they have placed your defence.

Failing to see the fraud does not mean no fraud occurred. That is true whether it is a judge, a priest, a guru, a politician, or whoever who claims he sees no fraud.

 

[mark francis]

courts don't rule that. duh. they rule on the evidence presented.

they aren't investigative bodies. duh.

however, the DOJ and DHS DID say the election didn't have massive fraud.

The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) - released the following statement:

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud​

credible republicans agree there was no massive fraud

Of course no court proved no fraud occurred because fraud did occur and courts refused to look into all the evidence presented.

 

[mark francis]

and yet no one can actually show proof of widespread fraud.
its so "widespread" no one can find it. lol

by the way, he "thinks" there is a "lot" of fraud...whatever "lots" means, and for what elections? lol. and again, no proof of it. just..opinions. from one guy.

Proof of voter fraud cannot be seen by individuals who simply refuse to believe democrat rioters, looters, arsonists, gangsters, racist cop and white haters would ever commit voter fraud and lie about it.

 

[pjmret]

Failing to see the fraud does not mean no fraud occurred. That is true whether it is a judge, a priest, a guru, a politician, or whoever who claims he sees no fraud.

failing to provide credible evidence of fraud and claiming there is fraud is the sign of a *****. or mental illness

 

[pjmret]

Proof of voter fraud cannot be seen by individuals who simply refuse to believe democrat rioters, looters, arsonists, gangsters, racist cop and white haters would ever commit voter fraud and lie about it.

and yet you can't even convince republican judges or fox news (for examples) that your evidence of fraud is credible.
hahahah
hahahahha

"massive" and "widespread" fraud that has no credible evidence after 2 YEARS of frantic searching by republicans?
ya gotta be a ***** to believe in it

 

[mark francis]

" Connect the Dots: The US Smartmatic voting system wasn’t designed in America but in communist Venezuela, first used by Dictator Hugo Chavez, sponsored by his government as co-owner, educated by Bitza state software. A mere 16 years ago. Designed and first deployed to defraud a recall election, claims CIA. Today, Venezuela is a failed nation whose people are trapped in a living hell, dying without food or medicine. This might not have happened if Smartmatic had not willfully cooperated in election fraud. Smartmatic was then deployed to America where it is now in the midst of apparent massive election fraud"

so "massive" it can't be found. lol.

to republican morons, "connect the dots" means "believe what you ant to believe"

Voting machine firm: Venezuela vote rigged "without any doubt"

Lending credence to President Nicolas Maduro's opponents, voting tech company says numbers inflated by at least 1 million

www.cbsnews.com

Smartmatic (Soros' company) officials themselves admitted their voting machines flipped votes.

WORLD

Voting machine firm: Venezuela vote rigged "without any doubt"​

 

[pjmret]

Voting machine firm: Venezuela vote rigged "without any doubt"

Lending credence to President Nicolas Maduro's opponents, voting tech company says numbers inflated by at least 1 million

www.cbsnews.com

Smartmatic (Soros' company) officials themselves admitted their voting machines flipped votes.

WORLD

Voting machine firm: Venezuela vote rigged "without any doubt"​

not sure where YOU live, but WE are talking about the election in america not venezuela. lol.
no doubt voting in OTHER COUNTRIES can be rigged. duh.

where is the evidence that happened in THIS country. duh again

god you're stupid

ps - from the article: "Antonio Mugica said results recorded by his systems and those reported by Venezuela's National Electoral Council indicate "without any doubt" that official turnout figures were inflated. "Even in moments of deep political conflict and division we have been satisfied with the voting process and the count has been completely accurate," Mugica told reporters in London" he isn't saying HIS MACHINES flipped votes, *****, he is saying the government REPORTED bogus numbers.

you can't even read a simple article and understand it. hahahahah

 

[mark francis]

i keep posting explanations. lol.

post something specific you believe is credible proof of fraud, and post the your proof of it.

Nobody can prove voting machines in Georgia were not corrupted because many if not most of the images of ballots that were required by law to be kept for 24 months after the election have either disappeared or were never recorded in the first place. That itself is a major election law violation and that violation alone makes Georgia's vote count unreliable.

Election Integrity Group: Most 2020 Ballot Images from 56 Georgia Counties Have Been Destroyed (westernjournal.com)

Election Integrity Group: Most 2020 Ballot Images from 56 Georgia Counties Have Been Destroyed

By Grant Atkinson November 10, 2021 at 4:59pm

A year after the election day in 2020, concerns still linger about election integrity in many states. This does not mean the election results are deeply in question, but it does suggest a need for more secure election processes next cycle.

According to Just the News, election integrity group VoterGA filed an Open Records Requests regarding the alleged destruction of ballot images from the 2020 election in Georgia. Their findings were stunning.

VoterGA said 74 Georgia counties had failed to produce the images, and it said 56 counties confirmed “most or all of the images” had been destroyed.

The images were automatically created by Dominion Voting Systems machines for tabulating votes, Just the News reported. The outlet said these images are “crucial for election records.”

Ballot images for people who voted in person are stored on compact flash memory cards. For ballots that were mailed in, the images are stored on flash drives.

After the elections, the most populated counties use scanners to transfer the images to the Election Management Server. Less populated counties manually upload the flash drives and cards to the server.

According to Just the News, federal law requires these images to be kept for 22 months post-election. In Georgia, state law dictates that the images be kept for 24 months.

Despite that, the election integrity group said the images are nowhere to be seen just 12 months after the 2020 presidential election.

“At least 28 counties admitted having no original images at all and 22 of those counties only had recount images that some claimed are the same as originals,” VoterGA said.

Even if the recount images are the same as the originals, VoterGA said they are not as useful. Recount images lack original timestamps and meta data that the original images have.

For that reason, Just the News reported recount images are invalid for audits since “they can be changed by tampering between scans.”

The mere fact that many counties could not provide ballot images does not necessarily mean the election results were inaccurate. However, it does cast even more doubt on an already suspect election process in Georgia.

One of Georgia’s largest counties, DeKalb, has experienced a litany of issues since the election. According to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, DeKalb County elections director Erica Hamilton was placed on leave without explanation in early September, and she later resigned.

In addition, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger opened a probe into DeKalb County drop boxes from the election, according to a separate article from Just the News.

Related:

After Stacey Abrams Shamelessly Tells 'The View' 'I Have Never Denied That I Lost,' She's Brutally and Quickly Exposed as a Liar

“The investigation includes not only whether DeKalb County properly complied with the documentation required by the State Election Board but also whether the actual procedures used by DeKalb adequately protected chain of custody for ballots returned to drop boxes,” the secretary of state’s office said in September.

When Georgia passed new laws to shore up future elections, leftists went crazy and accused them of suppressing minority voters. Major League Baseball even moved the All-Star Game out of Atlanta because of the new regulations.

In order to ensure American confidence in elections, malpractice must be addressed quickly and thoroughly. The latest issue in Georgia is another reminder that we still have a long way to go in the fight for election integrity.​

 

[pjmret]

Nobody can prove voting machines in Georgia were not corrupted because many if not most of the images of ballots that were required by law to be kept for 24 months after the election have either disappeared or were never recorded in the first place. That itself is a major election law violation and that violation alone makes Georgia's vote count unreliable.

Election Integrity Group: Most 2020 Ballot Images from 56 Georgia Counties Have Been Destroyed (westernjournal.com)

Election Integrity Group: Most 2020 Ballot Images from 56 Georgia Counties Have Been Destroyed

By Grant Atkinson November 10, 2021 at 4:59pm

A year after the election day in 2020, concerns still linger about election integrity in many states. This does not mean the election results are deeply in question, but it does suggest a need for more secure election processes next cycle.

According to Just the News, election integrity group VoterGA filed an Open Records Requests regarding the alleged destruction of ballot images from the 2020 election in Georgia. Their findings were stunning.

VoterGA said 74 Georgia counties had failed to produce the images, and it said 56 counties confirmed “most or all of the images” had been destroyed.

The images were automatically created by Dominion Voting Systems machines for tabulating votes, Just the News reported. The outlet said these images are “crucial for election records.”

Ballot images for people who voted in person are stored on compact flash memory cards. For ballots that were mailed in, the images are stored on flash drives.

After the elections, the most populated counties use scanners to transfer the images to the Election Management Server. Less populated counties manually upload the flash drives and cards to the server.

According to Just the News, federal law requires these images to be kept for 22 months post-election. In Georgia, state law dictates that the images be kept for 24 months.

Despite that, the election integrity group said the images are nowhere to be seen just 12 months after the 2020 presidential election.

“At least 28 counties admitted having no original images at all and 22 of those counties only had recount images that some claimed are the same as originals,” VoterGA said.

Even if the recount images are the same as the originals, VoterGA said they are not as useful. Recount images lack original timestamps and meta data that the original images have.

For that reason, Just the News reported recount images are invalid for audits since “they can be changed by tampering between scans.”

The mere fact that many counties could not provide ballot images does not necessarily mean the election results were inaccurate. However, it does cast even more doubt on an already suspect election process in Georgia.

One of Georgia’s largest counties, DeKalb, has experienced a litany of issues since the election. According to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, DeKalb County elections director Erica Hamilton was placed on leave without explanation in early September, and she later resigned.

In addition, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger opened a probe into DeKalb County drop boxes from the election, according to a separate article from Just the News.

Related:

After Stacey Abrams Shamelessly Tells 'The View' 'I Have Never Denied That I Lost,' She's Brutally and Quickly Exposed as a Liar

“The investigation includes not only whether DeKalb County properly complied with the documentation required by the State Election Board but also whether the actual procedures used by DeKalb adequately protected chain of custody for ballots returned to drop boxes,” the secretary of state’s office said in September.

When Georgia passed new laws to shore up future elections, leftists went crazy and accused them of suppressing minority voters. Major League Baseball even moved the All-Star Game out of Atlanta because of the new regulations.

In order to ensure American confidence in elections, malpractice must be addressed quickly and thoroughly. The latest issue in Georgia is another reminder that we still have a long way to go in the fight for election integrity.​

still no evidence of fraud. lol

and no it doesn't make it "unreliable", *****. maybe you can claim it can't be "confirmed' 2 YEARS later, but that's not "unreliable". And are those ONLY democratic run counties..in red state georgia? that's a key question in claiming 2020 democratic fraud.

and were these images retained in prior elections, or is this just how they've been doing it forever? that's a key question in terms of claiming 2020 democratic fraud.

from the ***** who can't even read simple stories about venezuela and thinks it somehow proves something here.

 

[mark francis]

still no evidence of fraud. lol

and no it doesn't make it "unreliable", *****. maybe you can claim it can't be "confirmed' 2 YEARS later, but that's not "unreliable". And are those ONLY democratic run counties..in red state georgia? that's a key question in claiming 2020 democratic fraud.

and were these images retained in prior elections, or is this just how they've been doing it forever? that's a key question in terms of claiming 2020 democratic fraud.

from the ***** who can't even read simple stories about venezuela and thinks it somehow proves something here.

Democrats shot themselves in the foot by destroying photo images of ballots in 2020 in clear violation of election laws. Now democrats cannot possibly prove that they did not run illegitimate ballots through their machines as observers claimed in sworn testimony. Not only that but there is still the matter of election fraud for destroying photo images of ballots they were not supposed to destroy.