Navarro's blistering 36-page report alleging Biden's outright voter fraud

[mark francis]

Wrong again.
I'll repeat, no one has produced the evidence which would swing an election. Rand Paul produced nothing but his interpretation but still NO EVIDENCE.
Are you completely ignorant to what evidence is? You can't be that dumb but I might be wrong.

You are misunderstanding what Senator Paul correctly stated. He did not state that courts did not rule that there was insufficient evidence presented to them to justify taking on a voter fraud case. Paul said no judge ruled that voter fraud did not occur. The statements are not the same.

 

[mark francis]

completely wrong, of course, as I posted already. Republicans presented their evidence, the courts looked at it and said it had no merit.

he's a ***** and so are you

You misunderstand. Paul did not say courts did not reject voter fraud cases due to the insufficient evidence to go to trial. He said that, in spite of the insufficient presented to them thus far, the judges still did not see evidence to rule that voter fraud did not occur.

 

[mark francis]

H

Here is a direct quote from your piece.

There were no widespread issues with the 2020 election in Fulton County.

The voting machines that Republicans want to look at were decertified because another company without election experience examined those machines last year. It found nothing consequential.

Georgia officials claimed machines in Georgia that were examined by non-democrats were damaged somehow. That seems to me to be politically biased and therefore untrustworthy. Democrats can examine the machines but republicans cannot. Why are democrats given exclusive control of American voting machines? In spite of the massive number opf problems the machines had in the 2020 democrat primary, the democrat primary of 2022 proved the machines were corrupt, and a hand count examination of the ballots proved the machine had flipped votes and the election was therefore overturned as a result of the hand-count examination of the votes tabulated by the corrupted machines.

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes” | The Wentworth Report

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes”. By Emerald Robinson.

According to the local paper Decaturish: DeKalb County (GA) just released the results of a hand count in the District 2County Commission primary race — and the hand count revealed such massive discrepancies between the May 24th machine results and the June 1 hand count that it has flipped the race! …

The machines did not count 2,810 votes at all — mostly from Election Day ballots. That’s almost 20% of the total votes that mysteriously disappeared …

The machines also counted only 589 votes for the candidate Michelle Long Spears on May 24th and placed her third in the race but the June 1st hand count discovered 3,491 more votes for her. Suddenly, she’s winning the race. …

The real bombshell is why there was a hand count conducted at all in this race. It only happened because the candidate Michelle Long Spears took pictures of the precinct-level results and showed them to the local media site Decaturish and those machine “results” showed that Michelle Long Spears was getting zero votes in her own precinct. In other words: obvious fraud. …

New and corrupt databases created ! Mistakes in the precinct scanners! Thousands of votes not counted! Thousands of votes miscounted for multiple candidates! Hand counts conducted to correct the machine counts!

Guess what folks: it’s called election fraud using the electronic voting machines.

Are you ready for the best part of the story?

It’s a primary race for Democrats.

Paper ballots, hand counted under scrutiny by all interested parties. Until then, US election results are not credible

 

[mark francis]

again, list the democrats who are doing this.
i keep asking, you keep posting vague rightwing stupidity

OK. It is not just democrats refusing to allow forensics examiners accepted by the republican party to examine the machines. Public officials of both parties refuse to allow non-democrat examiners to forensically examine the questionable machines for flaws in the 2020 election.

Why would elections officials destroy ballot images by the thousands before all the issues of fraud have been settled? Ballot images from voting machines could help confirm whether the machine was compromised or not, so why were the images destroyed before examiners could examine the voting machines for errors? There is a strong possibility that fraud occurred and elections officials are now tryin g to hide it.


Ballot Images – A new way to verify that results are true – BlackBoxVoting.org

BALLOT IMAGES – A NEW WAY TO VERIFY THAT RESULTS ARE TRUE

By Bev HarrisNovember 2, 2016ACTIONS, OBSERVATION

This is already available in most systems. Laws are already on the books to authorize you to do this. It costs almost nothing and enables almost everyone to authenticate computerized voting system results. All that remains is cooperation (or court-ordered coercion) of public officials to force them to honor your rights.

It is a one-two punch which makes it very difficult to tamper with results without detection – no matter who administers the system, what vendors they use, or who gets their hands on the computer code. If you do this, it won’t matter if it’s the Russians or some local good ol’ boy sticking hands into the system, because you can catch them.

There is a word we use in popular culture today: Crowd sourcing.

What this does is crowd-source the authentication of the vote, in effect letting any and all persons verify ALL the votes, and if they want, anyone can do their own full recount of any or all races. And it is virtually free.

TWO PARTS PLUS A NECESSARY LINK-UP

Ballot images – Modern voting systems, and even the touch-screens, even if they are paperless, capture an individual image of each vote. Paper ballots are by far the best, because they are needed for part 2. Think of it like this: As ballots go through the scanner, it takes a photo of each and stores it as an electronic file. (Electronic voting systems self-populate a template, which isn’t as good but still somewhat helpful). These are called “ballot images” and are simply electronic files, like PDF or TIFF or JPG or PNG files. Under freedom of information law, it is your right to get copies of these electronic files. They are (or should be!) anonymous and do not identify voter.

Right to examine actual ballots – After downloading the whole set of ballot images — in essence, your own copy of every ballot — you still need the ability to verify that these electronic images have not been changed. Here’s how that works: A linkage between ballot and ballot image should exist, in the form of a serial number. Not a fancy QR code which can contain hidden identifiers leading back to the voter ID of who cast the ballot. Just a simple unique number, like 10548626. This number appears on both ballot and ballot image. If you want to check whether ballot images are real, you simply examine the actual ballots using your Freedom of Information rights, comparing to make sure the image matches the original.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Fact Check-Claims that 17,690 ballot images from the 2020 Presidential election are missing in Fulton County, Georgia | Reuters

Fact Check-Claims that 17,690 ballot images from the 2020 Presidential election are missing in Fulton County, Georgia

By Reuters Fact Check
Correction July 28, 2022: A previous version of this article stated there was no evidence that 17,690 ballot images were missing in Fulton County, Georgia. Fulton County said some files were not maintained after 2020, but claimed this was not required by the law at the time. This correction changes headline and lede, removes verdict, edits paragraph 8, adds paragraphs 9-13 to include new statements from Fulton County and links to the Georgia Rule pertaining to storage of results for primaries and elections.)

More than a year after U.S. President Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election, social media users are claiming “17,690 ballot images” are missing in Fulton County, Georgia. County officials told Reuters they recounted all ballots from the general election three times. This July 2022 update includes new statements in paragraphs 9-13.

Examples can be seen  here  ,  here  and  here  .

The text in one post reads: “All in-person ballot images are MISSING in Fulton County, GA. Fulton is also missing 17,690 mail-in ballot images – which alone is more than the entire margin in Georgia.”

Some posts include a clip of a press conference given by Garland Favorito, an activist who led the lawsuit against Fulton County alleging election fraud, discussed  here  . The full video can be seen on YouTube here , where Favorito makes the claim that 17,690 ballot images are missing from Fulton County.

One America News Network journalist Christina Bobb said in a tweet (here) on Nov. 9, 2021: “ALL in person ballot images in GA are missing. 17,690 mail in ballot images are missing. This is FRAUD. So, GA has no way to verify that the ballots are legitimate reflections of what went through the machines.”

Gabriel Sterling, chief operating officer for Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, responded to the tweet (here) by saying: “Nothing other than the first count, the hand re-tally, and then the recount. This is a lie…and a truly dumb one at that. They have all of the actual ballots that have been counted 3 times.”

The office of Georgia Secretary of State sent the following statement by Raffensperger to Reuters via email: “Georgia votes with paper ballots, and all of the actual paper ballots from November’s election were counted three times, including a 100 percent hand recount in which teams of poll workers touched and saw every vote cast. There is zero doubt that three counts of the ballots resulted in conclusive results on who won the election in Georgia. Wishful thinking by conspiracy theorists cannot change the outcome, no matter what immaterial technicality they claim to have identified this week.”

Favorito directed Reuters to his website (archive.ph/Au355 ).

In June 2022, Professor of Statistics at Berkeley Philip B. Stark shared a declaration with Reuters (here) (see paragraph 63) where he says, “Fulton County did not produce the image file corresponding to every cast vote record” and “17,852 image files are missing.”

Fulton County officials told Reuters in July 2022 that, “At the time, the law did NOT require that the files be maintained, meaning, there were no requirements or guidelines to maintain ballot images from the ICP scanner used for advance voting and election day before the November 2020 election.” They added that, “Once the law was subsequently clarified, Fulton County complied with keeping the files from then on.”

Georgia Rule 183-1-12-.13 containing sections (a), (b) and (c) and pertaining to the storage of ballot returns in state elections and primaries can be seen (here). It was amended in October and November 2021, adding sections (a)(1) and (a)(2) for further clarification.

Michael T. Morley, Sheila M. McDevitt Professor of Law at Florida State University College of Law, explained to Reuters, “it appears that, at the time of the 2020 election, nothing in Rule 183-1-12-.13 expressly required election officials themselves to keep either the original electronic ballot images, or an electronic copy of them, after the period for requesting a recount had elapsed to make them available for public inspection.”

He told Reuters the amended rule now “appears to resolve any potential ambiguity or uncertainty about the scope of election officials’ obligation to themselves retain a copy of ballot images.”

This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work  

 

[mark francis]

actually states certified the election results. that's called the "election process", *****. lol

Evidence exists that state officials knowingly certified election results they knew were dishonest. That is what corrupt politicians and individuals do, they lie, cheat, steal, and destroy.

 

[mark francis]

i'm saying, for at least twice, that republican plaintiffs presented no credible evidence of fraud.
what part of that are you too stupid to understand?

again, you think democrats have "total control" in red states?
god you get dumber with every post

There was insufficient evidence to allow any judge in any court to rule emphatically that no voter fraud occurred.

 

[mark francis]

god, its so simple. If voting machines are examined by outside uncertified people, there is no way to validate they haven't been compromised.

that's how we keep elections safe, by "chain of custody". duh

god you're stupid

If insiders committed voter fraud and refuse to allow outsiders to examine the machines used in that fraud, how does that inspire American confidence in the voting process?

 

[Boris Norris]

Evidence exists that state officials knowingly certified election results they knew were dishonest. That is what corrupt politicians and individuals do, they lie, cheat, steal, and destroy.

WELL.WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?
All you do is make outrageous claims and ignorant assumptions but never support ot with facts.

 

[Boris Norris]

Georgia officials claimed machines in Georgia that were examined by non-democrats were damaged somehow.

Ok. You say claimed. Wheres the evidence and why wasn't that presented?

That seems to me to be politically biased and therefore untrustworthy.

biased towards republicans if they were non democrats. Ehats your point now?

Democrats can examine the machines but republicans cannot.

you just contradicted yourself in the first sentence. Are you fully functional?

Why are democrats given exclusive control of American voting machines?

They are not and you are a liar to say they are. The electoral people control them. What is wrong with you? Are you crazy or something.

In spite of the massive number opf problems the machines had in the 2020 democrat primary, the democrat primary of 2022 proved the machines were corrupt, and a hand count examination of the ballots proved the machine had flipped votes

again, wheres the evidence the machines were flipping votes? How did that election prove they were corrupted?

and the election was therefore overturned as a result of the hand-count examination of the votes tabulated by the corrupted machines.

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes” | The Wentworth Report

If that is the case how can you blame the machines and suggest the democrats were corrupting them?

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes”. By Emerald Robinson.

According to the local paper Decaturish: DeKalb County (GA) just released the results of a hand count in the District 2County Commission primary race — and the hand count revealed such massive discrepancies between the May 24th machine results and the June 1 hand count that it has flipped the race! …

The machines did not count 2,810 votes at all — mostly from Election Day ballots. That’s almost 20% of the total votes that mysteriously disappeared …

The machines also counted only 589 votes for the candidate Michelle Long Spears on May 24th and placed her third in the race but the June 1st hand count discovered 3,491 more votes for her. Suddenly, she’s winning the race. …

The real bombshell is why there was a hand count conducted at all in this race. It only happened because the candidate Michelle Long Spears took pictures of the precinct-level results and showed them to the local media site Decaturish and those machine “results” showed that Michelle Long Spears was getting zero votes in her own precinct. In other words: obvious fraud. …

New and corrupt databases created ! Mistakes in the precinct scanners! Thousands of votes not counted! Thousands of votes miscounted for multiple candidates! Hand counts conducted to correct the machine counts!

Guess what folks: it’s called election fraud using the electronic voting machines.

Are you ready for the best part of the story?

It’s a primary race for Democrats.

Paper ballots, hand counted under scrutiny by all interested parties. Until then, US election results are not credible

The first voting machines were introduced in 1960s. Suddenly when Trump gets beaten they are now all corrupt, controlled by democrats
and other mischievous events.
Do you really expect people to believe that??

 

[Boris Norris]

You are misunderstanding what Senator Paul correctly stated. He did not state that courts did not rule that there was insufficient evidence presented to them to justify taking on a voter fraud case. Paul said no judge ruled that voter fraud did not occur. The statements are not the same.

The courts were briefed and judges read necessary documents and declared the cases were wasting courts time.
Thats code for, there is no evidence. They didn't waste their time so there was no evidence. Its a rubbish.

 

[mark francis]

WELL.WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?
All you do is make outrageous claims and ignorant assumptions but never support ot with facts.

Evidence of official knowledge fraud is plentiful.

Caught on Tape: Democratic Election Official Admits, 'There is a Lot of Voter Fraud'

Myth?

townhall.com

In the video, NYC Democratic Commissioner of the Board of Elections Alan Schulkin is caught on hidden camera at a United Federation of Teachers holiday party admitting that there is widespread voter fraud in New York City. “Yeah, they should ask for your ID. I think there is a lot of voter fraud,” said Schulkin, who elaborated on the types of voter fraud that are taking place in New York...“You know, I don’t think it’s too much to ask somebody to show some kind of an ID…Like I say, people don’t realize, certain neighborhoods in particular they bus people around to vote,” said Schulman.

 

[mark francis]

The courts were briefed and judges read necessary documents and declared the cases were wasting courts time.
Thats code for, there is no evidence. They didn't waste their time so there was no evidence. Its a rubbish.

If there was no evidence that fraud was committed then there was no evidence that fraud was not committed. Without extensive investigations that uncovers all the evidence, there will always be insufficient evidence to persuasively show that either fraud was committed or was not committed.

 

[mark francis]

biased towards republicans if they were non democrats. Ehats your point now?

Neither party should have total control over voting machines in national elections.

again, wheres the evidence the machines were flipping votes? How did that election prove they were corrupted?

Besides machines that were caught flipping votes democrats blamed on "glitches," and apart from thousands of votes being flipped from Trump to Biden on live TV on Nov 3, there is this evidence of voting machines flipping votes in 2022:

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes” | The Wentworth Report

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes”. By Emerald Robinson.

According to the local paper Decaturish: DeKalb County (GA) just released the results of a hand count in the District 2County Commission primary race — and the hand count revealed such massive discrepancies between the May 24th machine results and the June 1 hand count that it has flipped the race! …

The machines did not count 2,810 votes at all — mostly from Election Day ballots. That’s almost 20% of the total votes that mysteriously disappeared …

The machines also counted only 589 votes for the candidate Michelle Long Spears on May 24th and placed her third in the race but the June 1st hand count discovered 3,491 more votes for her. Suddenly, she’s winning the race. …

The real bombshell is why there was a hand count conducted at all in this race. It only happened because the candidate Michelle Long Spears took pictures of the precinct-level results and showed them to the local media site Decaturish and those machine “results” showed that Michelle Long Spears was getting zero votes in her own precinct. In other words: obvious fraud. …

New and corrupt databases created ! Mistakes in the precinct scanners! Thousands of votes not counted! Thousands of votes miscounted for multiple candidates! Hand counts conducted to correct the machine counts!

Guess what folks: it’s called election fraud using the electronic voting machines.

Are you ready for the best part of the story?

It’s a primary race for Democrats.

Paper ballots, hand counted under scrutiny by all interested parties. Until then, US election results are not credible.

The first voting machines were introduced in 1960s. Suddenly when Trump gets beaten they are now all corrupt, controlled by democrats
and other mischievous events.
Do you really expect people to believe that??

Voting machine "glitches" involving flipped votes, added ghost votes, and so forth did not surface in America until after voting machines in Venezuela were used by crooks to destroy that nation by fraud. George Soros was a key investor/owner of the voting machines used in the Venezuelan fraud and Soros remains a key factor in Dominion machines used in questionable election results in America for the last decade, particularly since 2016. Here is a history of voting machines connected to George Soros that should not be ignored:

US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud (caracol.com)

US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud​

US Vote Machines Made in Venezuela for Election Fraud made by Smartmatic Inc.

Stop the Ballot Madness! Today’s US electronic vote system, used in Trump v. Biden, including swing states, was originally designed, funded and deployed in communist Venezuela. Co-owned by the Venezuelan government and state-owned Bitza software. CIA reported in first use, Smartmatic falsified an election for dictator Hugo Chavez to stymie a recall. Says NY Times:

“Smartmatic was a little-known firm with no experience in voting technology before it was chosen by the Venezuelan authorities to replace the country’s elections machinery ahead of a contentious referendum that confirmed Mr. Chávez as president in August 2004.”

Does Smartmatic still sabotage elections?

Related:
• UNBELIEVABLE: George Soros Employee Owns Defective Switch-Vote Biden Machines
• SHOCK: US Vote Machines First Used in Communist State to Throw Election by Subterfuge!

Smartmatic: Banana Republicans: So, the first Smartmatic machine was designed to cheat residents in a banana republic to keep a dangerous dictator in power. Smartmatic vote machines are owned and run by Geo Soros’ lieutenant Lord Mark Malloch Brown and Venezuelan computer engineer Antonio Mugica. This company then circled the globe, including America, selling Smartmatic vote systems. But a Filipina Senator wants to know, “how a foreign firm hounded by controversy won the bid to set up the national ID system of Philippines.” See UNBELIEVABLE: George Soros Employee Owns Defective Switch-Vote Biden Machines.

Venezuelan Voting Machine: ANY Times article stated:

“The federal government is investigating takeover last year of a leading American manufacturer of electronic voting systems by a small software company linked to the leftist Venezuelan government of President Hugo Chávez. The inquiry is focusing on the Venezuelan owners of the software company, the Smartmatic Corporation, trying to determine whether the government in Caracas has any control or influence over the firm’s operations.”

Smartmatic Adopted by Tyrantictator Hugo Chavez chose Smartmatic, despite – or perhaps because of – being the company’s first time providing election machines. Smartmatic joined with Venezuelan software company, Bitza. Writes NY Times:
So, given the machine’s origins, purpose, record, and abilities, Is there any chance Smartmatic did not help throw this election?

“Seven months before that voting contract was awarded, a Venezuelan government financing agency invested $200,000+ into a smaller technology company, owned by the same people as Smartmatic, joined with Smartmatic as a minor partner in the bid. In return, the government agency was given a 28% stake in the smaller company and a seat on its board, which was occupied by a senior government official who had previously advised Mr. Chávez on elections technology. “

In 2007, Smartmatic added a million fake votes to another Venezuela election.

CIA Investigates Foreign Vote Fraud: The Smartmatic communist partnership raised red flags. In the actual Venezuela 2004 vote, Chavez faced recall, behind 40% to 60% in polling. Yet, in the election, Chavez squeaked out a 52%-48% win. Wrote McClatchy: “Appearing last month before a U.S. Election Assistance Commission field hearing in Orlando, Fla., a CIA cybersecurity expert suggested that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his allies fixed a 2004 election recount.” Smartmatic is apparently not proud of Venezuela’s 2004 vote, since their history strangely omits this damning info.

CIA: Smartmatic’s FIRST Election Was Rigged: Computer voting expert Steve Stigall responded, telling the Election Assistance Commission that “computerized electoral systems are vulnerable at 5 stages, by altering voter registration lists to posting results.” Stigall added voting equipment connected to the Internet can be hacked, and machines not connected can be hacked wirelessly.” McClatchy observes:

“When Chavez won, Venezuelan mathematicians challenged results that showed him to be consistently strong in parts of the country where he had weak support. The mathematicians found “a very subtle algorithm” that appeared to adjust the vote in Chavez’s favor.”

CONCLUSION: Connect the Dots: The US Smartmatic voting system wasn’t designed in America but in communist Venezuela, first used by Dictator Hugo Chavez, sponsored by his government as co-owner, educated by Bitza state software. A mere 16 years ago. Designed and first deployed to defraud a recall election, claims CIA. Today, Venezuela is a failed nation whose people are trapped in a living hell, dying without food or medicine. This might not have happened if Smartmatic had not willfully cooperated in election fraud. Smartmatic was then deployed to America where it is now in the midst of apparent massive election fraud. So, given the machine’s origins, purpose, record, and abilities – What are the chances that Smartmatic did not help throw this election?

 

[Boris Norris]

Neither party should have total control over voting machines in national elections.

Besides machines that were caught flipping votes democrats blamed on "glitches," and apart from thousands of votes being flipped from Trump to Biden on live TV on Nov 3, there is this evidence of voting machines flipping votes in 2022:

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes” | The Wentworth Report

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes”. By Emerald Robinson.

According to the local paper Decaturish: DeKalb County (GA) just released the results of a hand count in the District 2County Commission primary race — and the hand count revealed such massive discrepancies between the May 24th machine results and the June 1 hand count that it has flipped the race! …

The machines did not count 2,810 votes at all — mostly from Election Day ballots. That’s almost 20% of the total votes that mysteriously disappeared …

The machines also counted only 589 votes for the candidate Michelle Long Spears on May 24th and placed her third in the race but the June 1st hand count discovered 3,491 more votes for her. Suddenly, she’s winning the race. …

The real bombshell is why there was a hand count conducted at all in this race. It only happened because the candidate Michelle Long Spears took pictures of the precinct-level results and showed them to the local media site Decaturish and those machine “results” showed that Michelle Long Spears was getting zero votes in her own precinct. In other words: obvious fraud. …

New and corrupt databases created ! Mistakes in the precinct scanners! Thousands of votes not counted! Thousands of votes miscounted for multiple candidates! Hand counts conducted to correct the machine counts!

Guess what folks: it’s called election fraud using the electronic voting machines.

Are you ready for the best part of the story?

It’s a primary race for Democrats.

Paper ballots, hand counted under scrutiny by all interested parties. Until then, US election results are not credible.



Voting machine "glitches" involving flipped votes, added ghost votes, and so forth did not surface in America until after voting machines in Venezuela were used by crooks to destroy that nation by fraud. George Soros was a key investor/owner of the voting machines used in the Venezuelan fraud and Soros remains a key factor in Dominion machines used in questionable election results in America for the last decade, particularly since 2016. Here is a history of voting machines connected to George Soros that should not be ignored:

US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud (caracol.com)

US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud​

US Vote Machines Made in Venezuela for Election Fraud made by Smartmatic Inc.

Stop the Ballot Madness! Today’s US electronic vote system, used in Trump v. Biden, including swing states, was originally designed, funded and deployed in communist Venezuela. Co-owned by the Venezuelan government and state-owned Bitza software. CIA reported in first use, Smartmatic falsified an election for dictator Hugo Chavez to stymie a recall. Says NY Times:

“Smartmatic was a little-known firm with no experience in voting technology before it was chosen by the Venezuelan authorities to replace the country’s elections machinery ahead of a contentious referendum that confirmed Mr. Chávez as president in August 2004.”

Does Smartmatic still sabotage elections?

Related:
• UNBELIEVABLE: George Soros Employee Owns Defective Switch-Vote Biden Machines
• SHOCK: US Vote Machines First Used in Communist State to Throw Election by Subterfuge!

Smartmatic: Banana Republicans: So, the first Smartmatic machine was designed to cheat residents in a banana republic to keep a dangerous dictator in power. Smartmatic vote machines are owned and run by Geo Soros’ lieutenant Lord Mark Malloch Brown and Venezuelan computer engineer Antonio Mugica. This company then circled the globe, including America, selling Smartmatic vote systems. But a Filipina Senator wants to know, “how a foreign firm hounded by controversy won the bid to set up the national ID system of Philippines.” See UNBELIEVABLE: George Soros Employee Owns Defective Switch-Vote Biden Machines.

Venezuelan Voting Machine: ANY Times article stated:

“The federal government is investigating takeover last year of a leading American manufacturer of electronic voting systems by a small software company linked to the leftist Venezuelan government of President Hugo Chávez. The inquiry is focusing on the Venezuelan owners of the software company, the Smartmatic Corporation, trying to determine whether the government in Caracas has any control or influence over the firm’s operations.”

Smartmatic Adopted by Tyrantictator Hugo Chavez chose Smartmatic, despite – or perhaps because of – being the company’s first time providing election machines. Smartmatic joined with Venezuelan software company, Bitza. Writes NY Times:
So, given the machine’s origins, purpose, record, and abilities, Is there any chance Smartmatic did not help throw this election?

“Seven months before that voting contract was awarded, a Venezuelan government financing agency invested $200,000+ into a smaller technology company, owned by the same people as Smartmatic, joined with Smartmatic as a minor partner in the bid. In return, the government agency was given a 28% stake in the smaller company and a seat on its board, which was occupied by a senior government official who had previously advised Mr. Chávez on elections technology. “

In 2007, Smartmatic added a million fake votes to another Venezuela election.

CIA Investigates Foreign Vote Fraud: The Smartmatic communist partnership raised red flags. In the actual Venezuela 2004 vote, Chavez faced recall, behind 40% to 60% in polling. Yet, in the election, Chavez squeaked out a 52%-48% win. Wrote McClatchy: “Appearing last month before a U.S. Election Assistance Commission field hearing in Orlando, Fla., a CIA cybersecurity expert suggested that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his allies fixed a 2004 election recount.” Smartmatic is apparently not proud of Venezuela’s 2004 vote, since their history strangely omits this damning info.

CIA: Smartmatic’s FIRST Election Was Rigged: Computer voting expert Steve Stigall responded, telling the Election Assistance Commission that “computerized electoral systems are vulnerable at 5 stages, by altering voter registration lists to posting results.” Stigall added voting equipment connected to the Internet can be hacked, and machines not connected can be hacked wirelessly.” McClatchy observes:

“When Chavez won, Venezuelan mathematicians challenged results that showed him to be consistently strong in parts of the country where he had weak support. The mathematicians found “a very subtle algorithm” that appeared to adjust the vote in Chavez’s favor.”

CONCLUSION: Connect the Dots: The US Smartmatic voting system wasn’t designed in America but in communist Venezuela, first used by Dictator Hugo Chavez, sponsored by his government as co-owner, educated by Bitza state software. A mere 16 years ago. Designed and first deployed to defraud a recall election, claims CIA. Today, Venezuela is a failed nation whose people are trapped in a living hell, dying without food or medicine. This might not have happened if Smartmatic had not willfully cooperated in election fraud. Smartmatic was then deployed to America where it is now in the midst of apparent massive election fraud. So, given the machine’s origins, purpose, record, and abilities – What are the chances that Smartmatic did not help throw this election?

Theres one thing you keep avoiding and that is, Biden won and was certified without any detected fraud. So bang on all you like, the party's over son. You.lost.

 

[Boris Norris]

If there was no evidence that fraud was committed then there was no evidence that fraud was not committed.

Nice word play son but it means nothing. There was no evidence of any fraud. You seem to have a problem grasping the principle of no evidence.

Without extensive investigations that uncovers all the evidence, there will always be insufficient evidence to persuasively show that either fraud was committed or was not committed.

The gop conducted their investigation and found nothing. You might be wise to consult them about the predicament they have placed your defence.