mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,684
The corrupted officials claim they debunked the claims of corruption against them, but they lie.
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
Navarro's blistering 36-page report alleging Biden's outright voter fraud
- Thread starter reedak
- Start date
Werbung:
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,684
Officials hastily amended their voter rolls after the election to give the false impression that precincts had not reported more votes than registered voters, even though that is exactly what they had done.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,684
Paper ballots cannot be verified just because they are written on paper. The fact that ballots were written on paper does nothing to solve the crime of illegally missing voting machine logs.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,684
Democrats may be right. As long as the logs remain missing there may never be any proof of fraud.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,684
Try to focus on "the missing logs" rather than "The Epoch Times."
corrupted officials? you can prove they are corrupted? no?
you're getting desperate, son.
what "missing logs"? this report talks about logs all over the place.
maybe ramsland was just too stupid to understand what he saw?
Mr. Ramsland’s central conclusion is that “the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results” (¶B.2). His reasoning is that the system intentionally generates many errors while scanning ballots in order to cause the images of the ballots to be reviewed by an EMS operator, a process known as “adjudication” during which the votes can be manually edited (¶B.12). This provides an opportunity, Mr. Ramsland believes, for a malicious operator to change votes without being detected. Citing his forensic examination, Mr. Ramsland claims that a “staggering number of votes [in Antrim] required adjudication” (¶B.12), and that “all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing” and must “have been manually removed” (¶B.15). There are several problems with this theory. First, adjudication occurs after ballots are scanned and poll tapes are printed. In Antrim County, the final reported results match the poll tapes in essentially all cases. Therefore, the final results could not have been altered using adjudication. Second, Mr. Ramsland mischaracterizes the adjudication process. Dominion’s adjudication system produces detailed logs, which are recorded in the EMS together with the ballot scan and the scanner’s original interpretation, as illustrated in Figure 9. Far from being an ideal way to cheat without possibility of detection, adjudication creates abundant digital evidence.
you mean these "missing" logs?
Third, and fatally, adjudication functionality was not enabled at all in Antrim County during the November 2020 election. The adjudication software application is an optional component of Democracy Suite. Antrim did not purchase it, and my examination of the EMS shows that it was not installed. There are no adjudication logs for the simple reason that adjudication was not used.
Mr. Ramsland makes several further mistakes in interpreting the election system logs. He states that the scanner log shows that “Divert Options” were selected and claims that this means “all write-in ballots were sent for ‘adjudication’ by a poll worker or election official to process the ballot based on voter ‘intent’. Adjudication files allow a computer operator to decide to whom to award those votes (or to trash them)” (¶J.4). In reality, the divert option simply means that when a voter has selected a write-in, the scanner directs the physical ballot into a separate compartment within the ballot box. This makes it more convenient for a worker to later read the name that was written in. All voter selections, including the presence of a write-in, are processed normally by the scanner and reflected on the poll tape. The setting has nothing to do with electronic adjudication.
god, that ramsland is stupid. he can't do anything right
god, that ramsland is stupid. he can't do anything right
Mr. Ramsland also points to scanner log entries that show “Override Options” were enabled for several classes of ballots. He mistakenly claims that these settings “allow[] any operator to change those votes” (¶J.5). “This gives the system operators carte blanche to adjudicate ballots,” he further claims (¶J.6). In actuality, the “Override Options” refer to situations where the scanner warns 42 a voter that they may have made a mistake when marking their ballot, such as an overvote or undervote. If the override option is enabled, voters are allowed to acknowledge the warnings and cause the scanner to accept their ballots despite the error conditions. These settings have nothing to do with “overriding” voters’ selections, and they do not mean the ballots will be sent to adjudication
god that ramsland is stupid. lol
god that ramsland is stupid. lol
Mr. Ramsland further claims that the scanner log shows that “RCV or Ranked Choice Voting Algorithm was enabled” which “allows the user to apply a weighted numerical value to candidates and change the overall result” (¶J.2). In reality, although some log entries reference the voting system’s RCV feature, they do not indicate that it was enabled. The EMS and memory card data data show that RCV was not in use, as do the results of the hand recount of the presidential contest.
god that ramsland is stupid. lol
god that ramsland is stupid. lol
Mr. Ramsland claims that on “November 21, 2020, an unauthorized user unsuccessfully attempted to zero out election results” (¶B.17). The only evidence he offers for this assertion is an EMS log file entry that reads “EmsLogger - There is no permission to {0}”, which he claims “is direct proof of an attempt to tamper with evidence” (¶J.8). This is absurd and misleading. A programmer would immediately recognize that {0} is merely a placeholder, in this case one that was intended to be replaced with a description of the attempted action [26]. It has nothing to do with “zeroing” election results.
god that ramsland is stupid. lol
god that ramsland is stupid. lol
Citing another error message logged to the EMS, “XmlException: The ’ ’ character, hexadecimal value 0x20, cannot be included in a name”, Mr. Ramsland concludes, “Bottom line is that this is a calibration that rejects the vote” (¶J.8). This is completely baseless. The error refers to a field name in a data structure (an XML entity), which the relevant programming standard does not allow to contain a space. It has no relation to the names of contests or candidates, and there is nothing that suggests the error resulted in a rejected vote.
god that ramsland is stupid. lol
god that ramsland is stupid. lol
Mr. Ramsland repeatedly mischaracterizes the updates to the scanner election definitions as “software updates” (¶¶B.9, B.18, D.14–17, E.1). Although sometimes referred to as “ballot programming”, election definitions in the Dominion system are not software in the sense of a computer program but rather data files that specify the content and layout of the ballots
he's such an "expert" he doesn't understand software vs data. lol
he's such an "expert" he doesn't understand software vs data. lol
Werbung:
Elsewhere, Mr. Ramsland seems to confuse ballot definition changes with firmware updates, which do change the scanner’s software (¶D.17). Ballot definitions are necessarily changed before every election, but firmware updates are a relatively rare occurrence that typically requires re-certification of the software under U.S. Election Assistance Commission guidelines. There is no evidence that any firmware updates occurred during the 2020 election cycle in Antrim County.
again, your "expert" doesn't understand firmware vs data. He's dumber than a 5th grader
again, your "expert" doesn't understand firmware vs data. He's dumber than a 5th grader
Similar threads
