Navarro's blistering 36-page report alleging Biden's outright voter fraud

you think anyone is claiming that literally 100% of ballots out of 5 million are legitimate?
everyone recognizes that some (small) number of errors will occur out of MILLIONS of ballots.

name them and quote them.
If one error can occur then more can occur. If a hundred or more duplicate ballots were uncovered in some sort of fraudulent election scheme, how many more got counted without being caught? We need answers, not excuses or denials.
 
Werbung:
If one error can occur then more can occur. If a hundred or more duplicate ballots were uncovered in some sort of fraudulent election scheme, how many more got counted without being caught? We need answers, not excuses or denials.

"if" lol

we have answers. ballots counted 3 times, biden won each time. red state certified biden's win. DOJ, DHS found nothing to investigate. courts found no fraud.
 
"democrat motivated"? in a red state, you mean "republican approved" lol
your obsession with blaming democrats in a red state is most amusing. And stupid.

but the signatures were validated originally.
Not exactly. The US Constitution requires state legislatures to write election laws. The change in Georgia's election law in 2020 was not made by the state legislature but by an agreement between the republican secretary of state and the democrat party in settlement of a court case brought by the democrat party against the state demanding a loosening of the security rules governing procedures for verifying the legitimacy of ballots.
 
Not exactly. The US Constitution requires state legislatures to write election laws. The change in Georgia's election law in 2020 was not made by the state legislature but by an agreement between the republican secretary of state and the democrat party in settlement of a court case brought by the democrat party against the state demanding a loosening of the security rules governing procedures for verifying the legitimacy of ballots.

yes, exactly. republicans control the georgia government. the republican secretary of state made the final decision.

its amusing how you desperately try to give republicans a pass and blame democrats instead. :)
 
If they never existed then why not, since their existence is required by law?
Its the fraudulent ones never existed. Its also required by law that you present them and proof that fraud took place. No republican including you has not presented anything to make a judge listen.

Why can't you grasp the simple notion Trump was beaten democratically? Nothing points to anything other than that.

But here's a bit of irony. This is what you said.

If they never existed then why not, since their existence is required by law?
You can ask yourself the same question about your god. Would his existence be required to prove he exists? But you blindly put your life in the hands of some celestial ghost pray to him but never require evidence. Then mumble and bleat about evidence. Dont make me vomit.
 
yes, exactly. republicans control the georgia government. the republican secretary of state made the final decision.

its amusing how you desperately try to give republicans a pass and blame democrats instead. :)
Just because republicans and democrats bowed to democrat pressures to remove election securities does not make such a violation of the law justified. Democrats used the race card to unjustly and illegally remove election securities that were in place to prevent voter fraud. It does not matter if a minority or special interest group demands that election securities be removed, removing election securities is wrong. The US Constitution stipulates that election laws are to be determined by state legislatures, not by special interests or specially privileged groups.

Democrats use blacks (i.e. the race card) to fight for the elimination of voting security under the guise of "voting rights." That is foolishness but the left seems to be getting away with such wicked corruption of American laws, rights, and freedoms.


Alabama activists press voting rights in U.S. Supreme Court showdown​

By Andrew Chung - 1h ago
React8 Comments|


By Andrew Chung
Alabama activists battle anew for voting rights in major U.S. Supreme Court case
Alabama activists battle anew for voting rights in major U.S. Supreme Court case© Reuters/EVAN MILLIGAN
 

Attachments

  • 1664190690263.webp
    1664190690263.webp
    72 bytes · Views: 0
Just because republicans and democrats bowed to democrat pressures to remove election securities does not make such a violation of the law justified. Democrats used the race card to unjustly and illegally remove election securities that were in place to prevent voter fraud. It does not matter if a minority or special interest group demands that election securities be removed, removing election securities is wrong. The US Constitution stipulates that election laws are to be determined by state legislatures, not by special interests or specially privileged groups.

Democrats use blacks (i.e. the race card) to fight for the elimination of voting security under the guise of "voting rights." That is foolishness but the left seems to be getting away with such wicked corruption of American laws, rights, and freedoms.

Alabama activists press voting rights in U.S. Supreme Court showdown​

By Andrew Chung - 1h ago
React8 Comments|


By Andrew Chung
Alabama activists battle anew for voting rights in major U.S. Supreme Court case
Alabama activists battle anew for voting rights in major U.S. Supreme Court case© Reuters/EVAN MILLIGAN
democrats bowed to democrat pressure too? lol.
do you even read the stupidity you write? maybe not.

your desperation to blame democrats for everything you don't like is pathetic, but amusing!

"wicked corruption"? corruption? who is corrupt? name the name and the crime they committed. lol

you must never get tired of looking like a desperate whiner.
 
Its the fraudulent ones never existed. Its also required by law that you present them and proof that fraud took place. No republican including you has not presented anything to make a judge listen.

Why can't you grasp the simple notion Trump was beaten democratically? Nothing points to anything other than that.

But here's a bit of irony. This is what you said.


You can ask yourself the same question about your god. Would his existence be required to prove he exists? But you blindly put your life in the hands of some celestial ghost pray to him but never require evidence. Then mumble and bleat about evidence. Dont make me vomit.
Its the fraudulent ones never existed. Its also required by law that you present them and proof that fraud took place. No republican including you has not presented anything to make a judge listen.

Why can't you grasp the simple notion Trump was beaten democratically? Nothing points to anything other than that.

But here's a bit of irony. This is what you said.


You can ask yourself the same question about your god. Would his existence be required to prove he exists? But you blindly put your life in the hands of some celestial ghost pray to him but never require evidence. Then mumble and bleat about evidence. Dont make me vomit.
Why are you or others dismissing serious problems in precincts that give rise to allegations of fraud? Why are crucial photo records or logs missing from voting machines when there is no reasonable explanation other than gross incompetence or deliberate fraud? If incompetence then the incompetent official should be held accountable for such a serious breach of security in a national election. If deliberate fraud then the case should have ended up in court.



Crucial Logs Missing From Michigan County Dominion Voting Machines: Forensics Report

By Ivan Pentchoukov

December 14, 2020 Updated: January 26, 2021
biggersmaller
Print
A court-sanctioned forensic audit of voting systems in Michigan’s Antrim County determined that crucial security and ballot-adjudication logs were missing from machines by Dominion Voting Systems, the company at the epicenter of the dispute over whether voter fraud occurred during the 2020 general election.
The findings are part of a preliminary forensic report (pdf) written by Russell Ramsland, a former Reagan White House official who has worked for NASA and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Kevin Elsenheimer, the chief judge of Michigan’s 13th Circuit Court, approved the report for release to the public on Dec. 14.
According to the report, both the ballot-adjudication logs and the security logs for the Nov. 3 general election appear to have been removed; logs for prior elections are still present on the machines.
“The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software,” Ramsland wrote. “We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.”

 
democrats bowed to democrat pressure too? lol.
do you even read the stupidity you write? maybe not.

your desperation to blame democrats for everything you don't like is pathetic, but amusing!

"wicked corruption"? corruption? who is corrupt? name the name and the crime they committed. lol

you must never get tired of looking like a desperate whiner.
Of course democrats bowed to their own pressure as if white democrats were bowing to the supposedly just demands of cruelly oppressed black democrats in America. The truth is democrat leaders have fabricated and inflamed the oppressed black narrative as an excuse to pretend they are being just for bowing to black pressures created by American oppression. The alleged oppressed blacks narrative is just an excuse to take away the rights of all Americans to a fair and free election secured by laws that limit the ability of crooks to commit fraud.
 
Why are you or others dismissing serious problems in precincts that give rise to allegations of fraud? Why are crucial photo records or logs missing from voting machines when there is no reasonable explanation other than gross incompetence or deliberate fraud? If incompetence then the incompetent official should be held accountable for such a serious breach of security in a national election. If deliberate fraud then the case should have ended up in court.



Crucial Logs Missing From Michigan County Dominion Voting Machines: Forensics Report

By Ivan Pentchoukov

December 14, 2020 Updated: January 26, 2021
biggersmaller
Print
A court-sanctioned forensic audit of voting systems in Michigan’s Antrim County determined that crucial security and ballot-adjudication logs were missing from machines by Dominion Voting Systems, the company at the epicenter of the dispute over whether voter fraud occurred during the 2020 general election.
The findings are part of a preliminary forensic report (pdf) written by Russell Ramsland, a former Reagan White House official who has worked for NASA and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Kevin Elsenheimer, the chief judge of Michigan’s 13th Circuit Court, approved the report for release to the public on Dec. 14.
According to the report, both the ballot-adjudication logs and the security logs for the Nov. 3 general election appear to have been removed; logs for prior elections are still present on the machines.
“The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software,” Ramsland wrote. “We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.”

A Dec. 17 audit of ballots cast in Antrim County, Michigan, affirmed the outcome of the presidential election there — refuting viral claims that the election software used by the county, and elsewhere, had facilitated massive fraud.

The audit, conducted by state and local officials and representatives of both political parties, involved a hand tally of all the votes cast for president in the county. The findings verified the county’s outcome, in which President Donald Trump beat President-elect Joe Biden by nearly 3,800 votes. (Biden ultimately beat Trump in the state by more than 154,000 votes.)
 
Behind the dubious report was Russell Ramsland Jr., a Republican who ran for Congress in Texas in 2016 but lost in the primary to Rep. Pete Sessions.

Ramsland — who has in recent years spoken about a purported effort by the “deep state,” including U.S. intelligence agencies, to undermine Trump — is founder of a group called Allied Security Operations Group.

The company’s website doesn’t list its staff and the report doesn’t identify the names or specific credentials of those who helped prepare the report. The group was permitted to access and examine county election equipment as part of a lawsuit filed by a local resident.

the guy knows nothing about elections. lol
 
We reached out to Ramsland and requested an interview, and asked for his response to the Antrim County audit results, but didn’t hear back.

His 23-page report on Antrim claimed that “Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”

But state officials and Dominion — which has been the subject of conspiracy theories following the election — said the report was flawed and spreading misinformation. They noted that the county does not digitally conduct adjudication — when election workers need to review a ballot to determine its intent — as the report alleges. It’s done manually by reviewing the paper ballots.

Several experts on voting systems also told us the report betrayed a misunderstanding of election technology and process, and that it jumped to conclusions to proclaim fraud and make legal judgments.

the guy knows nothing about elections. lol
 
In a rebuttal to the report he submitted to Michigan and federal legislators, Ryan Macias, former acting director of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s Voting System Testing and Certification Program, noted that the ballot definition files (used in the tabulator cards) “are not part of the certified voting system software, are unique to every election, and are regularly updated in advance of the election.”

Macias said the report showed “ASOG has a grave misunderstanding of the DVS DSuite 5.5 voting system, a lack of knowledge of election technology and process, and therefore, has come to a preposterous conclusion.”

Other experts also said the report doesn’t back up its claims that Dominion’s software had been designed to allow election fraud.

“In Antrim County, some elections office staff made an error in data handling… and they caught the mistake, and fixed it,” John Sebes, the co-founder and chief technology officer of the nonpartisan Open Source Elections Technology Institute, said in a phone interview. “That’s making mistakes and catching mistakes, it’s not committing fraud.”

the guy knows nothing about elections. lol
 
One of the specific claims made in the report — which was turned into a Twitter talking point by Trump — was that a “tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020 consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication.”

But that “is based on a lack of understanding of the voting system,” Macias wrote.

Macias told us in a phone interview that the “errors” described in the report are, essentially, entries of alerts from tabulation event logs — and that they don’t mean that something went wrong.

the guy knows nothing about elections. lol
 
Werbung:
Duncan Buell, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of South Carolina, said the report seemed eager to conclude fraud. He said Dominion’s software isn’t perfect, but that isn’t the same as a company creating software to commit fraud.

“When I read this report what I see … is that every time there is a problem referenced in the software, the report instantly jumps to malice and intent,” Buell said.

He said that the existence of the hand-marked, paper ballots allowed for confidence in the results.

“The audit of the human-marked paper is going to be the best record we have of what the voters intended,” he said.

And, as we said, the audit has now affirmed that the systems used didn’t change the outcome.

the guy knows nothing about elections. lol
 
Back
Top