Navarro's blistering 36-page report alleging Biden's outright voter fraud

[mark francis]

again, the paper ballots were recounted BY HAND. let me repeat that..BY HAND. duh.

"sworn depositions' mean nothing for proving anything. People see something and swear that's what they believe? not proof. People make mistakes all the time. lol.

"if the photos were destroyed"? "if"?hahahahhaha "if aliens used mind control rays on us, they might have committed fraud!"

votes were counted THREE TIMES. how many more do you think it should be? lol

Let me repeat. Multiple hand counts of ballot batches that include illegitimate ballots does not expose invalid ballots and does not validate a vote count.

 

[pjmret]

I think you must not be aware of the evidence of large volumes of shredded ballots at some election centers in Georgia. Those ballots were shredded after the count was complete. If those shredded ballots were illegitimate and yet included in the total count and shredded afterward, then the election officials were not only guilty of election fraud but also of destroying evidence of their crime.

post the proof of "large volumes" of "shredded ballots" after the count was complete.

 

[pjmret]

Let me repeat. Multiple hand counts of ballot batches that include illegitimate ballots does not expose invalid ballots and does not validate a vote count.

so let me repeat, prove there were significant numbers of illegitimate ballots.

or else you are back to "i believe something even without evidence because i'm a *****" lol

 

[mark francis]

what "new paper ballots". they saved the originals. duh.

no doubt laws are "violated" every election. do they affect the outcome? certainly not "dozens of ballots'. duh

god you're stupid. lol

Not all original ballots were saved, judging by the photo of large piles of shredded ballots at certain election centers. Furthermore, some duplicated ballots were apparently missed by the election workers after the counting and shredding operation, and they are now secured in a warehouse awaiting the results of a court fight between state officials and organizations seeking to examine the ballots for evidence of legitimacy or illegitimacy.

 

[mark francis]

"may have been". lol.
yes, aliens "may have' cast them from outer space!

do you have any evidence they were invalid? any? post it

The duplicated ballots were clearly fraudulent. I use the term "may have been" as a concession to election officials to give them a chance to explain how the fraudulent ballots got included in the vote count without being detected.

 

[pjmret]

The duplicated ballots were clearly fraudulent. I use the term "may have been" as a concession to election officials to give them a chance to explain how the fraudulent ballots got included in the vote count without being detected.

how is scanning a batch twice "clearly fraudulant" as opposed to a simple mistake?

 

[pjmret]

Not all original ballots were saved, judging by the photo of large piles of shredded ballots at certain election centers. Furthermore, some duplicated ballots were apparently missed by the election workers after the counting and shredding operation, and they are now secured in a warehouse awaiting the results of a court fight between state officials and organizations seeking to examine the ballots for evidence of legitimacy or illegitimacy.

post the credible proof of shredded ballots.

merely repeating your claim twice is the sign of a desperate *****

 

[mark francis]

post the proof of "large volumes" of "shredded ballots" after the count was complete.

I cannot tell you how many ballots were shredded or why. Maybe you can supply evidence that the shredding was minimal and was done for a legitimate reason.

 

[mark francis]

so let me repeat, prove there were significant numbers of illegitimate ballots.

or else you are back to "i believe something even without evidence because i'm a *****" lol

It may be impossible to prove beyond doubt that tens of thousands of illegitimate ballots were counted since the voting machine photos of those ballots are now missing, making it impossible to prove no invalid ballots were cast.

 

[mark francis]

how is scanning a batch twice "clearly fraudulant" as opposed to a simple mistake?

The crime is scanning a single ballot multiple times in the original vote counting process.

 

[pjmret]

I cannot tell you how many ballots were shredded or why. Maybe you can supply evidence that the shredding was minimal and was done for a legitimate reason.

you made the claim, you provide the proof. duh

i'm not aware of any "shredded ballots" so why would you ask me to supply evidence of something I don't think happened at all, was minimal?
hahahahahha

ahhaha

you're so stupid

 

[pjmret]

The crime is scanning a single ballot multiple times in the original vote counting process.

you'll have to prove it was intentional and not a mistake, *****. lol
go for it

 

[pjmret]

It may be impossible to prove beyond doubt that tens of thousands of illegitimate ballots were counted since the voting machine photos of those ballots are now missing, making it impossible to prove no invalid ballots were cast.

of course you can prove it, you have the originals..and they were counted. and could be counted again. or verified again. the missing images actually aren't important in that context. duh.

god you're stupid. lol

 

[pjmret]

so to recap, all we know for sure is:

1. 200 ballots were scanned more than once, there is no evidence it was fraud and not a mistake, and it was corrected.

2. ballot images were not retained by some counties, but he original paper ballots were.

3. the ballots were counted 3 times and each time biden won.

hahahaha
hahahahahha

 

[mark francis]

post the credible proof of shredded ballots.

merely repeating your claim twice is the sign of a desperate *****

Here is one article with one of many photos:

FACT CHECK: Does This Image Show Shredded Ballots In Georgia?

'We have shredded nothing'

checkyourfact.com

DDED BALLOTS IN GEORGIA?​

5:12 PM 01/07/2021 Brad Sylvester | Fact Check Editor

An image shared on Facebook purportedly shows shredded ballots that were found in Georgia during the two Senate runoff elections.

​

Facebook/Screenshot
Verdict: False
The photo shows paper waste produced during the process of opening absentee ballots, not shredded ballots, according to a Fulton County spokesperson. A top official with the Georgia secretary of state’s office has previously refuted claims that ballots in Georgia were being shredded.
Fact Check:
The screen grab of a tweet containing an image of boxes full of shredded paper started circulating amid the two Senate runoff elections in Georgia. The Associated Press called the races for Democratic candidates Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff early Wednesday morning.


“Our team is in Georgia,” reads the screen grabbed tweet from Twitter user @AmyCoello. “They took a little walk. They found shredded ballots in Dell boxes. Police came as well. They wanted to confiscate phones with evidence. Here is just the first few photos.”
In her tweet, Coello does not identify where in Georgia the allegedly shredded ballots were found. She did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment regarding her claim.
Another version of the claim suggests the shredded ballots were found in Fulton County, where Atlanta is located. BBC News, which debunked the allegation that the photo shows shredded ballots, identified the Georgia World Congress Center in Fulton County as the location where the picture was taken.
Fulton County spokesperson Jessica Corbitt-Dominguez told the DCNF in an email that “we have shredded nothing.” (RELATED: Did Georgia’s Fulton County Identify 132,00 ‘Likely Ineligible’ Ballots?)
++++++++++++++++++++++

What do we learn from that article? We learn from official that they shredded nothing, which was clearly not true. But what else? We read from this and other articles defending the shredding that it was envelopes that were shredded, not ballots. Is that true? Maybe, but what does that reveal? If they were shredding envelopes with signatures on them for verification of the legitimacy of the ballots, then all proof of the ballot's legitimacy is lost forever once the envelope is shredded.

This is about signature verifications of ballots:

16 Michigan Schools Get $205,028 for STEM - Tennessee Star

Sixteen Michigan schools have been awarded $205,028 to develop Great Lakes-based science, technology, engineering, and math – STEM – programs.

tennesseestar.com

​

Analysis: A Lack of Signature Verification in Georgia Damages Recount Validity​

November 16, 2020 Admin

by Robert Romano​

Georgia is undertaking a hand recount of ballots cast in the 2020 election in an effort to ensure ballot integrity, but with absentee mail-in ballots already separated from their envelopes, it may be impossible to pull back any votes even if they were cast by ineligible voters.
Why?

Because under state law, a voter’s signature goes on the envelope containing the secret ballot, not the ballot itself. As a result, even if a number of voters are found to have cast votes that were ineligible, there will not be an easy way to remedy the damage that was caused.
Making matters worse, the state of Georgia arbitrarily changed state law on signature verification of absentee ballots via a March 2020 judicial consent decree with Georgia Democrats — without ever going to the state legislature. It changed the statutory requirement that the signature must match the signature on the voter registration card to simply matching the signature on the absentee ballot application.
State law says the signature must match either the voter registration card or the most recent updated registration card and the absentee ballot application, “The registrar or clerk shall then compare the identifying information on the oath with the information on file in his or her office, shall compare the signature or mark on the oath with the signature or mark on the absentee elector’s voter registration card or the most recent update to such absentee elector’s voter registration card and application for absentee ballot or a facsimile of said signature or mark taken from said card or application…”