Massachussetts Senate Seat

This is so fantastic!

I just saw 4 new polls

In one of them they are neck and neck
in the second brown is up by 5
in another brown is up by 7
and in another brown is up by 10

If we can keep moveon.org and accorn out of the picture and put a stop to dead democrats voting........... I smell victory for America !!!!!!!
 
Werbung:
This election could be an indication of a landslide for the Rs in November.

The Rs won 54 House seats in 1994. 2010 could be as big or bigger. The Rs need only 40 seats to take over.

Problem is if they continue their progressive ways, we still lose. Hopefully the Rs have listened to the American people and will follow conservative policies.
 
This election could be an indication of a landslide for the Rs in November.

The Rs won 54 House seats in 1994. 2010 could be as big or bigger. The Rs need only 40 seats to take over.

Problem is if they continue their progressive ways, we still lose. Hopefully the Rs have listened to the American people and will follow conservative policies.

Question!! , When BROWN WINS his Senate seat in Massachussetts on Tuesday, Will MASS. remain in the UNION??
Will BARNEY FRANK go to jail? Will Fannir Mae and Freddy Mac go UNDERGROUND?Will Obama sell Government Motors and run to China?
Will the POPE locate to Boston?
CAN OBAMA REDUCE HIS TERM TO TIME SERVED??
We will know more on Tuesday!! GREAT SCOTT!!!
 
Question!! , When BROWN WINS his Senate seat in Massachussetts on Tuesday, Will MASS. remain in the UNION??
Will BARNEY FRANK go to jail? Will Fannir Mae and Freddy Mac go UNDERGROUND?Will Obama sell Government Motors and run to China?
Will the POPE locate to Boston?
CAN OBAMA REDUCE HIS TERM TO TIME SERVED??
We will know more on Tuesday!! GREAT SCOTT!!!

LOL....Barney Frank in jail..hahaha...he might like that...
 
I don't think Obama helped the lady by going to Mass.
Coakley's poll numbers continued dropping right afterwards.

mass3.png
 
BO went to NJ and VA too and those Dems lost. So, his track record is not good.

But, the Dems intend to vote early and often tomorrow.

And if they still lose, they will figure out a way to prevent his seating in the Senate for as long as possible.

Can you say banana republic?
 
This election could be an indication of a landslide for the Rs in November.

The Rs won 54 House seats in 1994. 2010 could be as big or bigger. The Rs need only 40 seats to take over.

Problem is if they continue their progressive ways, we still lose. Hopefully the Rs have listened to the American people and will follow conservative policies.

Father had a saying: "don't count those chickens before they've hatched"...you seem to place a lot of value on some staunch republicans that couldn't even turn out to vote in 2008 and now you THINK that they'll man-up and become more then they were last NOVEMBER :confused:

Oh, you 'POLLY-ANNA' thinking human...I just love your GOSH-DARN-OPTIMISM...it just sounds sooooo CUTE :cool:
 
Father had a saying: "don't count those chickens before they've hatched"...you seem to place a lot of value on some staunch republicans that couldn't even turn out to vote in 2008 and now you THINK that they'll man-up and become more then they were last NOVEMBER :confused:

Oh, you 'POLLY-ANNA' thinking human...I just love your GOSH-DARN-OPTIMISM...it just sounds sooooo CUTE :cool:

What planet are you on? Ops, the Land of Oz. I forgot.

PLC1, she called me a POLLY-ANNA...you better warn her about name calling.

Independents are nearly always Liberals, but they refuse to admit it.

Mass is a good example of this. That state has a huge number of independent voters, yet their entire congressional delegation is Dem. Most of their state offices are held by Dems, they have not elected a R sentator since 1972.

Yep, independents are liberal Dems, but too delusional to understand who they really are.
 
Father had a saying: "don't count those chickens before they've hatched"...you seem to place a lot of value on some staunch republicans that couldn't even turn out to vote in 2008 and now you THINK that they'll man-up and become more then they were last NOVEMBER :confused:

Oh, you 'POLLY-ANNA' thinking human...I just love your GOSH-DARN-OPTIMISM...it just sounds sooooo CUTE :cool:

The number of Republicans in MA is so small it will not really matter if they show up or not. It is the independents that need to lean Republican this go around to have any chance. It seems that independents are trending away from Obama all over the country.
 
The number of Republicans in MA is so small it will not really matter if they show up or not. It is the independents that need to lean Republican this go around to have any chance. It seems that independents are trending away from Obama all over the country.
True-True...but if we all are relying on those 'MISTIC POLLS' and those very same POLLS said that Coakley was ahead 2 months ago by a margin of 15% and now this slide into the gutter...could it be, just possibly that the polls don't KNOW and as the polls were so horribly wrong {just ask Hillary during the primaries} the polls could be just as off this time too! That's counting your chickens before they've hatched ;)

Gipper Said: Problem is if they continue their progressive ways, we still lose. Hopefully the Rs have listened to the American people and will follow conservative policies.
Could it be that the younger-newer improved republican base is done with all of that 'OLD GOP' hard-lined conservative policy...that more of them are leaning into the center and aren't going to just keep the status quo moving forward because your generations wants to march to that old tired drum beat:confused:
 
True-True...but if we all are relying on those 'MISTIC POLLS' and those very same POLLS said that Coakley was ahead 2 months ago by a margin of 15% and now this slide into the gutter...could it be, just possibly that the polls don't KNOW and as the polls were so horribly wrong {just ask Hillary during the primaries} the polls could be just as off this time too! That's counting your chickens before they've hatched ;)

The trend in all the polls has been going towards Brown. No one is holding up one poll and saying "oh Brown will win it." The trend in almost every poll is going his way, and that is a good indicator that at the very least Coackley is losing ground.

Could it be that the younger-newer improved republican base is done with all of that 'OLD GOP' hard-lined conservative policy...that more of them are leaning into the center and aren't going to just keep the status quo moving forward because your generations wants to march to that old tired drum beat:confused:

I think attempting to base such a claim on the outcome of a race in MA is short-sighted. The Republican base in MA will obviously differ from the Republican base in a place like TX. I do not think you could make such a claim until after the 2010 election when you have a national sample to work with.
 
Originally Posted by Gipper This election could be an indication of a landslide for the Rs in November.
The Rs won 54 House seats in 1994. 2010 could be as big or bigger. The Rs need only 40 seats to take over.

Problem is if they continue their progressive ways, we still lose. Hopefully the Rs have listened to the American people and will follow conservative policies.
Fully understand your point BIGROB and this was the post of GIPPER's that I was replying too...it appears that he's taking a 'hopeful' win in MA and running it clear across AMERICA
 
It's over for the Democrats, with their 60 vote majority, when Scott Brown defeats Martha Coakley, with a huge win. She's just a puppet for Obama & Reid, she can't think for herself & she thought it was hers, without a fight. Brown will give the Republicans the big victory & President Obama, as well as the rest of the Democrats, will cool down with their agenda.
 
hmmmmm..

There's something fishy going on with these polls. A nine point lead? Really? Overnight just like that? What, did they go to the local chapter of young republicans to get their "citizen's survey"?

Like I've always said about polls, they hope to mislead the herd in the most relied-upon GOP trick since the dawn of time: make the herd think the trend is in a given direction and the more apathetic ones will just hang their head and follow along.

9 out of 10 citizens [polled at the tavern] think the drinking age should be lowered..

"wow, I didn't know that many people were in favor of lowering the drinking age! Maybe we should?"..

And so on...
:rolleyes:
 
Werbung:
hmmmmm..

There's something fishy going on with these polls. A nine point lead? Really? Overnight just like that? What, did they go to the local chapter of young republicans to get their "citizen's survey"?

Like I've always said about polls, they hope to mislead the herd in the most relied-upon GOP trick since the dawn of time: make the herd think the trend is in a given direction and the more apathetic ones will just hang their head and follow along.

9 out of 10 citizens [polled at the tavern] think the drinking age should be lowered..

"wow, I didn't know that many people were in favor of lowering the drinking age! Maybe we should?"..

And so on...
:rolleyes:



The first poll showing a Brown lead was one done for the dems.
 
Back
Top