Ma Nature vs. The Least Educated

mark francis said:

There Is No Climate Emergency, Say 500 Experts in Letter to the United Nations​

By Mark J. Perry
Carpe Diem
October 01, 2019

The video above is from Friends of Science, a Canada-based “non-profit organization run by dedicated volunteers comprised mainly of active and retired earth and atmospheric scientists, engineers, and other professionals.” On the same day last week that Greta Thunberg made an impassioned speech to the United Nations about her fears of a climate emergency, a group of 500 prominent scientists and professionals, led by the CLINTEL co-founder Guus Berkhout, sent this registered letter to the United Nations Secretary-General stating that there is no climate emergency and climate policies should be designed to benefit the lives of people. Here’s the press release, here’ the list of 500 signees, and here’s the opening of the letter:
Click to expand...

Consensus of experts​

The United States' foremost scientific agencies and organizations have recognized global warming as a human-caused problem that should be addressed. The U.S. Global Change Research Program has published a series of scientific reports documenting the causes and impacts of global climate change. NOAA, NASA, the National Science Foundation, the National Research Council, and the Environmental Protection Agency have all published reports and fact sheets stating that Earth is warming mainly due to the increase in human-produced heat-trapping gases.

On their climate home page, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicines says, "Scientists have known for some time, from multiple lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth’s climate, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions," and that "Climate change is increasingly affecting people’s lives."

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) issued this position statement: "Scientific evidence indicates that the leading cause of climate change in the most recent half century is the anthropogenic increase in the concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, tropospheric ozone, and nitrous oxide." (Adopted April 15, 2019)

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) issued this position statement: "Human activities are changing Earth's climate, causing increasingly disruptive societal and ecological impacts. Such impacts are creating hardships and suffering now, and they will continue to do so into the future—in ways expected as well as potentially unforeseen. To limit these impacts, the world's nations have agreed to hold the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C (3.6°F) above pre-industrial levels. To achieve this goal, global society must promptly reduce its greenhouse gas emissions." (Reaffirmed in November 2019)
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:

There Is No Climate Emergency, Say 500 Experts in Letter to the United Nations​

By Mark J. Perry
Carpe Diem
October 01, 2019

The video above is from Friends of Science, a Canada-based “non-profit organization run by dedicated volunteers comprised mainly of active and retired earth and atmospheric scientists, engineers, and other professionals.” On the same day last week that Greta Thunberg made an impassioned speech to the United Nations about her fears of a climate emergency, a group of 500 prominent scientists and professionals, led by the CLINTEL co-founder Guus Berkhout, sent this registered letter to the United Nations Secretary-General stating that there is no climate emergency and climate policies should be designed to benefit the lives of people. Here’s the press release, here’ the list of 500 signees, and here’s the opening of the letter:
Click to expand...

Consensus of evidence​

These scientific organizations have not issued statements in a void; they echo the findings of individual papers published in refereed scientific journals. The Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) maintains a database of over 8,500 peer-reviewed science journals, and multiple studies of this database show evidence of overwhelming agreement among climate scientists. In 2004, science historian Naomi Oreskes published the results of her examination of the ISI database in the journal Science. She reviewed 928 abstracts published between 1993 and 2003 related to human activities warming the Earth's surface, and stated, "Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position."

This finding hasn't changed with time. In 2016, a review paper summarized the results of several independent studies on peer-reviewed research related to climate. The authors found results consistent with a 97-percent consensus that human activity is causing climate change. A 2021 paper found a greater than 99-percent consensus.

Probably the most definitive assessments of global climate science come from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Founded by the United Nations in 1988, the IPCC releases periodic reports, and each major release includes three volumes: one on the science, one on impacts, and one on mitigation. Each volume is authored by a separate team of experts, who reviews, evaluates, and summarizes relevant research published since the prior report. Each IPCC report undergoes several iterations of expert and government review. The 2021 IPCC report, for instance, received and responded to more than 78,000 expert and government review comments.
 
mark francis said:

There Is No Climate Emergency, Say 500 Experts in Letter to the United Nations​

By Mark J. Perry
Carpe Diem
October 01, 2019

The video above is from Friends of Science, a Canada-based “non-profit organization run by dedicated volunteers comprised mainly of active and retired earth and atmospheric scientists, engineers, and other professionals.” On the same day last week that Greta Thunberg made an impassioned speech to the United Nations about her fears of a climate emergency, a group of 500 prominent scientists and professionals, led by the CLINTEL co-founder Guus Berkhout, sent this registered letter to the United Nations Secretary-General stating that there is no climate emergency and climate policies should be designed to benefit the lives of people. Here’s the press release, here’ the list of 500 signees, and here’s the opening of the letter:
Click to expand...
The article gives the impression that these 500 signatories are scientists or experts in the field of climate science, but in reality very few have any research experience related to climate change. Most of the signers are engineers, business professionals, or study non-climate topics in other academic fields: signatories in unrelated fields such as philosophy, medicine, and law together outnumbered climate scientists approximately six to one. Many are associated with advocacy groups that oppose the conclusions of climate science, like the Heartland Institute.


Lol typical right wing misleading bs

You morons are so predictable
 
"Under a blue sky, in a former cornfield on the outskirts of San Antonio, a group of local and state officials once gathered to inaugurate the state’s first large-scale solar farm. “I can promise you it won’t be the last,” Senator John Cornyn declared. It was an epic understatement.

That installation, the Blue Wing Solar Project, can generate about 14 megawatts. Thirteen years later, there are about 12,600 megawatts worth of solar farms available on the state’s main power grid. That’s enough to keep the air conditioning cooling more than 2.5 million Texan homes. The amount of available solar energy has nearly tripled in the past three years, and there are thousands more megawatts worth of solar projects in various stages of development.

On Wednesday, in the critical afternoon hours, as temperatures in all of the major metros neared or reached triple digits, solar generated about 12 percent of the state’s power needs. This was about the same as coal, though well behind wind (25 percent) and natural gas (43 percent.) Texas is and remains a state dependent on fossil fuels, but, more and more, the lone star in our solar system is energizing the Lone Star State."
.
good-afternoon-smiley-emoticon[1].gif
.​
 
pjmret said:

Consensus of experts​

The United States' foremost scientific agencies and organizations have recognized global warming as a human-caused problem that should be addressed. The U.S. Global Change Research Program has published a series of scientific reports documenting the causes and impacts of global climate change. NOAA, NASA, the National Science Foundation, the National Research Council, and the Environmental Protection Agency have all published reports and fact sheets stating that Earth is warming mainly due to the increase in human-produced heat-trapping gases.

On their climate home page, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicines says, "Scientists have known for some time, from multiple lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth’s climate, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions," and that "Climate change is increasingly affecting people’s lives."

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) issued this position statement: "Scientific evidence indicates that the leading cause of climate change in the most recent half century is the anthropogenic increase in the concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, tropospheric ozone, and nitrous oxide." (Adopted April 15, 2019)

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) issued this position statement: "Human activities are changing Earth's climate, causing increasingly disruptive societal and ecological impacts. Such impacts are creating hardships and suffering now, and they will continue to do so into the future—in ways expected as well as potentially unforeseen. To limit these impacts, the world's nations have agreed to hold the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C (3.6°F) above pre-industrial levels. To achieve this goal, global society must promptly reduce its greenhouse gas emissions." (Reaffirmed in November 2019)
Click to expand...
Too many scientists are under pressure to propagate the erroneous secular mob narrative for fear of losing their jobs, standing, respect, or whatever, regardless of what the science actually dictates.
 
pjmret said:

Consensus of evidence​

These scientific organizations have not issued statements in a void; they echo the findings of individual papers published in refereed scientific journals. The Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) maintains a database of over 8,500 peer-reviewed science journals, and multiple studies of this database show evidence of overwhelming agreement among climate scientists. In 2004, science historian Naomi Oreskes published the results of her examination of the ISI database in the journal Science. She reviewed 928 abstracts published between 1993 and 2003 related to human activities warming the Earth's surface, and stated, "Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position."

This finding hasn't changed with time. In 2016, a review paper summarized the results of several independent studies on peer-reviewed research related to climate. The authors found results consistent with a 97-percent consensus that human activity is causing climate change. A 2021 paper found a greater than 99-percent consensus.

Probably the most definitive assessments of global climate science come from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Founded by the United Nations in 1988, the IPCC releases periodic reports, and each major release includes three volumes: one on the science, one on impacts, and one on mitigation. Each volume is authored by a separate team of experts, who reviews, evaluates, and summarizes relevant research published since the prior report. Each IPCC report undergoes several iterations of expert and government review. The 2021 IPCC report, for instance, received and responded to more than 78,000 expert and government review comments.
Click to expand...
50 something morons bought into and repeated the Hunter Biden false narrative invented by defenders of the Biden crime family. Now all 50 of those morons have egg on their faces for colluding with the corrupt mob to propagate lies. A large percentage of scientists are the same way. If they believe their wealth and positions are dependent on propagating lies than that is what they will do.
 
mark francis said:
Too many scientists are under pressure to propagate the erroneous secular mob narrative for fear of losing their jobs, standing, respect, or whatever, regardless of what the science actually dictates.
Click to expand...
More of your vague conspiracy and such bs

All you do is lie and whine with no proof lol
 
pjmret said:
The article gives the impression that these 500 signatories are scientists or experts in the field of climate science, but in reality very few have any research experience related to climate change. Most of the signers are engineers, business professionals, or study non-climate topics in other academic fields: signatories in unrelated fields such as philosophy, medicine, and law together outnumbered climate scientists approximately six to one. Many are associated with advocacy groups that oppose the conclusions of climate science, like the Heartland Institute.


Lol typical right wing misleading bs

You morons are so predictable
Click to expand...
Here is another ***** who has no experience in atmospheric science:

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/sen-kerry-predicts-ice-free-arctic-5-or-10-years
Sen. Kerry Predicts ‘Ice-Free Arctic' In '5 or 10 Years’
PENNY STARR | JULY 22, 2010 | 7:36PM EDT

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) told supporters of his climate change legislation on Thursday that if the bill does not pass catastrophic events will unfold around the world, including an ice free Arctic sea in 5 to 10 years. (CNSNews.com/Penny Starr)​

(CNSNews.com) – Speaking at a town hall-style meeting promoting climate change legislation on Thursday, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) predicted there will be “an ice-free Arctic” in "five or 10 years."

“The arctic ice is disappearing faster than was predicted,” Kerry said. “And instead of waiting until 2030 or whenever it was to have an ice-free Arctic, we’re going to have one in five or 10 years.”
 
mark francis said:
Here is another ***** who has no experience in atmospheric science:

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/sen-kerry-predicts-ice-free-arctic-5-or-10-years
Sen. Kerry Predicts ‘Ice-Free Arctic' In '5 or 10 Years’
PENNY STARR | JULY 22, 2010 | 7:36PM EDT

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) told supporters of his climate change legislation on Thursday that if the bill does not pass catastrophic events will unfold around the world, including an ice free Arctic sea in 5 to 10 years. (CNSNews.com/Penny Starr)​

(CNSNews.com) – Speaking at a town hall-style meeting promoting climate change legislation on Thursday, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) predicted there will be “an ice-free Arctic” in "five or 10 years."

“The arctic ice is disappearing faster than was predicted,” Kerry said. “And instead of waiting until 2030 or whenever it was to have an ice-free Arctic, we’re going to have one in five or 10 years.”
Click to expand...
Yawn lol

You are a ***** mak8ng stupid claims about science
 
mark francis said:
NJ4Qx[2].webpI'm not a famous scientist propagating preposterous assumptions and predictions about the weather.

View attachment 5098
​
Click to expand...
.​
"Paul Ralph Ehrlich is an American biologist best known for his pessimistic—and wildly inaccurate predictions and warnings about the consequences of population growth and limited resources.

Ehrlich became well known for the controversial 1968 book The Population Bomb which he co-authored with his wife, Anne H. Ehrlich, in which they famously—and erroneously—stated that "in the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now." Among the solutions suggested in that book was population control, including "various forms of coercion" such as eliminating "tax benefits for having additional children," to be used if voluntary methods were to fail, as well as letting "hopeless" countries like India starve to death. Highlighting Ehrlich's failed predictions, American journalist Jonathan V. Last has called The Population Bomb "one of the most spectacularly foolish books ever published".
.
laughing-smiley-face[1].gif
.​
 
Werbung:
pjmret said:
Yes you are a science ***** mak8ng scientific claims lol
Click to expand...
There is nothing scientific about trained scientists making ridiculous claims.

Climate scientists told to 'cover up' the fact that the Earth's temperature hasn't risen for the last 15 years | Daily Mail Online

World's top climate scientists told to 'cover up' the fact that the Earth's temperature hasn't risen for the last 15 years

  • Leaked United Nations report reveals the world's temperature hasn't risen for the last 15 years
  • Politicians have raised concerns about the final draft
  • Fears that the findings will encourage deniers of man-made climate change
By TAMARA COHEN, POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT
PUBLISHED: 15:40 EDT, 19 September 2013 | UPDATED: 02:47 EDT, 20 September 2013
 

Similar threads

Phoenix68
Putin / BIG OIL vs. MA NATURE!!!!!
Replies
0
Views
390
Phoenix68
Phoenix68
GBFan
Sobering Numbers
Replies
14
Views
2K
Boris Norris
B
Stalin
Climate myths: The 'hockey stick' graph has been proven wrong
Replies
0
Views
1K
Stalin
Stalin
I
Racism Vs Underachievement
Replies
2
Views
1K
Phoenix68
Phoenix68
ilikeboobs
US not long for this world
2
Replies
24
Views
2K
mark francis
M
Back
Top