Ma Nature vs. The Least Educated

Data was collected ***** lol
Exactly. The data was fist interpreted to indicate to researchers that we were facing dangerous cooling trends. The same data later led researchers to conclude we are facing dangerous warming trends, proving the researcher have big problems among themselves on how to interpret the same data.
 
Werbung:
Exactly. The data was fist interpreted to indicate to researchers that we were facing dangerous cooling trends. The same data later led researchers to conclude we are facing dangerous warming trends, proving the researcher have big problems among themselves on how to interpret the same data.
Not as a consensus ***** duh
You are stupid lol
 
Exactly. The data was fist interpreted to indicate to researchers that we were facing dangerous cooling trends. The same data later led researchers to conclude we are facing dangerous warming trends, proving the researcher have big problems among themselves on how to interpret the same data.
No there was no consensus in the 70s *****
Now there is.. global warming
 
Not as a consensus ***** duh
You are stupid lol
You are right, there is no consensus opinion about global warming or cooling among research scientists.

'97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong (forbes.com)

'97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong

Alex Epstein
Jan 6, 2015,02:12pm EST

If you've ever expressed the least bit of skepticism about environmentalist calls for making the vast majority of fossil fuel use illegal, you've probably heard the smug response: “97% of climate scientists agree with climate change” — which always carries the implication: Who are you to challenge them?

The answer is: you are a thinking, independent individual--and you don’t go by polls, let alone second-hand accounts of polls; you go by facts, logic and explanation.
 
You are right, there is no consensus opinion about global warming or cooling among research scientists.

'97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong (forbes.com)

'97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong

Alex Epstein
Jan 6, 2015,02:12pm EST

If you've ever expressed the least bit of skepticism about environmentalist calls for making the vast majority of fossil fuel use illegal, you've probably heard the smug response: “97% of climate scientists agree with climate change” — which always carries the implication: Who are you to challenge them?

The answer is: you are a thinking, independent individual--and you don’t go by polls, let alone second-hand accounts of polls; you go by facts, logic and explanation.
Which doesn't disprove global warming ***** lol
 
"Under a blue sky, in a former cornfield on the outskirts of San Antonio, a group of local and state officials once gathered to inaugurate the state’s first large-scale solar farm. “I can promise you it won’t be the last,” Senator John Cornyn declared. It was an epic understatement.

That installation, the Blue Wing Solar Project, can generate about 14 megawatts.
Thirteen years later, there are about 12,600 megawatts worth of solar farms available on the states main power grid. That’s enough to keep the air conditioning cooling more than 2.5 million Texan homes. The amount of available solar energy has nearly tripled in the past three years, and there are thousands more megawatts worth of solar projects in various stages of development.

On Wednesday, in the critical afternoon hours, as temperatures in all of the major metros neared or reached triple digits,
solar generated about 12 percent of the state’s power needs. This was about the same as coal, though well behind wind (25 percent) and natural gas (43 percent.) Texas is and remains a state dependent on fossil fuels, but, more and more, the lone star in our solar system is energizing the Lone Star State."

.
sunny-smiley-emoticon[3].gif
.
.
Bumpc_s-2[1].gif
.
.
 
.
COME ON DOWN, TO MEDIUM-WELL TEXAS!!!
.
big-headache-smiley-emoticon[1].gif
.
.
View attachment 5156Radical leftist Democrats hate God Bless America and godly American patriots.
.
June 30, 2023
.
“Too much rain or too much heat is what makes these types of places functional for everyone,” Herron said. “So it’s fabulous to have the tunnel, it allows them to communicate between buildings, for the food, for the gifts, for anything they need, because if you go through the tunnels, you have anything you need.”
.
morlockada-morlock[1].gif
.
 
Werbung:
The ones you are too stupid to identify? Lol

You are a science *****
Climate change is an obvious myth – how much more evidence do you need? | Climate crisis | The Guardian

There’s no such thing as climate change, Northampton has always looked like this. Photograph: Alamy

Climate change is an obvious myth – how much more evidence do you need?

Many people just refuse to accept the facts that surround them, even if we saw 100 more years of it plain and apparent

Dean Burnett
@garwboy
Tue 25 Nov 2014 04.17 EST

Climate change is a myth. We all know this, deep down. Some of you reading this may have been taken in by the fear-mongering governments or corrupt scientists so have been brainwashed into thinking climate change is a real thing that “threatens all of humanity” or some other nonsense, but it’s just that: nonsense. When you look closely at it, the so-called evidence for climate change, or “global warming” or “warmageddon” or “planetary death spiral” or whatever they’re calling it these days, it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
 
Back
Top