LOCK HIM UP!! LOCK HIM UP!! LOCK HIM UP!!

[pjmret]

An election worker noticed the pristine identical ballots in November 2020.

Nov 17, 2020

• Suzi Voyles, a veteran Fulton poll manager who audited the Nov. 14 recount at Georgia World Congress Center, testified she examined several stacks of ballots of about 100 ballots each from a cardboard box marked “Box No. 5 — Absentee — Batch Numbers 28-36.” She said these ballots “came from the ballot [drop] boxes that had been placed throughout Fulton County.”

Suzi Voyles, poll manager: "One batch stood out. It was pristine."

“Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious use,” she wrote in her Nov. 17 affidavit. "However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a difference in the texture of the paper,” and these mail-in ballots hadn’t been folded even though they ostensibly had been removed from envelopes.

All but three of the 110 ballots in the bundle — which had been labeled “State Farm Arena” — were marked for Biden and appeared to be “identical ballots."

The most “alarming peculiarity” was the identically marked ovals next to Biden’s name. In every ballot, “The bubble next to ‘Joseph R. Biden’ had a slight white eclipse in the bubble,” she said, leading her to believe that the batch of 107 Biden ballots had been “copied" from a single ballot.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Judge Amero orders suspicious pristine ballots sealed – 4-15-21
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Report from June 2021
Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed | RealClearInvestigations,
“We have what is almost surely major absentee-ballot fraud in Fulton County involving 10,000 to 20,000 probably false ballots,” said Garland Favorito, the lead petitioner in the case and a certified poll watcher who runs VoterGa.org, one of the leading advocates for election integrity in the state.

He said the suspect ballots remain in the custody of the election officials and inaccessible from public view.

“We have confirmed that there are five pallets of shrink-wrapped ballots in a county warehouse,” Favorito said in an interview with RealClearInvestigations.

He and other petitioners were ordered to meet at the warehouse May 28 to settle the terms of the inspection of the absentee ballots. But the day before the scheduled meeting, the county filed a flurry of motions to dismiss the case, delaying the inspection indefinitely.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Meeting to discuss concerns about ballots cancelled after motion to dismiss on various technicalities filed in court by courts and officials - 5-25-21
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Possible fake ballots counted among unsealed ballots – Judge Amero postpones audit to consider motions by state officials to dismiss the case – 6-8-21
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Duplicated ballots claim by eyewitnesses, Judge Amero orders shrink-wrapped ballots in warehouse unsealed – 6-8-21
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Judge Amero dismisses voter fraud lawsuit on technical grounds without addressing the issue of duplicated ballots – 7-27-21

State election investigators couldn’t find any fraudulent or counterfeit ballots within ballot batches cited by Republican vote-counters who participated in a statewide audit in November, according to a court filing Tuesday on behalf of Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.



There was no indication of “pristine” ballots with perfectly filled-in ovals and no creases, as alleged in the lawsuit. All ballots in those batches appeared to be authentic.


you morons need better "proof" lol

 

[Phoenix68]

An election worker noticed the pristine identical ballots in November 2020.

Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed | The Epoch Times

Nov 17, 2020

• Suzi Voyles, a veteran Fulton poll manager who audited the Nov. 14 recount at Georgia World Congress Center, testified she examined several stacks of ballots of about 100 ballots each from a cardboard box marked “Box No. 5 — Absentee — Batch Numbers 28-36.” She said these ballots “came from the ballot [drop] boxes that had been placed throughout Fulton County.”

Suzi Voyles, poll manager: "One batch stood out. It was pristine."

“Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious use,” she wrote in her Nov. 17 affidavit. "However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a difference in the texture of the paper,” and these mail-in ballots hadn’t been folded even though they ostensibly had been removed from envelopes.

All but three of the 110 ballots in the bundle — which had been labeled “State Farm Arena” — were marked for Biden and appeared to be “identical ballots."

.

.
"EPOCH TIMES!!!!!"
.
.​

 

[Boris Norris]

Lawyers with the state attorney general’s office on Tuesday filed a response brief on behalf of the secretary of state that details investigative steps taken in response to the claims. Investigators interviewed witnesses and examined about 1,000 absentee ballots and ballot images. They did not uncover any ballots matching those described by the people who swore affidavits or that otherwise appeared to be fraudulent or counterfeit, the brief says.

As per usual, it was a stitch up by a republican nutter.

The people who submitted affidavits said they saw absentee ballots that looked as if they had been marked by machine rather than by hand and had not been creased as they would have been to fit in an envelope.

The secretary of state’s brief says investigators examined the ballots in the batches and box identified by one person who participated in the hand count, but all had been creased and none appeared to have been marked by a computer. The woman then told investigators she may have been mistaken.

"May have been mistaken".
Did you miss that but?

and gave them another box number, but investigators determined that the box-batch combination she cited didn’t exist.

Well well. Nothing you have posted proves anything. You are so using unverifiable nonsense as evidence.

Other hand count participants told investigators they also had seen suspicious-looking ballots, but they had not noted the box or batch numbers.

Everyone goes silent when the spooks arrive to do an investigation. You're not looking good *****.

so...nothing again. lol

 

[mark francis]

Lawyers with the state attorney general’s office on Tuesday filed a response brief on behalf of the secretary of state that details investigative steps taken in response to the claims. Investigators interviewed witnesses and examined about 1,000 absentee ballots and ballot images. They did not uncover any ballots matching those described by the people who swore affidavits or that otherwise appeared to be fraudulent or counterfeit, the brief says.

The people who submitted affidavits said they saw absentee ballots that looked as if they had been marked by machine rather than by hand and had not been creased as they would have been to fit in an envelope.

The secretary of state’s brief says investigators examined the ballots in the batches and box identified by one person who participated in the hand count, but all had been creased and none appeared to have been marked by a computer. The woman then told investigators she may have been mistaken and gave them another box number, but investigators determined that the box-batch combination she cited didn’t exist.

Other hand count participants told investigators they also had seen suspicious-looking ballots, but they had not noted the box or batch numbers.

so...nothing again. lol

If investigators saw the ballots that were shown on national news, then they could not deny the ballots were photocopied from the same source ballot. There is no other possibility. Liars have been covering up Democrat voter fraud for decades, which no knowledgable American can deny.

Lawyers with the state attorney general’s office on Tuesday filed a response brief on behalf of the secretary of state that details investigative steps taken in response to the claims. Investigators interviewed witnesses and examined about 1,000 absentee ballots and ballot images. They did not uncover any ballots matching those described by the people who swore affidavits or that otherwise appeared to be fraudulent or counterfeit, the brief says.

The people who submitted affidavits said they saw absentee ballots that looked as if they had been marked by machine rather than by hand and had not been creased as they would have been to fit in an envelope.

The secretary of state’s brief says investigators examined the ballots in the batches and box identified by one person who participated in the hand count, but all had been creased and none appeared to have been marked by a computer. The woman then told investigators she may have been mistaken and gave them another box number, but investigators determined that the box-batch combination she cited didn’t exist.

Other hand count participants told investigators they also had seen suspicious-looking ballots, but they had not noted the box or batch numbers.

so...nothing again. lol

The state examiners claimed they found no evidence that would bring reproach on their fellow state employees who covered up voter fraud? What does that prove? Where are the reports from investigators not in league with state officials who covered up the fraud? The ballot images have been hidden from the public since the time whistleblowers revealed their existence, so corrupt officials and their allies could claim any lying thing they wanted without fear of discovery.

 

[pjmret]

If investigators saw the ballots that were shown on national news, then they could not deny the ballots were photocopied from the same source ballot. There is no other possibility. Liars have been covering up Democrat voter fraud for decades, which no knowledgable American can deny.

The state examiners claimed they found no evidence that would bring reproach on their fellow state employees who covered up voter fraud? What does that prove? Where are the reports from investigators not in league with state officials who covered up the fraud? The ballot images have been hidden from the public since the time whistleblowers revealed their existence, so corrupt officials and their allies could claim any lying thing they wanted without fear of discovery.

No they found no evidence of the fanciful tale of right wing morons

You morons never have pictures or anything concrete just words, don't right wing morons have cell phones? Lol

 

[mark francis]

State election investigators couldn’t find any fraudulent or counterfeit ballots within ballot batches cited by Republican vote-counters who participated in a statewide audit in November, according to a court filing Tuesday on behalf of Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.



There was no indication of “pristine” ballots with perfectly filled-in ovals and no creases, as alleged in the lawsuit. All ballots in those batches appeared to be authentic.


you morons need better "proof" lol

The state officials responsible for the fraud claimed they examined the fraudulent ballots and found nothing wrong. That is not what non-state examiners found who reported batches of pristine duplicated ballots. Why have we not seen proof the state examiners are telling the truth? Because crooks do not allow the public to examine fraudulent ballots.

 

[mark francis]

As per usual, it was a stitch up by a republican nutter.

"May have been mistaken".
Did you miss that but?

Well well. Nothing you have posted proves anything. You are so using unverifiable nonsense as evidence.

Everyone goes silent when the spooks arrive to do an investigation. You're not looking good *****.

Democrats committed the voter fraud and then lied about it, claiming the American patriots were the ones lying. Don't believe the criminal leftist thugs for a minute.

 

[mark francis]

No they found no evidence of the fanciful tale of right wing morons

You morons never have pictures or anything concrete just words, don't right wing morons have cell phones? Lol

The crooks and their investigator pals found no evidence of a crime? How convenient.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats committed the voter fraud and then lied about it, claiming the American patriots were the ones lying. Don't believe the criminal leftist thugs for a minute.

Ironically it's republicans who are going to court but that wouldn't resonate with an idiot.

 

[pjmret]

The crooks and their investigator pals found no evidence of a crime? How convenient.

You morons never document your claims with pictures?
How stupid lol

 

[Boris Norris]

If investigators saw the ballots that were shown on national news, then they could not deny the ballots were photocopied from the same source ballot. There is no other possibility. Liars have been covering up Democrat voter fraud for decades, which no knowledgable American can deny.

The state examiners claimed they found no evidence that would bring reproach on their fellow state employees who covered up voter fraud? What does that prove? Where are the reports from investigators not in league with state officials who covered up the fraud? The ballot images have been hidden from the public since the time whistleblowers revealed their existence, so corrupt officials and their allies could claim any lying thing they wanted without fear of discovery.

Gees you carry on with some shit.
Not one piece of so-called evidence has laid a glove in democrats. You're a nutter.

 

[mark francis]

Ironically it's republicans who are going to court but that wouldn't resonate with an idiot.

In China it is the religious people who are enslaved and/or murdered like sheep at the hands of brutal leftist fascist pals and dirty business associates of American Democrats.

 

[mark francis]

You morons never document your claims with pictures?
How stupid lol

I've seen the preserved images of the clearly photocopied ballots that leftist officials strictly forbid releasing to the public in spite of the leaks.

 

[mark francis]

Gees you carry on with some shit.
Not one piece of so-called evidence has laid a glove in democrats. You're a nutter.

Call them slick, like Willie if you like, or Teflon, like Gotti.

 

[pjmret]

I've seen the preserved images of the clearly photocopied ballots that leftist officials strictly forbid releasing to the public in spite of the leaks.

You have seen them from a credible source? Post the link