the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
then why do you quote him and claim darwi was right about mans evolution only he necver claimed man came from apes *****.You obsess about Darwin. He is not current science, science *****
then why do you quote him and claim darwi was right about mans evolution only he necver claimed man came from apes *****.You obsess about Darwin. He is not current science, science *****
Humans and apes had a common ancestor. It's not like Mr and Mrs Ape one day gave birth to a mutant human.then why do you quote him and claim darwi was right about mans evolution only he necver claimed man came from apes *****.
what are you babbling about? where did I say anything like that? lol.then why do you quote him and claim darwi was right about mans evolution only he necver claimed man came from apes *****.
you always claim Darwin was right yet he never claim man evolved from apes and there has never been a missing link found .what are you babbling about? where did I say anything like that? lol.
i said darwin was generally correct in that he believed in evolution, which is a generally accepted scientific theory.you always claim Darwin was right yet he never claim man evolved from apes and there has never been a missing link found .
No single-celled organism could have ever been the source of all life on the earth. When scientists finally agreed on that fact we saw poor deluded Darwin's unscientific 'tree of life' felled once for all.All life may have evolved from a one single celled life form or from more than one. We will never know which, since single celled organism do not leave skeletons or other evidence behind.
Some people believe Muhammad rode his half-ass donkey Barack to the seventh heaven to beg Jesus for help and some people believe humans inherited their thinking abilities from monkeys.Humans and apes had a common ancestor. It's not like Mr and Mrs Ape one day gave birth to a mutant human.
Darwin was much closer to 100% wrong than 100% right.i said darwin was generally correct in that he believed in evolution, which is a generally accepted scientific theory.
i never said he was 100% correct on every single one of his beliefs...unless you can quote me saying that. duh.
You said you believed in evolution and Darwin we didn't discuss details .i said darwin was generally correct in that he believed in evolution, which is a generally accepted scientific theory.
i never said he was 100% correct on every single one of his beliefs...unless you can quote me saying that. duh.
Still obsessing about Darwin lolNo single-celled organism could have ever been the source of all life on the earth. When scientists finally agreed on that fact we saw poor deluded Darwin's unscientific 'tree of life' felled once for all.
Let me know when you make senseYou said you believed in evolution and Darwin we didn't discuss details .
Why ch is the impossible with you and religion or science.
See there you go lying by implying that .Still obsessing about Darwin lol
NO ONE claims that humans are descended from monkeys. The fact is that over 98% of the DNA of humans is shared with chimpanzees. Chimpanzees are not monkeys, they are apes. Monkeys all have tails, Apes do not. Humans are also not descended from chimpanzees, they simply have a common ancestor with chimpanzees.
Evolution has progressed hugely since the times of Darwin. Of course, Mark has never read Darwin, or the writings of any other evolutionist, either. Mark is simple an ignorant fundamentalist White Christian. He wants to believe in talking snakes and a wacko deity that likes to punish sinners by punishing their offspring for hundreds of generations.
Ham saw Noah's pecker, according to the Bible, so God punished him by making him Black and a mamber of a lower caste only fit for hauling water and chopping wood.
How many children have NOT seen their father's pecker? This is a very common occurrence.
I see you still criticize anyone who exposes the truths about Darwin's erroneous beliefs that have been debunked by science.Still obsessing about Darwin lol