mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,698
Global warming assumptions are not irrefutable scientific facts.science isn't speculation.
god you are a science moooron.
Global warming assumptions are not irrefutable scientific facts.science isn't speculation.
god you are a science moooron.
Good thing they have evidence, not just assumptions science mooronGlobal warming assumptions are not irrefutable scientific facts.
Lefties examine data and draw unstudied conclusions in accordance with dummass democrat speculations.Good thing they have evidence, not just assumptions science mooron
Scientists do science it has nothing to do with political speculationLefties examine data and draw unstudied conclusions in accordance with dummass democrat speculations.
A common error made in science is assuming unproven speculations, assumptions, interpretations and theories are scientific facts.Scientists do science it has nothing to do with political speculation
You are such a science mooron
its "common"? prove it.A common error made in science is assuming unproven speculations, assumptions, interpretations and theories are scientific facts.
You are Rember saying science was right 99.99 percent of the time . You argued with me over it . You were wrong then are you flip floppingyes, science is never actually 100% proven. something that scientists think is correct today could be proven wrong tomorrow.
are you just figuring out how science works? hahahahahahahha
here is some science for you lug nut flappingGood thing they have evidence, not just assumptions science mooron
So I was referring of course to common life and I keep asking you when in your life has science failed you when in your life has science been wrong I keep asking you that and you endeavor answer it is it because you are too stupid to answer it is it because you know the answer will make you look stupid LOLYou are Rember saying science was right 99.99 percent of the time . You argued with me over it . You were wrong then are you flip flopping
now giggles
Yeah, it had a twin cylinder engine and could hit 100 MPH in twelve seconds. The Sidecar was optional.here is some science for you lug nut flapping
Milankovitch cycle have you ever heard of it ?
S0o what I could care less what you asked you claim science is right 99.99 percent of the time were you lying then r are you lying nowSo I was referring of course to common life and I keep asking you when in your life has science failed you when in your life has science been wrong I keep asking you that and you endeavor answer it is it because you are too stupid to answer it is it because you know the answer will make you look stupid LOL
i said science was right in everyday life, and it is.S0o what I could care less what you asked you claim science is right 99.99 percent of the time were you lying then r are you lying now
See that's the weasel way. You said science is right 99.99 percent of the the time ,when questioned THEN YOU CHANGED THE CLAIM.i said science was right in everyday life, and it is.
you can prove i'm lying by showing how science has failed you in everyday life.
but you can't
quote me exactly. you make claims and can't back them up. which sounds like lying lolSee that's the weasel way. You said science is right 99.99 percent of the the time ,when questioned THEN YOU CHANGED THE CLAIM.
NOW WERE YOU LYING THEN OR NOW WEASEL.