It is Mathematically Impossible for There to be NO Creator

[Real News Links]

What's Wrong with Atheism? — Science and God

Is there any meaning to life? Or is life nothing more than a cosmic accident? Scientific atheists claim the latter, but ironically, it’s science itself that suggests the former.

 

[Boris Norris]

What's Wrong with Atheism? — Science and God

Is there any meaning to life? Or is life nothing more than a cosmic accident? Scientific atheists claim the latter, but ironically, it’s science itself that suggests the former.

Another godbotherer helping you push your Barrow.

 

[Real News Links]

First post:

It is Mathematically Impossible for There to be NO Creator

In 1943, the distinguished French mathematician Émile Borel stated that “events with a sufficiently small probability never occur” (Institute of Mathematical Statistics).

Dr. Borel chose a fairly safe number, 10 to the power of 50, written as View attachment 2063

For you average folks, that is expressed as one in 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Anything with a lower probability than that would not happen, said Borel the numbers man.

Is it hard to wrap your head around that one? How's this:

The “infinite monkey theorem” this states that if enough monkeys pound the keys of enough typewriters (hundred of trillions?) they will eventually write the complete works of Shakespeare. While this is theoretically possible, in fact, it can never happen, and therefore constitutes a "statistical" or mathematical impossibility.

As for Earth and Man, the odds that the number of variables needed for life to just come about on its own, from the earth being the right size and the right distance from the sun, tilted on the correct axis, to the chemical make-up of all the elements and the combination of water and land, to life itself just spontaneously coming into being, and then evolving into man, and all the millions of other variables that come in between those . . . .the odds of that number of variables actually coming together by chance is far beyond 10 to the power of 50, and therefore while it is theoretically possible, it is actually no more possible than a monkey accidentally typing the entire works of Shakespeare.

So, there you go all you big science and math fans. God must exist. The math says so.

Conclusion:

Math cannot be refuted and therefore it is a proven fact that all creation was intelligently designed.

 

[pjmret]

First post:

It is Mathematically Impossible for There to be NO Creator

In 1943, the distinguished French mathematician Émile Borel stated that “events with a sufficiently small probability never occur” (Institute of Mathematical Statistics).

Dr. Borel chose a fairly safe number, 10 to the power of 50, written as View attachment 2063

For you average folks, that is expressed as one in 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Anything with a lower probability than that would not happen, said Borel the numbers man.

Is it hard to wrap your head around that one? How's this:

The “infinite monkey theorem” this states that if enough monkeys pound the keys of enough typewriters (hundred of trillions?) they will eventually write the complete works of Shakespeare. While this is theoretically possible, in fact, it can never happen, and therefore constitutes a "statistical" or mathematical impossibility.

As for Earth and Man, the odds that the number of variables needed for life to just come about on its own, from the earth being the right size and the right distance from the sun, tilted on the correct axis, to the chemical make-up of all the elements and the combination of water and land, to life itself just spontaneously coming into being, and then evolving into man, and all the millions of other variables that come in between those . . . .the odds of that number of variables actually coming together by chance is far beyond 10 to the power of 50, and therefore while it is theoretically possible, it is actually no more possible than a monkey accidentally typing the entire works of Shakespeare.

So, there you go all you big science and math fans. God must exist. The math says so.

Conclusion:

Math cannot be refuted and therefore it is a proven fact that all creation was intelligently designed.

this whole thing starts with an ASSUMPTION, *****. lol. an assumption that isn't true, mathematically. duh. if something has a NONZERO chance of happening, it can, in fact, happen. duh. that's math.

all this is handwaving, not math or science.

god you're stupid. lol

 

[Boris Norris]

What's Wrong with Atheism? — Science and God

Is there any meaning to life? Or is life nothing more than a cosmic accident? Scientific atheists claim the latter, but ironically, it’s science itself that suggests the former.

It reminds me if the constipated mathematituon.
He worked it out with a pencil too

 

[Real News Links]

It is Mathematically Impossible for There to be NO Creator

In 1943, the distinguished French mathematician Émile Borel stated that “events with a sufficiently small probability never occur” (Institute of Mathematical Statistics).

Dr. Borel chose a fairly safe number, 10 to the power of 50, written as View attachment 2063

For you average folks, that is expressed as one in 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Anything with a lower probability than that would not happen, said Borel the numbers man.

Is it hard to wrap your head around that one? How's this:

The “infinite monkey theorem” this states that if enough monkeys pound the keys of enough typewriters (hundred of trillions?) they will eventually write the complete works of Shakespeare. While this is theoretically possible, in fact, it can never happen, and therefore constitutes a "statistical" or mathematical impossibility.

As for Earth and Man, the odds that the number of variables needed for life to just come about on its own, from the earth being the right size and the right distance from the sun, tilted on the correct axis, to the chemical make-up of all the elements and the combination of water and land, to life itself just spontaneously coming into being, and then evolving into man, and all the millions of other variables that come in between those . . . .the odds of that number of variables actually coming together by chance is far beyond 10 to the power of 50, and therefore while it is theoretically possible, it is actually no more possible than a monkey accidentally typing the entire works of Shakespeare.

So, there you go all you big science and math fans. God must exist. The math says so.

It is Mathematically Impossible for There to be NO Creator.

The thread title and premise has not been disputed by any of the forum's ignorant Godless freaks. It stands as fact, un-refuted.

 

[Lagboltz]

It is Mathematically Impossible for There to be NO Creator

In 1943, the distinguished French mathematician Émile Borel stated that “events with a sufficiently small probability never occur” (Institute of Mathematical Statistics).

Dr. Borel chose a fairly safe number, 10 to the power of 50, written as View attachment 2063

For you average folks, that is expressed as one in 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Anything with a lower probability than that would not happen, said Borel the numbers man.

Is it hard to wrap your head around that one? How's this:

The “infinite monkey theorem” this states that if enough monkeys pound the keys of enough typewriters (hundred of trillions?) they will eventually write the complete works of Shakespeare. While this is theoretically possible, in fact, it can never happen, and therefore constitutes a "statistical" or mathematical impossibility.

As for Earth and Man, the odds that the number of variables needed for life to just come about on its own, from the earth being the right size and the right distance from the sun, tilted on the correct axis, to the chemical make-up of all the elements and the combination of water and land, to life itself just spontaneously coming into being, and then evolving into man, and all the millions of other variables that come in between those . . . .the odds of that number of variables actually coming together by chance is far beyond 10 to the power of 50, and therefore while it is theoretically possible, it is actually no more possible than a monkey accidentally typing the entire works of Shakespeare.

So, there you go all you big science and math fans. God must exist. The math says so.

Do you have a reference for the assumptions that were made for the abundance of elements needed in a planet to support life? For example creatures around sulphur vents deep in the ocean have different requirements than wart hogs. Also many factors such as the tilt of the earth, water volume, etc would have a very wide range for supporting life of some sort on earth.

If the assumptions in your statistical exercise is for an exoplanet to very closely model earth parameters, then I don't think it is realistic for making any conclusion about the probability of a creator.

 

[Real News Links]

Do you have a reference for the assumptions that were made for the abundance of elements needed in a planet to support life?

We are not talking about "a" planet. We are talking about Earth and all its complexities, including man.

A new study by Astrophysicist Erik Zackrisson from Uppsala University in Sweden suggests that there are around 700 quintillion planets in the universe, but only one like Earth. 700 quintillion is a 7 followed by 20 zeros. That's not quite as big as but its good enough. I do not have the reference that Dr Borel used.

Scott and Janice Huse, in their 1997 book The Collapse of Evolution, state that “It is very significant to note that mathematicians generally consider that any event with a probability of one chance [in] 10^50 as having a zero probability (i.e. it is impossible).”

The astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle illustrated this with his Junkyard Tornado Theory: “The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable to the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.”

 

[pjmret]

It is Mathematically Impossible for There to be NO Creator.

The thread title and premise has not been disputed by any of the forum's ignorant Godless freaks. It stands as fact, un-refuted.

i've already disputed it, *****. his argument is full of ASSumptions, not strict math.

god you're stupid. lol

 

[pjmret]

Scott and Janice Huse, in their 1997 book The Collapse of Evolution, state that “It is very significant to note that mathematicians generally consider that any event with a probability of one chance [in] 10^50 as having a zero probability (i.e. it is impossible).”

no, they don't. lol.
mathematicians would never say something with a non zero probability was "impossible"

god you're stupid. lol

 

[pjmret]

The astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle illustrated this with his Junkyard Tornado Theory: “The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable to the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.”

lol, absolutely no credible math in that statement. lol

 

[pjmret]

As for Earth and Man, the odds that the number of variables needed for life to just come about on its own, from the earth being the right size and the right distance from the sun, tilted on the correct axis, to the chemical make-up of all the elements and the combination of water and land, to life itself just spontaneously coming into being, and then evolving into man, and all the millions of other variables that come in between those . . . .the odds of that number of variables actually coming together by chance is far beyond 10 to the power of 50, and therefore while it is theoretically possible, it is actually no more possible than a monkey accidentally typing the entire works of Shakespeare.

lol, that's not math, that's ASSumptions. or handwaving. lol.

god you're stupid.

 

[Real News Links]

4x posts by Pedoi-Pj, and what do they total? Nothing, just more ignorance and stupidity.

The first post in this thread stands as fact, un-refuted by the atheist scum

 

[Boris Norris]

4x posts by Pedoi-Pj, and what do they total? Nothing, just more ignorance and stupidity.

The first post in this thread stands as fact, un-refuted by the atheist scum

It's not a fact. let me know when one of your godbotherer ring reamers has a positive sighting.

Atheist scum??? Love it. You're really desperate to score a point now. Stick to your Bible and take more Vaseline for the priests.

 

[Real News Links]

They worship monkeys in Boris' shithole country