Hi masher...well....errrm......
you've really missed the point.
Look....Masher I'll try and make this easy for you....
As opposed to STUPID your first go-round? Great!
Terrorists strike the twin towers in New York the reaction is "who the f*ck done that to us" then all of a sudden everyone hears this name Alkayda something ...bunch of AY'rabs "who d'a f*ck they man...les nuke em" You cannot because it is a confederation of dis-interested radical organisations spread around the world that don't like anyone in particular but managed somehow to put one over the USA - so your Government is on the backfoot it has to bounce on someones head or they'll loose some percentage points in the polls and public oppinion is crying out for action. So.... who's available to get the rap....Ah Iraq! "lets f*ck them man they're and easy target man....no sweat man!
You don't know what you're talking about. There was a debate within al qaeda about who to strike first - the "near enemy" (quasi-democratic middle east regimes, arab socialist regimes, secular arab regimes) or the "far enemy" - the U.S. Osama ben Laden argued, successfully, for the "far enemy". They didn't just happen to pick us. 9-11 was a carefully planned operation against a carefully chosen enemy. As a result the US attacked them where they were at the time - Afghanistan.
Et voila...WMD, Saddam training nasty folks, Al something-or-an-other...terrorists and a bit of UN sactions busting...... GREAT, all of a sudden it amounts to a license to invade and placate the US public who are feeling a might peeved because they cannot aim their collective anger and feelings of total and utter impotence at anything or anybody that caused the loss and deaths in New York!....but hey guess what.....there's some freakin OIL at the end of all this.
More appeaser cant. The US attacked Iraq because intelligence indicated they had nukes. This was the same regime that had attacked THREE neighboring countries, including the first IRBM attacks since WWII. That the Baathist Iraqi regime, which had already been responsible for MILLIONS of deaths would add this new dimension was untenable.
So......5 years later on. Well Masher...here we all are..... a bit naffed off because it didn't take 5 minutes to get the job done and you're still fighting the F*CKIN AY'RABS...with your allies ....and your man Obama is sayin hey.....vote for me and I'll bring the troops back...let the Ay'rabs sort themselves out and all will be hunky dory in the world...I'll be THE PRES and you'll be just like so happy and all that.
Ooooooo.........the war didn't end on your preferred schedule??
The UK fought the Malaysian Emergency for
12 years - and won. The "allies" contribution has been small in the case of the UK, and trivial in the case of other countries. The idea that the arabs will "sort themselves out" is transcendentally stupid - if the US cuts and runs, what will happen is the emergence of an iranian superstate, which will eventually take over saudi arabia and finlandize the rest of the big middle east states. If there are any 12 year olds around you - have them explain the implications of that, I'm tired of typing.
So if you follow the advice of the great Obama you've achieved what exactly.... I'll tell you Masher you've achieved absolutely freakin nothing.....nothing MASHER...all you've done is got a whole bunch of good men killed MASHER..... a whole lot of GOOD AMERICAN SOLDIERS KILLED for what Masher....tell me MASHER what the F*CK have these GOOD men died for MASHER!!!!!
The usual appeaser wholesale avoidance of reality - al qaeda infrastructure has been destroyed all over the world. The Taliban and Saddam overturned, and democracies set up in in iraq and afghanistan. What's left is a handful of bandits in both countries who manage to blow up some women and children. Euroweenies biitch when we've had to deal with dictatorships, then you STILL biitch when we liberate countries and set up democracies. You just biitch whatever happens, and from the sidelines.