Dr.Who
Well-Known Member
how many proved it, over and over again, and 2 years later had to prove it again by getting a special exemption from the state?
He gave some evidence that he was born in Hawaii but he never did prove it. Lots of people were born at home and then merely showed up at a hospital to be registered and their certifications all read that they were born in that state. But how many of them were not? In a country with a long history of "anchor babies" and "amnesty babies" and where "maternity tourism" is widespread just how many woman fail to make it across the borders in time but say they did?
The millions he spent trying to avoid proving it sure made him seem to be hiding something.
The special exemption of a POLICY hardly seems so special since he never even asked for it until this month. How do I know it is a policy? Because if it were a law either a judge would need to authorize the exemption or the Director of Health would need to have a new law written to allow the exemption. And what kind of a state would make a law against using the long form? But does it matter if it was a law or a policy? Not really. It does matter that the President fought it tooth and nail and only recently asked for the form and then has the nerve to say that it is a silly issue. If it were silly he would have simply asked for the form back then.
Lastly, the Director of Health of Hawaii said that they allowed the exemption because of the many requests for the certificate. Yet clearly they allowed it only because the White House finally asked for it. So why did the Director lie?