favorability poll

[mark francis]

Irrefuted? Lol
Even your whining is stupid

Michigan judge rules secretary of state violated election law by unilaterally changing absentee voting rules | Washington Examiner 3-16-21

Tuesday, December 19, 2023

Michigan judge rules secretary of state violated election law by unilaterally changing absentee voting rules

by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor

March 16, 2021 07:18 PM

A judge has ruled that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson violated state law last year when she issued “guidance” on how absentee ballots should be evaluated.

State Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray ruled last week that Benson, a Democrat, did not follow the proper rule-making process when instructing voting clerks in October to presume the accuracy of absentee ballot signatures, and the guidance is now invalid, according to the Detroit News.

"The presumption is found nowhere in state law," Murray, a Republican-appointed judge, wrote in the ruling. "The mandatory presumption goes beyond the realm of mere advice and direction, and instead is a substantive directive that adds to the pertinent signature-matching standards."

 

[pjmret]

Michigan judge rules secretary of state violated election law by unilaterally changing absentee voting rules | Washington Examiner 3-16-21

Tuesday, December 19, 2023

Michigan judge rules secretary of state violated election law by unilaterally changing absentee voting rules

by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor

March 16, 2021 07:18 PM

A judge has ruled that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson violated state law last year when she issued “guidance” on how absentee ballots should be evaluated.

State Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray ruled last week that Benson, a Democrat, did not follow the proper rule-making process when instructing voting clerks in October to presume the accuracy of absentee ballot signatures, and the guidance is now invalid, according to the Detroit News.

"The presumption is found nowhere in state law," Murray, a Republican-appointed judge, wrote in the ruling. "The mandatory presumption goes beyond the realm of mere advice and direction, and instead is a substantive directive that adds to the pertinent signature-matching standards."

Yes after the facts decisions can be wrong
Which isn't fraud, legal moooron lol

 

[mark francis]

No they didn't. The evidence was refuted by judges.
It was their decision you didn't like.

No judge in the nation ever came close to suggesting or proving only insignificant numbers of illegitimate ballots were cast in 2020.

 

[mark francis]

Yes after the facts decisions can be wrong
Which isn't fraud, legal moooron lol

Democrats dishonestly blame their deliberate fraud on things like: glitches, human errors, honest mistakes, anomalies, and the like while never admitting they cannot prove hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots cannot be verified as having legitimacy.

 

[pjmret]

No judge in the nation ever came close to suggesting or proving only insignificant numbers of illegitimate ballots were cast

Democrats dishonestly blame their deliberate fraud on things like: glitches, human errors, honest mistakes, anomalies, and the like while never admitting they cannot prove hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots cannot be verified as having legitimacy.

Prove deliberate fraud lying ***** lol

God you are stupid lol

 

[Boris Norris]

No judge in the nation ever came close to suggesting or proving only insignificant numbers of illegitimate ballots were cast in 2020.

That's right. They don't have to when the likes of you present evidence there was no fraud.