Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 15,097
He's a demented paranoid dickhead.So you have no evidence to actually back up your stupid post you must enjoy looking stupid and I certainly enjoy laughing at you LOL
He's a demented paranoid dickhead.So you have no evidence to actually back up your stupid post you must enjoy looking stupid and I certainly enjoy laughing at you LOL
Here is proof that real investigations into real evidence of clear voting fraud were opened by the top voting fraud crook in Georgia and then dismissed by leftist election judges in Georgia who examined their 2020 voting fraud operation and found no evidence of fraud.So you have no evidence to actually back up your stupid post you must enjoy looking stupid and I certainly enjoy laughing at you LOL
Did it ever occur to you they were kicked out because they were not proof of anything?Here is proof that real investigations into real evidence of clear voting fraud were opened by the top voting fraud crook in Georgia and then dismissed by leftist election judges in Georgia who examined their 2020 voting fraud operation and found no evidence of fraud.
- https://katv.com/news/nation-world/georgia-opens-investigation-into-ballot-harvesting-claims 1-5-22
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/17/georgia-elections-board-dismisses-ballot-harvesting-complaints/ 5-17-22
- https://sos.ga.gov/news/state-election-board-clears-fulton-county-ballot-suitcase-investigation-report-finds-no 6-20-23
Whatever reasons they gave for refusing to try voting fraud cases in their courts does nothing to change the fact that no court disproved any evidence of 2020 voting fraud.Did it ever occur to you they were kicked out because they were not proof of anything?
Trump tried to install fake electors but you never mention that election interference.
It did by refusing to waste it's time on a frivolous case for which the evidence proved.Whatever reasons they gave for refusing to try voting fraud cases in their courts does nothing to change the fact that no court disproved any evidence of 2020 voting fraud.
Democrats continue to 'fight like hell' against voting fraud investigations, claiming such investigations would be a waste of time since democrats have already repeatedly declared that there was no 2020 voting fraud of consequence, and refusing to blindly take their word for it is undemocratic.It did by refusing to waste it's time on a frivolous case for which the evidence proved.
You can rattle on with your ridiculous justifications but that scenario will never can any further than your head.
Exactly. No court ever made any reliable ruling against the evidence of voting fraud they never examined in open court.Courts do not disprove anything and least of all elections. Your whole argument originates because you were beaten.
No court will ever hear it.
Voting fraud investigations are like murder investigations in that no suspect or suspicion can be cleared or dismissed without investigation.You're wasting the precious time you have left in persuing that rubbish. You will not get rewards from god nor go to heaven for pushing the agenda. Grow up or maybe it's a bit late for that.
so you have proven your evidence wasn't credible.Here is proof that real investigations into real evidence of clear voting fraud were opened by the top voting fraud crook in Georgia and then dismissed by leftist election judges in Georgia who examined their 2020 voting fraud operation and found no evidence of fraud.
- https://katv.com/news/nation-world/georgia-opens-investigation-into-ballot-harvesting-claims 1-5-22
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/17/georgia-elections-board-dismisses-ballot-harvesting-complaints/ 5-17-22
- https://sos.ga.gov/news/state-election-board-clears-fulton-county-ballot-suitcase-investigation-report-finds-no 6-20-23
Denying the facts will never do anything to refute the evidence of unrefuted massive 2020 voting fraud.so you have proven your evidence wasn't credible.
it wasn't "clear evidence of fraud' or you wouldn't have lost every case. duh.
good job! lol
you enjoy making yourself look stupid.
I deny no factsDenying the facts will never do anything to refute the evidence of unrefuted massive 2020 voting fraud.
Among dozens of other facts about 2020 voting fraud crimes and coverups, democrats testified in 2019 about the vulnerability of Dominion voting machines but 'fought like hell' against republican examinations of suspect machines immediately following the 2020 election while democrats were busily erasing data from some machines.I deny no facts
I j6st laugh at your stupidity
Yes it's a fact they testified duhAmong dozens of other facts about 2020 voting fraud crimes and coverups, democrats testified in 2019 about the vulnerability of Dominion voting machines but 'fought like hell' against republican examinations of suspect machines immediately following the 2020 election while democrats were busily erasing data from some machines.
Same old lies.Democrats continue to 'fight like hell' against voting fraud investigations, claiming such investigations would be a waste of time since democrats have already repeatedly declared that there was no 2020 voting fraud of consequence, and refusing to blindly take their word for it is undemocratic.
Exactly. No court ever made any reliable ruling against the evidence of voting fraud they never examined in open court.
Voting fraud investigations are like murder investigations in that no suspect or suspicion can be cleared or dismissed without investigation.
The crooks weaved and dodged avoiding dealing with the irrefuted evidence of massive 2020 voting fraud.Yes it's a fact they testified duh
You mooorons failed to prove your claims
Because you are mooorons lol
Irrefuted? LolThe crooks weaved and dodged avoiding dealing with the irrefuted evidence of massive 2020 voting fraud.
No they didn't. The evidence was refuted by judges.The crooks weaved and dodged avoiding dealing with the irrefuted evidence of massive 2020 voting fraud.