Did Obama really have gay sex and smoked crack in a Limo?

you racist!

If you beleive this then you have to be as racist as the other racist who said the same in our country. Because more blacks than any other group are aborted, in fact they target poor black communities for free abortions and then bragged the crime rate was lower. Of course it was all liberal scum who did this. They were racist pigs and finally I understand why you are so obsessed with bed sheets and pointy hats..... you are all those dirty things you talk about.

This is the obama thread, if you must talk about your lust for killing inocent babies, do it in the abortion thread!


You tell 'me' to keep on topic? You and your beaver dam that backed up your river for 40 miles. You silly dungbeetle!
 
Werbung:
I am serious, you are having mini mental health breadowns. Try and post in the right spot ok. Shall I open a thread for your mental health issues?

Really? Are you really serious? Do you think I need help? I've been wondering the same thing for quite a while now. Sometimes I have this terrible, terrible headache and I hear voices in my head screaming at me. Do you think the voices are real? Sometimes at night in bed I wake up with snakes crawling all over my skin and I can't get away from them becaue they wrap around my legs!

Yes, I need help but I don't know where to go for help. Help me please. I have money and I can afford hundreds of thousands of dollars. Just please help me because I don't want to have to do 'it' again. Tell me your real name by p.m. and tell me where you live so I can come to you for help. Pleeeeeeeaaaaasssssssssssssseeeeee! Before I have to do 'it' again!
 
UShaditcoming's bid is to derail conversations, purposefully.

There are two subjects s/he is most uncomfortable with I've noticed. Well one really...me...lol.. But two actual subjects of discussion here really are upsetting his agenda. One is oil. My hunch tells me he is a BigOil spindoctor who, not being able to inject learned debate that would reflect well on his master (since nothing really will at this point), he has chosen instead to inject nonsense and badgering into debate to siderail the topic to "why is UShaditcoming so insane." Note: we no longer are talking about Obama, cocaine and gay promiscuous sex.

Which brings me to the second topic that seems to unsettle Ushad.. The idea of Obama not seeming electable. And it fits perfectly with his BigOil agenda. If his ilk (he's not Canadian, my money's on it) cannot succeed in getting Obama to the general election as "electable" then BigOil's puppet McCain cannot seat them back in executive power again. And that means slow death for their industry.

My hunch is that Ushad is BigOil working yet another angle. Other than his being just insane, his actions are more in line with purposeful distraction. And with purposeful distraction, you have to wonder why? The purpose of distraction is to deflect attention away from something else. And there must be a reason why UShad is doing that.

I'm open to other theories as to why he's doing that..

*********
Meanwhile...:rolleyes:

The sex scandal with Edwards is the distant drum roll people. Get ready for the Obama sex scandal. It's funny how democrats can sit watching the approaching tornado, sipping iced tea like their lofty ideals will somehow stem the fierce gales of certain death. I've seen this dangerous dance performed by them for so many elections that I now believe the democratic party is suicidal. I think the whole party suffers from a pathology of wanting to fail.

Like Jon Stewart said, "how are the democrats going to fcuk up this election." Now we know how: with the help of the GOP and the Sinclair story pitted against lofty ideals of a quasi (fake)-Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and white guilt's stubborn refusal to see what is right in front of its face.
 
Actually Sihouetter, you missed the obvious. I'm a Canadian who is intent on helping to destroy Obama so McCain will win and he will continue to take your country down. But in any event I have now come to the conclusion that it won't make a lot of difference who wins because it's pretty obvious that the US can't fix it's problems until it starts to acknowledge what's wrong with it. I've tried normal conversations with Rob and Andy because they seemed to be intelligent enough to start getting it but they too have failed mostly. Although I will say that Rob showed some promise to begin with. Andy just took the obvious truth and denied it so that was a lost cause.

If you were ever interested in learning something from an outside source you have a chance but you would have to leave your silly conspiracy theories outside and I don't really think you can do that. But maybe you can surprise me. For now the offer will remain open until you show once again that you are incapable of logical thought processes.

You see Sihouette, you people have drove me to join in your silliness and if that's the way it's going to be then I'll just hang around for a while longer and make fun of you Americans. Can you rise above it for a while?
 
UShaditcoming's bid is to derail conversations, purposefully.

My hunch tells me he is a BigOil spindoctor who, not being able to inject learned debate that would reflect well on his master (since nothing really will at this point), he has chosen instead to inject nonsense and badgering into debate to siderail the topic to "why is UShaditcoming so insane."

You got his number alright! Another Big Oil Shill, shilling for Big Oil. :)
 
More of What's Coming... http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/33164.html

The clanking you hear in Barak Obama's closet is Larry Sinclair. Rattle, rattle, toil and battle. Conscionably, innocently, Larry Sinclair wanted Barak Obama to fess up, "own up" as we say in the west, to crack cocaine use back in 1999. Asking people to vote for you to be President of the United States when you are a crack cocaine user just wasn't something Larry Sinclair thought was right. He felt so strongly about the issue, that he advised the Obama Campaign that he thought Obama should tell the truth about his drug use!

"Conscionbly, innocently..." The adjectives and adverbs describing Sinclair by the GOP are stacking up on the credible side. Can anyone guess why? :cool:
 
More of What's Coming... http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/33164.html



"Conscionbly, innocently..." The adjectives and adverbs describing Sinclair by the GOP are stacking up on the credible side. Can anyone guess why? :cool:

Why are you STILL calling ONE SINGLE POSTER AT ONE SINGLE SITE the GOP?
Can I start referring to you and your posts as being straight from the DNC?

Are you still going to be around after the election? I hope you are... :)
 
Like Jon Stewart said, "how are the democrats going to fcuk up this election." Now we know how...

Senator Obama will win this election.

But it would have been much easier without all the pure childishness the Clinton campaign concockted... such as prolonging the race when she knew she had no real mathematical chance.

Now that camp is in a snit because not enough Obama supporters are running up to pay HER CAMPAIGN DEBT.:confused:

Sometimes it boils down to just personal responsibility. It's not that the Clintons are not good people. It's that they just lost their minds over this campaign.

First they were out bragging... actually bragging on national TV that they were so good that the primary race would be over in just a couple months.

Then they started falling behind... lost like 12 primaries in a row and went spiteful and negative.

Then they stayed at the party way too long and lost their sense of grace.

Then they still didn't want to admit the obvious and just conceed... so then the Party elders, many her supporters, had to have these long talks with her on reality and the betterment of the real cause... to defeat another dangerous Republican and try to start putting our country back on track.

Now it's whining over "you won't pay our bills".

If anything bad would ever happen no one has to look far. The facts would be obvious and no Clinton should ever be in the political spotlight again representing the Democratic Party. They would look very Lieberman like!
 
Like Jon Stewart said, "how are the democrats going to fcuk up this election." Now we know how...

Senator Obama will win this election.

But it would have been much easier without all the pure childishness the Clinton campaign concockted... such as prolonging the race when she knew she had no real mathematical chance.

Now that camp is in a snit because not enough Obama supporters are running up to pay HER CAMPAIGN DEBT.:confused:

Sometimes it boils down to just personal responsibility. It's not that the Clintons are not good people. It's that they just lost their minds over this campaign.

First they were out bragging... actually bragging on national TV that they were so good that the primary race would be over in just a couple months.

Then they started falling behind... lost like 12 primaries in a row and went spiteful and negative.

Then they stayed at the party way too long and lost their sense of grace.

Then they still didn't want to admit the obvious and just conceed... so then the Party elders, many her supporters, had to have these long talks with her on reality and the betterment of the real cause... to defeat another dangerous Republican and try to start putting our country back on track.

Now it's whining over "you won't pay our bills".

The Clintons actually ought to be praying Senator Obama wins big. The facts are no Clinton would ever be in the Presidential spotlight again representing the Democratic Party if he doesn't just on the way her and some of her supporters have acted.

Hillary would be so casted as Lieberman like to enough people in the Democratic Party her Presidential chances would be over forever.

The Democratic Party cannot win without a strong ethnic vote and if anyone thinks it would be "let bye gones be bye gones" when Hillary herself didn't... well good luck with that.:)
 
Hillary still wants to be on the ticket at the convention... She's hoping to steal the nomination from Obama. Have you not been following that? Not all his supporters are as faithful as you, many are having second thoughts and Hillary has done a good job of positioning herself... Obama said he wanted all the delegates in Michigan and Florida to count - no penalty for going early - and Hillary is attempting to use those new delegates to wrest power away from Obama at the convention.

You may remember, it came down to Super-Delegates - NOT voters - to decide who the Democrat nomination would go to... they don't finalize their vote until the Convention, so you could be very disappointed with the results.
 
Hillary still wants to be on the ticket at the convention... She's hoping to steal the nomination from Obama. Have you not been following that? Not all his supporters are as faithful as you, many are having second thoughts and Hillary has done a good job of positioning herself... Obama said he wanted all the delegates in Michigan and Florida to count - no penalty for going early - and Hillary is attempting to use those new delegates to wrest power away from Obama at the convention.

You may remember, it came down to Super-Delegates - NOT voters - to decide who the Democrat nomination would go to... they don't finalize their vote until the Convention, so you could be very disappointed with the results.

Oh I would leap for joy if that stone cold wench beat the ONE the world has been waiting for.


When is the convention and is any certian channel playing it in full?
 
Werbung:
Oh I would leap for joy if that stone cold wench beat the ONE the world has been waiting for.


When is the convention and is any certian channel playing it in full?

Democratic Convention starts August 25th. I know MSNBC is offering 7 hours a night anchored by Keith Olbermann and Chris Mathews. I'm sure the other cable channels have similar plans.
 
Back
Top