Did Obama really have gay sex and smoked crack in a Limo?

[UShadItComing]

If you are attempting to deflect the subject UShaditcoming, by ridiculing me for what is inevitable, you'd do well to invest your energy elsewhere.

The only thing that now is ripe for debate with the potent Sinclair circumstantial evidence is whether or not the GOP will wave it in front of the public's face should they fear an Obama upset this Fall.

This pundit says, "yes, yes they will."

So if Obama is ahead in the polls this Fall he is screwed. If he is behind he is screwed.

Rephrasing that to reflect a much broader implication we can say, "If Obama is ahead in the polls this Fall democrats are screwed. If he is behind, democrats are screwed."

Either way, democrats are screwed...

Seriously Sihouette, when you started talking about this, the number 13, and other such subjects, I knew you were one American to take seriously.

 

[top gun]

NO Obamanation;54098]Top Gun,

I don’t know if this is true or not...

Well maybe the fact that you cite a lie detector test as proof of something horrible against a Good Christian, Family Man with a Wife and two LITTLE GIRLS, Senator Obama... when actually your buddy the false accuser failed the lie detector test makes you a wonderful person.

I'm sorry... I just don't see it. Actually I'm a little sorry for ya.

 

[top gun]

Sihouette;54123]See, the race card is already being played and CNN hasn't even dropped the bomb post-Denver yet..

Remember, we can debate the Sinclair issue until we're blue in the face as to its veracity.

No veracity... just a proven lie by a shameless liar and anyone who promotes the same is the same.


Larry Sinclair Polygraph Test Indicates "Deception" In Obama Claims
Submitted by Julie on February 25, 2008 - 3:41pm. Elections Elections 2008 News Politics U.S. Politics


The Minnesota man who claims to have had sex with and taken cocaine with Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama voluntarily participated in a series of polygraph tests over the weekend. Whitehouse.com initially offered Larry Sinclair $10,000 to take a polygraph test, and $100,000 if he passed it and was shown to be telling the truth.

Whitehouse.com acquired the services of two expert polygraph examiners, who have examined Mr. Sinclair. The results of the first polygraph examination by Dr. Ed Gelb (Former President of the American Polygraph Association) indicate "deception" in regards to both the drug and sex claims by Sinclair.

The second expert's conclusions have not yet been revealed, but should be early this week. These will either confirm or deny the first examiner's results. Whitehouse.com has additionally promised to post video recordings of the examinations for complete disclosure and transparency.

With regards to the $10,000 payout that Larry Sinclair had agreed to for taking the polygraph test, it has been modified upon Sinclair's request and Whitehouse.com's approval. Prior to taking the test, Sinclair asked for a payout to cover some of his mother's debt.

The first polygraph test is said to have taken approximately four hours. Prior to administering the tests, to be sure there would not be any potential interferences, Sinclair was subjected to a drug test. Sinclair passed the drug test, and was cleared to take the polygraph test.

 

[pocketfullofshells]

all a sane person needs to do it look at his Criminal record and History to see he is not belivable at all.

 

[Sihouette]

Tell that to the GOP. They think differently. And that's all that matters when it comes to painting the right picture to defeat the democrats post-Denver.

We have the GOP calling Sinclair a brave and truthful american. If they can get someone in media to paint this same picture, the democrats might as well pack their bags and forget about November...

Think they can do this? Think they can find a media outlet to help them in their mission?

From The Conservative Voice... http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/33164.html

Obama's paid crew have issued a battery of allegations of criminal acts to discredit Larry Sinclair. The campaign has used positions in government to attempt to render him penniless and helpless to defend himself, and there are threats of physical violence against him and his supporters. There is a tome of harassing emails from the paid Obama smear crew spewing filthy language that is not fit to be in print. It is all there, folks. What Not To Do If Someone Knows Something About You - 101.


The Main Stream Media has taken a huge shopping spree, buying up everything offered in the Obama Cover-up Store! They have bought into the lies and smears, lock, stock and barrell, without looking into the facts, without asking a single question, or showing a modicum of respect to an American, Larry Sinclair, who bravely asked that the truth be told. The Main Stream Media is as guilty as Obama when it comes to the cover-up of this story! Shame on them!


Over the 4th of July, I saw a program on an Italian fireworks master and how those displays were created. I saw the Boston barge loaded with the show, ready for the celebration. It is amazing stuff. Couldn't help thinking about the explosion that is going to happen when a decent Investigative Reporter takes all the information that Larry Sinclair has made available and writes, really writes, this story.

 

[UShadItComing]

Tell that to the GOP. They think differently. And that's all that matters when it comes to painting the right picture to defeat the democrats post-Denver.

We have the GOP calling Sinclair a brave and truthful american. If they can get someone in media to paint this same picture, the democrats might as well pack their bags and forget about November...

Think they can do this? Think they can find a media outlet to help them in their mission?

From The Conservative Voice... http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/33164.html

And now the word is out that Balack Obama blew Larry too while he smoked crak cocaine. And it's true because Obama took a lie detector test!

And Sihoette, it all happened on the 13th. of September!

 

[GenSeneca]

We have the GOP calling Sinclair a brave and truthful american.

Since when does one person posting on a blog constitute "The GOP"?

 

[Sihouette]

It's not one person posting a blog, it is an accepted author on The Conservative Voice.
Big difference friend.

Ever hear of foreshadowing? Time to study Literature 101..

Annnnnndd...

It doesn't matter which branch of the right releases the story...so long as they do and paint Sinclair as a credible witness...

It's all about who and what gets more air time.

And I'll pose the question again....think the GOP can pull off that air time in a pinch?

You betcha....

 

[UShadItComing]

American's, when you tire of this crap our borders are open.

Not for you Sihoette and not for racists either.

 

[Sihouette]

Wow, you're really good at debate!

 

[GenSeneca]

It's not one person posting a blog, it is an accepted author on The Conservative Voice.
Big difference friend.

Since when did "The Conservative Voice" become the voice of the GOP? You're grasping at straws again...

 

[Dr.Who]

The Sinclair thing will never gain any traction. If the American people don't care that he refused to stop the murder of babies that were already born by signing a bill that virtually every other congressmen signed and was passed by the senate unanymously why would they care about the murder of one man where sufficient evidence may never come to light.

 

[Pandora]

The Sinclair thing will never gain any traction. If the American people don't care that he refused to stop the murder of babies that were already born by signing a bill that virtually every other congressmen signed and was passed by the senate unanymously why would they care about the murder of one man where sufficient evidence may never come to light.

I do not think most people know his views on the born alive, or even is views on partial birth abortion. I have talked to a great number of people who did not know his views on those issues. Obama's views on abortion will be known to the people during the October November TV ads. Some will be sickened by it and others wont care.

The press can't keep from reporting this story forever. Eventually it will come out. And some people wont care, others will care more about the gay sex than that murder and some will care more about the murder than all the above (thats where I stand)

Or Obama will tell his part of the story and explain why his and his managers cell phones were calling Sinclair and it will end up being something totally inocent.

Any other American would have to explain theirselves if they had these types of connections to someone who is murdered and the murder is unsolved.

But like so many other things Obama, it may just be over looked and excused.

 

[Sihouette]

With Obama's views on these types of abortions to which even hardened OB/GYNs have trouble stomaching...it makes it all the more mysterious why "democratic" governor Ritter of Colorado, a pro-life conservative catholic, ("democrat"-remember.. ) supports and promotes Obama and will preside over the Denver convention where his nomination will be shoved down democrats' throats..

****

Meanwhile Dr. Who writes this..

The Sinclair thing will never gain any traction. If the American people don't care that he refused to stop the murder of babies that were already born by signing a bill that virtually every other congressmen signed and was passed by the senate unanymously why would they care about the murder of one man where sufficient evidence may never come to light.

Which "American people" are you talking about.

Let me spell out for you what groups will be offended, appalled and shocked by Sinclair being painted out by the right soon as a courageous american telling the truth:

The allegations are: that Obama is connected with the murders of black gay men from his church who were allegedly murdered to cover their telling about Obama's alleged homosexuality.

Where do I start?

Groups potentially affected:

1. Blacks and other shocked minorities
2. Gays shocked that another gay would kill fellow gays to keep them quiet
3. Church-goers and the entire christian-american community for a host of reasons
4. Anyone offended by lying politicians
5. Anyone with a soul

Did I leave any group out?

 

[Pandora]

With Obama's views on these types of abortions to which even hardened OB/GYNs have trouble stomaching...it makes it all the more mysterious why "democratic" governor Ritter of Colorado, a pro-life conservative catholic, ("democrat"-remember.. ) supports and promotes Obama and will preside over the Denver convention where his nomination will be shoved down democrats' throats..

****

Meanwhile Dr. Who writes this..



Which "American people are you talking about"

Let me spell out for you what groups will be offended, appalled and shocked by Sinclair being painted out by the right soon as a courageous american telling the truth:

The allegations are: that Obama is connected with the murders of black gay men from his church who were allegedly murdered to cover their telling about Obama's alleged homosexuality.

Where do I start?

Groups potentially affected:

1. Blacks and other shocked minorities
2. Gays shocked that another gay would kill fellow gays to keep them quiet
3. Church-goers and the entire christian-american community for a host of reasons
4. Anyone offended by lying politicians
5. Anyone with a soul

Did I leave any group out?

According to Sinclair he had no intention of telling about the sex. He said that he did not mention the sex when first contacting the Obama people. He was just wanting Obama to admit his drug use was not limited to his younger years.


The sex topic came up when Donald Young contacted him asking who in the press he had spoken to and did he tell them about the sex. It was during those calls that Young shared with Sinclair his own sex incounters with Obama to Sinclair.

But according to Sinclair the sex was a non issue, it was the drugs that he was concerned about.

I dont care about the sex or the drugs, I care about the murder of Donald Young.