mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,198
Hillary almost certainly got hundreds of thousands more fraudulent votes than did Trump.
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
cowardly trump didn't testify
- Thread starter pjmret
- Start date
Werbung:
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 15,178
Firstly that doesn't prove Trump's innocence.No, Trump did not break the law, according to the foremost campaign finance expert in the country (the expert the demmy judge refused to allow to testify on Trump's behalf because the corrupt judge knew the expert would blow his banana boat case to bits.)
The Western Journal
Follow
42.8K Followers
FEC Expert Witness Whose Testimony Merchan Denied Discloses What He Would Have Said in Trump Trial
Former Federal Election Commission Chairman Bradley Smith has revealed the testimony he would have given in former President Donald Trump's so-called "hush money" trial, had Judge Juan Merchan allowed it.
Smith was to testify for the defense earlier this week in the case brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, but Trump's attorneys decided to pull him when Merchan denied him the opportunity to address a question at the core of the case: Was the payment made to porn star Stormy Daniels a campaign contribution?
Secondly, of course it was not a campaign contribution. It was disguised as an expense, legal expenses in fact.
Why do you get everything arse about face? Do you ever read anything or comprehend things? Are you mentally disturbed or just a demented old paranoid nut.
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 15,178
Almost certainly???
Where's your evidence of that big mouth.
The same could be said about Trump victory.
No, Trump did not break the law, according to the foremost campaign finance expert in the country (the expert the demmy judge refused to allow to testify on Trump's behalf because the corrupt judge knew the expert would blow his banana boat case to bits.)
The Western Journal
Follow
42.8K Followers
FEC Expert Witness Whose Testimony Merchan Denied Discloses What He Would Have Said in Trump Trial
Former Federal Election Commission Chairman Bradley Smith has revealed the testimony he would have given in former President Donald Trump's so-called "hush money" trial, had Judge Juan Merchan allowed it.
Smith was to testify for the defense earlier this week in the case brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, but Trump's attorneys decided to pull him when Merchan denied him the opportunity to address a question at the core of the case: Was the payment made to porn star Stormy Daniels a campaign contribution?
how is he the "foremost" expert, lying *****? lol
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,198
The judge disallowed the expert testimony because the expert would have told the jury that the criminal charges against Trump are bogus.
God what a stupid response lol
Are you even capable of understanding simple sentences?
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,198
The whole leftist show trial was illegal and unjust and the leftist Trump-hating, Biden-supporting judge could not allow a nationally recognized and respected legal expert to testify that paying a non-disclosure agreement is not a violation of campaign finance laws.
INSIDE THE COURTHOUSE
Judge limits scope of testimony from Trump's planned expert witness
Trump's team wanted the expert to testify about details of campaign finance law.
JOSH GERSTEIN
05/20/2024, 9:48AM ET
Justice Juan Merchan has sharply limited what Trump's planned expert witness can testify about.
Trump's defense team wants to call election law expert Brad Smith to testify about federal campaign finance law. But the judge ruled this morning that allowing Smith to testify expansively on that topic would supplant the judge's role to determine what the law is.
The judge was wrong about the law and he instructed the jury to find Trump guilty of violating the law as he wanted them to see it, not as the law was intended as recognized by legal experts all across the US.
So you lied again lolThe whole leftist show trial was illegal and unjust and the leftist Trump-hating, Biden-supporting judge could not allow a nationally recognized and respected legal expert to testify that paying a non-disclosure agreement is not a violation of campaign finance laws.
INSIDE THE COURTHOUSE
Judge limits scope of testimony from Trump's planned expert witness
Trump's team wanted the expert to testify about details of campaign finance law.
JOSH GERSTEIN
05/20/2024, 9:48AM ET
Justice Juan Merchan has sharply limited what Trump's planned expert witness can testify about.
Trump's defense team wants to call election law expert Brad Smith to testify about federal campaign finance law. But the judge ruled this morning that allowing Smith to testify expansively on that topic would supplant the judge's role to determine what the law is.
The judge was wrong about the law and he instructed the jury to find Trump guilty of violating the law as he wanted them to see it, not as the law was intended as recognized by legal experts all across the US.
Gabriel_Bell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2024
- Messages
- 6,954
Legal experts tell us that not only was this a fair trial, but that Trump was given special treatment than the average citizen does not normally receive.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,198
Leftist legal perverts are wicked in their trampling of the Constitution and the civil rights of hundreds of innocent Americans they have unjustly taken to court on bogus charges in order to wickedly protect the corrupt Democrat party and it's corrupt officials.
Werbung:
God you look so stupid spouting mindless blather lol
Similar threads
